From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>, Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] acl: adjust the tests
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 08:41:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580148A94A44@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190409084141.DSbnS1XDFwH4KzVDqbIWF5lshmp7nbT9Fk2a0Nos3f0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408182420.4398-4-aconole@redhat.com>
Hi Aaron,
>
> This makes the tests pass, and also ensures that on platforms where the
> testing is supported, we can properly test the implementation specific
> code. One edge case is when we run on x86_64 systems that don't support
> AVX2, but where the compiler can generate such instructions. That could
> be an enhancement in the future, but for now at least the tests will
> pass.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_acl.c | 62 +++++++++++++--------------------
> lib/librte_acl/Makefile | 1 +
> lib/librte_acl/acl_run_notsup.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_acl/meson.build | 4 +--
> 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 lib/librte_acl/acl_run_notsup.c
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_acl.c b/app/test/test_acl.c
> index b1f75d1bc..c44faa251 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_acl.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_acl.c
> @@ -408,6 +408,9 @@ test_classify(void)
> return -1;
> }
>
> + /* Always use the scalar testing for now. */
> + rte_acl_set_ctx_classify(acx, RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_SCALAR);
> +
> ret = 0;
> for (i = 0; i != TEST_CLASSIFY_ITER; i++) {
>
> @@ -547,6 +550,7 @@ test_build_ports_range(void)
> for (i = 0; i != RTE_DIM(test_data); i++)
> data[i] = (uint8_t *)&test_data[i];
>
> + rte_acl_set_ctx_classify(acx, RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_SCALAR);
> for (i = 0; i != RTE_DIM(test_rules); i++) {
> rte_acl_reset(acx);
> ret = test_classify_buid(acx, test_rules, i + 1);
> @@ -911,6 +915,8 @@ test_convert_rules(const char *desc,
> return -1;
> }
>
> + rte_acl_set_ctx_classify(acx, RTE_ACL_CLASSIFY_SCALAR);
> +
As I understand here and above, on x86 you replaced default algo (SSE, AVX2)
with scalar one, right?
That looks like reduction of test coverage for x86.
Konstantin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-09 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 18:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] librte_acl: fixes related to testing with the meson build Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] acl: fix arm argument types Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 14:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-10 14:39 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-10 15:52 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 15:52 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 16:07 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-10 16:07 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-10 17:20 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 17:20 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-30 12:57 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-30 12:57 ` Aaron Conole
2019-06-05 15:16 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-06-05 17:09 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] acl: update the build for multi-arch Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] acl: adjust the tests Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 18:24 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-09 8:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2019-04-09 8:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-09 13:01 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-09 13:01 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-09 16:03 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-09 16:03 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-09 17:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-09 17:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-10 8:13 ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-04-10 8:13 ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-04-10 13:10 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 13:10 ` Aaron Conole
2019-04-10 13:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 13:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 13:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 13:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-09 17:05 ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-04-09 17:05 ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-04-09 18:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-09 18:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-10 9:06 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 9:06 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-08 20:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] librte_acl: fixes related to testing with the meson build Aaron Conole
2019-04-08 20:40 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580148A94A44@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).