DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org,
	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] examples/vhost_scsi: fix missing NULL-check for parameter
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:37:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190408093707.GA1734@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190408093707.FzgJetohikzeHnyrPLXaN4DlfnEPEOykY60WqZLrn6o@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408033110.GB20719@dpdk-tbie.sh.intel.com>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 11:31:11AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 03:37:06PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > Coverity points out that there is a check in the main thread loop for the
> > ctrlr->bdev being NULL, but by that stage the pointer has already been
> > dereferenced. Therefore, for safety, before we enter the loop do an
> > initial check on the parameter structure.
> > 
> > Coverity issue: 158657
> > Fixes: db75c7af19bb ("examples/vhost_scsi: introduce a new sample app")
> > CC: stable@dpdk.org
> > CC: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> > CC: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> > CC: Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  examples/vhost_scsi/vhost_scsi.c | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/examples/vhost_scsi/vhost_scsi.c b/examples/vhost_scsi/vhost_scsi.c
> > index 2908ff68b..a6465d089 100644
> > --- a/examples/vhost_scsi/vhost_scsi.c
> > +++ b/examples/vhost_scsi/vhost_scsi.c
> > @@ -285,6 +285,12 @@ ctrlr_worker(void *arg)
> >  	cpu_set_t cpuset;
> >  	pthread_t thread;
> >  
> > +	if (ctrlr == NULL || ctrlr->bdev == NULL) {
> > +		fprintf(stdout, "%s: Error, invalid argument passed to worker thread\n",
> 
> Might be better to print to stderr.
> 
Yes, this looks a typo on my part.

> > +				__func__);
> > +		return NULL;
> 
> Might be better to exit() directly like what the other
> error handling in this thread does:
> 
> https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/blob/bdcfcceb7a0b7534a0dba669279d18bd0f98d5e5/examples/vhost_scsi/vhost_scsi.c#L296-L299
> 
> Otherwise destroy_device() will hang on sem_wait(&exit_sem):
> 
> https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/blob/bdcfcceb7a0b7534a0dba669279d18bd0f98d5e5/examples/vhost_scsi/vhost_scsi.c#L390
> 
Ok, will change in next revision

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-08  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-05 13:45 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] some small fixes Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 13:45 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] examples/vhost_scsi: fix header check for meson build Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 13:45   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] examples/vhost_scsi: fix missing NULL-check for parameter Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 13:45   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] net/i40e: fix dereference before NULL check in mbuf release Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 13:45   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:08   ` Rami Rosen
2019-04-05 14:08     ` Rami Rosen
2019-04-05 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] app/testpmd: fix variable use before NULL check Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 13:45   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:13   ` Rami Rosen
2019-04-05 14:13     ` Rami Rosen
2019-04-05 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] net/i40e: fix dereference before check when getting EEPROM Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 13:45   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:19   ` Rami Rosen
2019-04-05 14:19     ` Rami Rosen
2019-04-05 14:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] some small fixes Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:37   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:37   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] examples/vhost_scsi: fix header check for meson build Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:37     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  3:23     ` Tiwei Bie
2019-04-08  3:23       ` Tiwei Bie
2019-04-05 14:37   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] examples/vhost_scsi: fix missing NULL-check for parameter Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:37     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  3:31     ` Tiwei Bie
2019-04-08  3:31       ` Tiwei Bie
2019-04-08  9:37       ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2019-04-08  9:37         ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:37   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/i40e: fix dereference before NULL check in mbuf release Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:37     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:37   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] app/testpmd: fix variable use before NULL check Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:37     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:37   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/i40e: fix dereference before check when getting EEPROM Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 14:37     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] some small fixes Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  9:46   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  9:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] examples/vhost_scsi: fix header check for meson build Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  9:46     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  9:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] examples/vhost_scsi: fix missing NULL-check for parameter Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  9:46     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-09  1:53     ` Tiwei Bie
2019-04-09  1:53       ` Tiwei Bie
2019-04-08  9:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] net/i40e: fix dereference before NULL check in mbuf release Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  9:46     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  9:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] app/testpmd: fix variable use before NULL check Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  9:46     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  9:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] net/i40e: fix dereference before check when getting EEPROM Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08  9:46     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-22 21:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] some small fixes Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-22 21:49     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190408093707.GA1734@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).