From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F13A0096 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:11:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AA62C54; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:11:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4E52C24 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:11:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2019 08:11:33 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,325,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="129579887" Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.155]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2019 08:11:32 -0700 Received: from irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.31]) by IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.21]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:11:31 +0100 From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" To: Vivian Kong , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] Function name collision on bpf_validate Thread-Index: AQHU7hJpMK1nNTEKxUOGUBeyu6WysaYyWOPw Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:11:31 +0000 Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580148A94616@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZDI3MzQwYWEtNzIzNi00NDExLWE2YzMtODgwNTBmMmYyODdhIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiY3pcL1BpazNsalRcL0hsY2JDb0NoRldVbWoxeUZobFdhWWZDbVFiSVRFZCtcLzJjR0Y5SjZlMjFsVFN4ZHB2RWZnZCJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.600.7 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Function name collision on bpf_validate X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190408151131.CvonXSBFhAuyHNalC1mMmTsHYkueKCmBhLMLowBiwQM@z> Hi Vivian, >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Has anyone run into this issue with bpf_validate? We have an application > that links to both DPDK and libpcap and both define bpf_validate. Didn't hit such issue so far. Could you provide some basic way to reproduce it? Thanks Konstantin > I > couldn't find other complaints on this so I'm wondering what would be the > best way to handle this? >=20 > Thanks and I appreciate for your input. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Vivian Kong > Linux on IBM Z Open Source Ecosystem > IBM Canada Toronto Lab