From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: Andrius Sirvys <andrius.sirvys@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>,
stable@dpdk.org, ciara.power@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] usertools: replace unsafe input function
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:58:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c971d9bd-ea05-d506-5d03-e38404e746b8@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190403145852.-nE1fqTD1zBYwjuo47xxB7HHnqj0uCQv4LQRUxZCATU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <788abf93-a33f-3a72-9bc1-cc6725336859@intel.com>
On 03-Apr-19 3:48 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 03-Apr-19 3:29 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>> On 03-Apr-19 2:30 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:44:40AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>>>> On 20-Mar-19 4:43 PM, Andrius Sirvys wrote:
>>>>> LGTM static code analysis tool reports that the function 'input' is
>>>>> unsafe. Changed to use raw_input which then converts it using
>>>>> ast.literal_eval() which is safe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: d1b94da4a4e0 ("usertools: add client script for telemetry")
>>>>> Cc: ciara.power@intel.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrius Sirvys <andrius.sirvys@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> usertools/dpdk-telemetry-client.py | 4 ++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/usertools/dpdk-telemetry-client.py
>>>>> b/usertools/dpdk-telemetry-client.py
>>>>> index ce0c7a9..c3ba77d 100755
>>>>> --- a/usertools/dpdk-telemetry-client.py
>>>>> +++ b/usertools/dpdk-telemetry-client.py
>>>>> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ def requestMetrics(self): # Requests metrics for
>>>>> given client
>>>>> def repeatedlyRequestMetrics(self, sleep_time): #
>>>>> Recursively requests metrics for given client
>>>>> print("\nPlease enter the number of times you'd like to
>>>>> continuously request Metrics:")
>>>>> - n_requests = int(input("\n:"))
>>>>> + n_requests = int(ast.literal_eval(raw_input("\n:")))
>>>>> print("\033[F") #Removes the user input from screen,
>>>>> cleans it up
>>>>> print("\033[K")
>>>>> for i in range(n_requests):
>>>>> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ def interactiveMenu(self, sleep_time): # Creates
>>>>> Interactive menu within the scr
>>>>> print("[3] Unregister client")
>>>>> try:
>>>>> - self.choice = int(input("\n:"))
>>>>> + self.choice = int(ast.literal_eval(raw_input("\n:")))
>>>>> print("\033[F") #Removes the user input for
>>>>> screen, cleans it up
>>>>> print("\033[K")
>>>>> if self.choice == 1:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> raw_input doesn't exist in Python 3.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you should do this at the top of the script:
>>>>
>>>> try:
>>>> raw_input # Python 2
>>>> except NameError:
>>>> raw_input = input # Python 3
>>>>
>>>> That way, all calls to raw_input will call the intended function.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The suggested way in the python docs is a little different:
>>>
>>> https://python-future.org/compatible_idioms.html#raw_input()
>>>
>>
>> Or that :)
>>
>
> Actually, this requires a dependency. "future" appears to be
> preinstalled on most distributions, but "builtins" isn't. In fact, i
> can't even find it in pip.
>
So, it does work on python2 and python3, however it indeed requires a
"future" package to be install through pip, which makes it an external
dependency. The way i have quoted above doesn't require the 'future'
package. I'm of no opinion on whether we should make the 'future'
package a requirement for all of our Python code, however if we were to
use this, it adds one extra step during setup and thus should be documented.
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-03 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-20 16:43 Andrius Sirvys
2019-03-20 16:43 ` Andrius Sirvys
2019-04-03 10:31 ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-04-03 10:31 ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-04-03 10:44 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-03 10:44 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-03 13:30 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-03 13:30 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-03 14:29 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-03 14:29 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-03 14:48 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-03 14:48 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-03 14:58 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2019-04-03 14:58 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-03 15:10 ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-04-03 15:10 ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-04-08 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Andrius Sirvys
2019-04-08 13:40 ` Andrius Sirvys
2019-04-09 9:10 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-09 9:10 ` Burakov, Anatoly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c971d9bd-ea05-d506-5d03-e38404e746b8@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=andrius.sirvys@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).