Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline required for stables

[Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>]

On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 17:22 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
> along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
> from major contributors for validation of the releases.
> 
> Also, as decided in the March 27th techboard, to facilitate user
> planning, a release should be designated as a stable release
> no later than 1 month after it's initial master release.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <
> ktraynor@redhat.com
> >
> ---
> 
> v2: add 1 month deadline to designate as stable release.
> I didn't add v1 acks, as this is something new.
> 
>  doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> index 4214103b3..b63cd4228 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> @@ -27,5 +27,7 @@ Stable Releases
>  
>  Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
> -maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
> +maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from
> major
> +contributors to validate it before releases. If a release is to be
> designated
> +as a Stable Release, it should be done by 1 month after the master
> release.
>  
>  A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release
> back to an

Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi