From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/12] net/sfc: move TSO header checks from Tx burst to Tx prepare
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:28:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1554197324-32391-8-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190402092839.otFHARxX3PRauO--5gN-Y-E0H9I65XDTQzCQcpwRtIY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554197324-32391-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com>
From: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Tx offloads checks should be done in Tx prepare.
Signed-off-by: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h | 12 +++++++++---
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c | 9 ++++-----
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tso.c | 9 ---------
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h
index 885094b67..c42d0d01f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h
@@ -195,7 +195,8 @@ sfc_dp_find_tx_by_caps(struct sfc_dp_list *head, unsigned int avail_caps)
const struct sfc_dp_tx *sfc_dp_tx_by_dp_txq(const struct sfc_dp_txq *dp_txq);
static inline int
-sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(struct rte_mbuf *m)
+sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(struct rte_mbuf *m,
+ uint32_t tso_tcp_header_offset_limit)
{
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_SFC_EFX_DEBUG
int ret;
@@ -209,10 +210,15 @@ sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(struct rte_mbuf *m)
SFC_ASSERT(ret < 0);
return -ret;
}
-#else
- RTE_SET_USED(m);
#endif
+ if (m->ol_flags & PKT_TX_TCP_SEG) {
+ unsigned int tcph_off = m->l2_len + m->l3_len;
+
+ if (unlikely(tcph_off > tso_tcp_header_offset_limit))
+ return EINVAL;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c
index b317997ca..3d6ba4292 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c
@@ -320,9 +320,10 @@ sfc_ef10_try_reap(struct sfc_ef10_txq * const txq, unsigned int added,
}
static uint16_t
-sfc_ef10_prepare_pkts(__rte_unused void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
+sfc_ef10_prepare_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
uint16_t nb_pkts)
{
+ struct sfc_ef10_txq * const txq = sfc_ef10_txq_by_dp_txq(tx_queue);
uint16_t i;
for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
@@ -347,7 +348,8 @@ sfc_ef10_prepare_pkts(__rte_unused void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
}
}
#endif
- ret = sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(m);
+ ret = sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(m,
+ txq->tso_tcp_header_offset_limit);
if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
rte_errno = ret;
break;
@@ -378,9 +380,6 @@ sfc_ef10_xmit_tso_pkt(struct sfc_ef10_txq * const txq, struct rte_mbuf *m_seg,
struct rte_mbuf *m_seg_to_free_up_to = first_m_seg;
bool eop;
- if (unlikely(tcph_off > txq->tso_tcp_header_offset_limit))
- return EMSGSIZE;
-
/*
* Preliminary estimation of required DMA descriptors, including extra
* descriptor for TSO header that is needed when the header is
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tso.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tso.c
index 2c03c0837..f46c0e912 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tso.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tso.c
@@ -103,18 +103,9 @@ sfc_efx_tso_do(struct sfc_efx_txq *txq, unsigned int idx,
size_t nh_off = m->l2_len; /* IP header offset */
size_t tcph_off = m->l2_len + m->l3_len; /* TCP header offset */
size_t header_len = m->l2_len + m->l3_len + m->l4_len;
- const efx_nic_cfg_t *encp = efx_nic_cfg_get(txq->evq->sa->nic);
idx += SFC_EF10_TSO_OPT_DESCS_NUM;
- /*
- * The TCP header must start at most 208 bytes into the frame.
- * If it starts later than this then the NIC won't realise
- * it's a TCP packet and TSO edits won't be applied
- */
- if (unlikely(tcph_off > encp->enc_tx_tso_tcp_header_offset_limit))
- return EMSGSIZE;
-
header_paddr = rte_pktmbuf_iova(m);
/*
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c
index 16fd220bf..e128bff90 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c
@@ -698,15 +698,19 @@ sfc_efx_tx_maybe_insert_tag(struct sfc_efx_txq *txq, struct rte_mbuf *m,
}
static uint16_t
-sfc_efx_prepare_pkts(__rte_unused void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
+sfc_efx_prepare_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
uint16_t nb_pkts)
{
+ struct sfc_dp_txq *dp_txq = tx_queue;
+ struct sfc_efx_txq *txq = sfc_efx_txq_by_dp_txq(dp_txq);
+ const efx_nic_cfg_t *encp = efx_nic_cfg_get(txq->evq->sa->nic);
uint16_t i;
for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
int ret;
- ret = sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(tx_pkts[i]);
+ ret = sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(tx_pkts[i],
+ encp->enc_tx_tso_tcp_header_offset_limit);
if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
rte_errno = ret;
break;
@@ -776,14 +780,10 @@ sfc_efx_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
*/
if (sfc_efx_tso_do(txq, added, &m_seg, &in_off, &pend,
&pkt_descs, &pkt_len) != 0) {
- /* We may have reached this place for
- * one of the following reasons:
- *
- * 1) Packet header linearization is needed
- * and the header length is greater
- * than SFC_TSOH_STD_LEN
- * 2) TCP header starts at more then
- * 208 bytes into the frame
+ /* We may have reached this place if packet
+ * header linearization is needed but the
+ * header length is greater than
+ * SFC_TSOH_STD_LEN
*
* We will deceive RTE saying that we have sent
* the packet, but we will actually drop it.
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-02 9:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/12] net/sfc: add Tx prepare and encapsulated TSO Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/12] net/sfc: improve TSO header length check in EFX datapath Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/12] net/sfc: improve TSO header length check in EF10 datapath Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/12] net/sfc: make TSO descriptor numbers EF10-specific Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/12] net/sfc: support Tx preparation in EFX datapath Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/12] net/sfc: support Tx preparation in EF10 datapath Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/12] net/sfc: support Tx preparation in EF10 simple datapath Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/12] net/sfc: move TSO header checks from Tx burst to Tx prepare Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/12] net/sfc: introduce descriptor space check in " Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/12] net/sfc: add TSO header length check to " Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/12] net/sfc: factor out function to get IPv4 packet ID for TSO Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/12] net/sfc: improve log message about missing HW TSO support Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/12] net/sfc: support tunnel TSO on EF10 native Tx datapath Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02 9:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-03 18:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/12] net/sfc: add Tx prepare and encapsulated TSO Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-03 18:03 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1554197324-32391-8-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).