From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>, Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] acl: adjust the tests
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:24:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190408182420.4398-4-aconole@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190408182420.Dif_6JNc3SSJOg0_wB4JsNagEkN4Wm2pOaAeUe7ZQ-0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408182420.4398-1-aconole@redhat.com>
This makes the tests pass, and also ensures that on platforms where the
testing is supported, we can properly test the implementation specific
code. One edge case is when we run on x86_64 systems that don't support
AVX2, but where the compiler can generate such instructions. That could
be an enhancement in the future, but for now at least the tests will
pass.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
---
app/test/test_acl.c | 62 +++++++++++++--------------------
lib/librte_acl/Makefile | 1 +
lib/librte_acl/acl_run_notsup.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/librte_acl/meson.build | 4 +--
4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 lib/librte_acl/acl_run_notsup.c
diff --git a/app/test/test_acl.c b/app/test/test_acl.c
index b1f75d1bc..c44faa251 100644
--- a/app/test/test_acl.c
+++ b/app/test/test_acl.c
@@ -408,6 +408,9 @@ test_classify(void)
return -1;
}
+ /* Always use the scalar testing for now. */
+ rte_acl_set_ctx_classify(acx, RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_SCALAR);
+
ret = 0;
for (i = 0; i != TEST_CLASSIFY_ITER; i++) {
@@ -547,6 +550,7 @@ test_build_ports_range(void)
for (i = 0; i != RTE_DIM(test_data); i++)
data[i] = (uint8_t *)&test_data[i];
+ rte_acl_set_ctx_classify(acx, RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_SCALAR);
for (i = 0; i != RTE_DIM(test_rules); i++) {
rte_acl_reset(acx);
ret = test_classify_buid(acx, test_rules, i + 1);
@@ -911,6 +915,8 @@ test_convert_rules(const char *desc,
return -1;
}
+ rte_acl_set_ctx_classify(acx, RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_SCALAR);
+
rc = convert_rules(acx, convert, acl_test_rules,
RTE_DIM(acl_test_rules));
if (rc != 0)
@@ -1352,7 +1358,7 @@ test_invalid_parameters(void)
struct rte_acl_param param;
struct rte_acl_ctx *acx;
struct rte_acl_ipv4vlan_rule rule;
- int result;
+ int i, result;
uint32_t layout[RTE_ACL_IPV4VLAN_NUM] = {0};
@@ -1513,45 +1519,25 @@ test_invalid_parameters(void)
return -1;
}
- /* SSE classify test */
-
- /* cover zero categories in classify (should not fail) */
- result = rte_acl_classify(acx, NULL, NULL, 0, 0);
- if (result != 0) {
- printf("Line %i: SSE classify with zero categories "
- "failed!\n", __LINE__);
- rte_acl_free(acx);
- return -1;
- }
-
- /* cover invalid but positive categories in classify */
- result = rte_acl_classify(acx, NULL, NULL, 0, 3);
- if (result == 0) {
- printf("Line %i: SSE classify with 3 categories "
- "should have failed!\n", __LINE__);
- rte_acl_free(acx);
- return -1;
- }
-
- /* scalar classify test */
+ for (i = RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_DEFAULT; i < RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_NUM; ++i) {
+ rte_acl_set_ctx_classify(acx, i); /* set up the classify code */
- /* cover zero categories in classify (should not fail) */
- result = rte_acl_classify_alg(acx, NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
- RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_SCALAR);
- if (result != 0) {
- printf("Line %i: Scalar classify with zero categories "
- "failed!\n", __LINE__);
- rte_acl_free(acx);
- return -1;
- }
+ /* cover zero categories in classify (should not fail) */
+ result = rte_acl_classify(acx, NULL, NULL, 0, 0);
+ if (result != 0 && result != -ENOTSUP) {
+ printf("AGL: %d, ACL classify with zero categories failed: %d!\n",
+ i, result);
+ return -1;
+ }
- /* cover invalid but positive categories in classify */
- result = rte_acl_classify(acx, NULL, NULL, 0, 3);
- if (result == 0) {
- printf("Line %i: Scalar classify with 3 categories "
- "should have failed!\n", __LINE__);
- rte_acl_free(acx);
- return -1;
+ /* cover invalid but positive categories in classify */
+ result = rte_acl_classify(acx, NULL, NULL, 0, 3);
+ /* we don't check for -ENOTSUP here, since it is a failure */
+ if (result == 0) {
+ printf("AGL: %d, ACL classify with 3 categories should fail!\n",
+ i);
+ return -1;
+ }
}
/* free ACL context */
diff --git a/lib/librte_acl/Makefile b/lib/librte_acl/Makefile
index ea5edf00a..c5dfdb832 100644
--- a/lib/librte_acl/Makefile
+++ b/lib/librte_acl/Makefile
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL) += rte_acl.c
SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL) += acl_bld.c
SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL) += acl_gen.c
SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL) += acl_run_scalar.c
+SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL) += acl_run_notsup.c
ifneq ($(filter y,$(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM) $(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM64)),)
SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL) += acl_run_neon.c
diff --git a/lib/librte_acl/acl_run_notsup.c b/lib/librte_acl/acl_run_notsup.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2bcc6e67f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/librte_acl/acl_run_notsup.c
