From: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
To: "pradeep@us.ibm.com" <pradeep@us.ibm.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Cc: "bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, David Christensen <drc@ibm.com>,
"honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com" <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"ola.liljedahl@arm.com" <ola.liljedahl@arm.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
David Wilder <wilder@us.ibm.com>,
Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>,
Idan Werpoler <Idanw@mellanox.com>,
Olga Shern <olgas@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc: remove fix of memory barrier for IBM POWER
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:15:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR05MB4224613FA0B8DB3737F8F23DB65F0@VI1PR05MB4224.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190326091539.BA7ncxz8Fxp2oTYc24KVh-wh82OPtukgdfwNZhg094g@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFB810109E.4E511E37-ON882583C7.0060A84E-882583C7.0060D2F5@notes.na.collabserv.com>
+Idan Werpoler.
From: Pradeep Satyanarayana <pradeep@us.ibm.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2019 7:38 PM
To: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com; Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org; David Christensen <drc@ibm.com>; honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com; konstantin.ananyev@intel.com; ola.liljedahl@arm.com; Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; David Wilder <wilder@us.ibm.com>; Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] eal/ppc: remove fix of memory barrier for IBM POWER
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com<mailto:shahafs@mellanox.com>> wrote on 03/23/2019 11:37:42 PM:
> From: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com<mailto:shahafs@mellanox.com>>
> To: "pradeep@us.ibm.com<mailto:pradeep@us.ibm.com>" <pradeep@us.ibm.com<mailto:pradeep@us.ibm.com>>, Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>>
> Cc: "bruce.richardson@intel.com<mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com>" <bruce.richardson@intel.com<mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com>>, Chao
> Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com<mailto:chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>>, Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com<mailto:dekelp@mellanox.com>>,
> "dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>" <dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>>, David Christensen <drc@ibm.com<mailto:drc@ibm.com>>,
> "honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com<mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>" <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com<mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>>,
> "konstantin.ananyev@intel.com<mailto:konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com<mailto:konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>>,
> "ola.liljedahl@arm.com<mailto:ola.liljedahl@arm.com>" <ola.liljedahl@arm.com<mailto:ola.liljedahl@arm.com>>, Ori Kam
> <orika@mellanox.com<mailto:orika@mellanox.com>>, David Wilder <wilder@us.ibm.com<mailto:wilder@us.ibm.com>>, Yongseok Koh
> <yskoh@mellanox.com<mailto:yskoh@mellanox.com>>
> Date: 03/23/2019 11:37 PM
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] eal/ppc: remove fix of memory barrier for IBM POWER
>
> Pradeep,
>
> Pradeep Satyanarayana wrote on Saturday, March 23, 2019 12:58 AM
> >Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>> wrote on 03/22/2019 10:51:17 AM:
> >> Date: 03/22/2019 10:51 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal/ppc: remove fix of memory barrier for IBM POWER
> >>
> >> 22/03/2019 16:30, Pradeep Satyanarayana:
> >> > Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>> wrote on 03/22/2019 01:49:03 AM:
> >> > > 22/03/2019 02:40, Pradeep Satyanarayana:
> >> > > > - rte_[rw]mb (general memory barrier) --> should be lwsync
> >> > >
> >> > > This is what may be discussed.
> >> > > The assumption is that the general memory barrier should cover
> >> > > all cases (CPU caches, SMP and I/O).
> >> > > That's why we think it should "sync" for Power.
> >> >
> >> > In that case, at a minimum we must de-link rte_smp_[rw]mb from rte_[rw]mb
> >> > and retain it as lwsync. Agreed?
> >>
> >> I have no clue about what is needed for SMP barrier in Power.
> >> As long as it works as expected, no problem.
> >>
> >
> >We will try that out and report back here, later next week
>
> Till then, i think there are 2 orthogonal issues:
> 1. ppc rte_wmb is incorrect
> 2. ppc rte_smp_[rw]mb may be improved.
>
> for #1 the current patch from Dekel seems to be OK. do you agree?
> for #2 i guess you will check and come back w/ patch/answer?
That has been the line of thinking. However, we need to do some extensive testing
to confirm that it all holds up.
Thanks
Pradeep
pradeep@us.ibm.com<mailto:pradeep@us.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-26 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-18 12:58 Dekel Peled
2019-03-18 12:58 ` Dekel Peled
2019-03-19 3:24 ` Chao Zhu
2019-03-19 3:24 ` Chao Zhu
2019-03-19 10:05 ` Dekel Peled
2019-03-19 10:05 ` Dekel Peled
2019-03-19 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-19 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-19 19:42 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-19 19:42 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-19 20:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-19 20:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-20 22:40 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-20 22:40 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-21 8:49 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-21 8:49 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-22 1:40 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-22 1:40 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-22 8:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-22 8:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-22 15:30 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-22 15:30 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-22 17:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-22 17:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-22 22:57 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-22 22:57 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-24 6:37 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-24 6:37 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-24 17:37 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-24 17:37 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-26 9:15 ` Dekel Peled [this message]
2019-03-26 9:15 ` Dekel Peled
2019-03-27 9:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-27 9:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-27 23:50 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-27 23:50 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
[not found] ` <OF456B0ECC.006EF7E7-ON882583CA.00827A75-882583CA.0082F7BE@LocalDomain>
2019-03-28 17:51 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-28 17:51 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-28 17:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 17:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 22:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 22:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VI1PR05MB4224613FA0B8DB3737F8F23DB65F0@VI1PR05MB4224.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=dekelp@mellanox.com \
--cc=Idanw@mellanox.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@ibm.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=ola.liljedahl@arm.com \
--cc=olgas@mellanox.com \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=pradeep@us.ibm.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wilder@us.ibm.com \
--cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).