DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: gaetan.rivet@6wind.com, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] ethdev: simplify port state comparisons
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:07:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190401090745.48f23209@shemminger-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190401160745.dWsJXg1vYsGk3M_nEnSmOocvWg0nLVhWhYGNYgGmBJs@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21018304.OXf2jst79b@xps>

On Mon, 01 Apr 2019 17:17:35 +0200
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:

> 01/04/2019 16:58, Stephen Hemminger:
> > On Mon,  1 Apr 2019 04:26:57 +0200
> > Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> >   
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > > index 10bdfb37e..33cffc498 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > > @@ -330,8 +330,7 @@ uint16_t
> > >  rte_eth_find_next(uint16_t port_id)
> > >  {
> > >  	while (port_id < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS &&
> > > -	       rte_eth_devices[port_id].state != RTE_ETH_DEV_ATTACHED &&
> > > -	       rte_eth_devices[port_id].state != RTE_ETH_DEV_REMOVED)
> > > +			rte_eth_devices[port_id].state == RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED)  
> > 
> > For some applications that iterate over ports this is a hot path.  
> 
> Really?
> 
> > What about keeping an unused port bit mask and using ffs (in the future)?  
> 
> I don't understand your proposal. Please could you elaborate?
> 
> Do you agree on this patch anyway?

I have seen some applications spend lots of time doing:

	RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(portid) {


If ethdev kept a bitmask for unused ports then it could use the find
first set instruction.

Maybe the better way is to just fix the application to use its own
bitmask of ports instead.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-01 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-30  0:27 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add siblings iterator Thomas Monjalon
2018-12-11 16:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-11 18:19   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-20 22:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] ethdev iterators for multi-ports device Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-20 22:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ethdev: simplify port state comparisons Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-24 17:18     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-02-20 22:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] ethdev: add siblings iterators Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-24 17:22     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-02-27 10:07     ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-02-27 10:51       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  1:59         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  1:59           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-19 15:47     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-19 15:47       ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-19 17:34       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-19 17:34         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-19 18:04         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-19 18:04           ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-01  2:16           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  2:16             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  6:46             ` David Marchand
2019-04-01  6:46               ` David Marchand
2019-04-01  8:09               ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  8:09                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-02 23:35                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 23:35                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 23:37                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-02 23:37                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-20 22:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/mlx5: use port sibling iterators Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-20 22:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] app/testpmd: use port sibling iterator in device cleanup Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  2:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev iterators for multi-ports device Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  2:26   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  2:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] ethdev: simplify port state comparisons Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  2:26     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 14:58     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-01 14:58       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-01 15:17       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 15:17         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 16:07         ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2019-04-01 16:07           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-03 15:03     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-04-03 15:03       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-04-01  2:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] ethdev: add siblings iterators Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  2:26     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  7:23     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-01  7:23       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 23:42     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 23:42       ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 23:48       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-02 23:48         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 15:03     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-04-03 15:03       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-04-01  2:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] net/mlx5: use port sibling iterators Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  2:26     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 14:19     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-03 14:19       ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-03 18:07       ` Yongseok Koh
2019-04-03 18:07         ` Yongseok Koh
2019-04-04 11:33         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-04 11:33           ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-03 15:04     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-04-03 15:04       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-04-01  2:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] app/testpmd: use port sibling iterator in device cleanup Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01  2:27     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-02 23:43     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 23:43       ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-03 15:04     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-04-03 15:04       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-04-03 16:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev iterators for multi-ports device Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-03 16:42     ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190401090745.48f23209@shemminger-XPS-13-9360 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).