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+#include <rte_acl.h>
+#include "acl.h"
+
+/*
+ * If the compiler doesn't support AVX2 instructions,
+ * then the dummy one would be used instead for AVX2 classify method.
+ */
+int __rte_weak
+rte_acl_classify_avx2(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
+ __rte_unused const uint8_t **data,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t *results,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t num,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t categories)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+}
+
+int __rte_weak
+rte_acl_classify_sse(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
+ __rte_unused const uint8_t **data,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t *results,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t num,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t categories)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+}
+
+int __rte_weak
+rte_acl_classify_neon(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
+ __rte_unused const uint8_t **data,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t *results,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t num,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t categories)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+}
+
+int __rte_weak
+rte_acl_classify_altivec(__rte_unused const struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx,
+ __rte_unused const uint8_t **data,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t *results,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t num,
+ __rte_unused uint32_t categories)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+}
diff --git a/lib/librte_acl/meson.build b/lib/librte_acl/meson.build
index 03c19e4e5..fc8689aa9 100644
--- a/lib/librte_acl/meson.build
+++ b/lib/librte_acl/meson.build
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
# Copyright(c) 2017 Intel Corporation
version = 2
-sources = files('acl_bld.c', 'acl_gen.c', 'acl_run_scalar.c',
- 'rte_acl.c', 'tb_mem.c')
+sources = files('acl_bld.c', 'acl_gen.c', 'acl_run_notsup.c',
+ 'acl_run_scalar.c', 'rte_acl.c', 'tb_mem.c')
headers = files('rte_acl.h', 'rte_acl_osdep.h')
if arch_subdir == 'x86'
--
2.19.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 18:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] librte_acl: fixes related to testing with the meson build Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] acl: fix arm argument types Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 14:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-10 14:39 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-10 15:52 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 15:52 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 16:07 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-10 16:07 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-10 17:20 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 17:20 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-30 12:57 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-30 12:57 ` Aaron Conole
2019-06-05 15:16 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-06-05 17:09 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] acl: update the build for multi-arch Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2019-04-08 18:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] acl: adjust the tests Aaron Conole
2019-04-09 8:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-09 8:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-09 13:01 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-09 13:01 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-09 16:03 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-09 16:03 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-09 17:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-09 17:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-10 8:13 ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-04-10 8:13 ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-04-10 13:10 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 13:10 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 13:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 13:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 13:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 13:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-09 17:05 ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-04-09 17:05 ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-04-09 18:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-09 18:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-10 9:06 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 9:06 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08 20:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] librte_acl: fixes related to testing with the meson build Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 20:40 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190408182420.4398-4-aconole@redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).