From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
To: "Lin, Xueqin" <xueqin.lin@intel.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
"Li, WenjieX A" <wenjiex.a.li@intel.com>,
"Wang, FengqinX" <fengqinx.wang@intel.com>,
"Yao, Lei A" <lei.a.yao@intel.com>,
"Wang, Yinan" <yinan.wang@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
"Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
"alialnu@mellanox.com" <alialnu@mellanox.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] app/testpmd: move pkt prepare logic into a separate function
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:32:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR1801MB186319A2F80D0D3412C6180FDE2D0@CY4PR1801MB1863.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190409093256.LKlOUd9Gd51Vzy06oqPwluKUYja9QnQWWfcODveIpQ4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0D300480287911409D9FF92C1FA2A3355B4D2DE1@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Lin,
Can you check if the following patch fixes the issue?
http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/52395/
I wasn't able to catch this earlier.
Regards,
Pavan.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lin, Xueqin <xueqin.lin@intel.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 2:58 PM
>To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>; Yigit, Ferruh
><ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Li, WenjieX A
><wenjiex.a.li@intel.com>; Wang, FengqinX <fengqinx.wang@intel.com>; Yao,
>Lei A <lei.a.yao@intel.com>; Wang, Yinan <yinan.wang@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob
>Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; thomas@monjalon.net;
>arybchenko@solarflare.com; Iremonger, Bernard
><bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; alialnu@mellanox.com; Zhang, Qi Z
><qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
>Subject: [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] app/testpmd: move pkt prepare
>logic into a separate function
>
>External Email
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Hi NIkhilesh,
>
>This patchset impacts some of 19.05 rc1 txonly/burst tests on Intel NIC. If set
>txonly fwd, IXIA or tester peer can't receive packets that sent from app
>generated.
>This is high issue, block some cases test. Detailed information as below, need
>you to check it soon.
>
>*DPDK version: 19.05.0-rc1
>*NIC hardware: Fortville_eagle/Fortville_spirit/Niantic
>Environment: one NIC port connect with another NIC port, or one NIC port
>connect with IXIA
>
>Test Setup
>1. Bind port to igb_uio or vfio
>2. On DUT, setup testpmd:
> ./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/testpmd -c 0x1e -n 4 -- -i --rxq=4 --txq=4 --
>port-topology=loop 3. Set txonly forward, start testpmd
>testpmd>set fwd txonly
>testpmd>start
>4. Dump packets from tester NIC port or IXIA, find no packets were received on
>the PORT0.
>tcpdump -i <tester_interface> -v
>
>Best regards,
>Xueqin
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Pavan Nikhilesh
>> Bhagavatula
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 5:54 PM
>> To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
>> thomas@monjalon.net; arybchenko@solarflare.com; Yigit, Ferruh
>> <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Iremonger, Bernard
>> <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; alialnu@mellanox.com
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
>> <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] app/testpmd: move pkt prepare logic
>> into a separate function
>>
>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>>
>> Move the packet prepare logic into a separate function so that it can
>> be reused later.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/txonly.c | 163
>> +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/txonly.c b/app/test-pmd/txonly.c index
>> 65171c1d1..56ca0ad24 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/txonly.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/txonly.c
>> @@ -148,6 +148,80 @@ setup_pkt_udp_ip_headers(struct ipv4_hdr *ip_hdr,
>> ip_hdr->hdr_checksum = (uint16_t) ip_cksum; }
>>
>> +static inline bool
>> +pkt_burst_prepare(struct rte_mbuf *pkt, struct rte_mempool *mbp,
>> + struct ether_hdr *eth_hdr, const uint16_t vlan_tci,
>> + const uint16_t vlan_tci_outer, const uint64_t ol_flags) {
>> + struct rte_mbuf *pkt_segs[RTE_MAX_SEGS_PER_PKT];
>> + uint8_t ip_var = RTE_PER_LCORE(_ip_var);
>> + struct rte_mbuf *pkt_seg;
>> + uint32_t nb_segs, pkt_len;
>> + uint8_t i;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(tx_pkt_split == TX_PKT_SPLIT_RND))
>> + nb_segs = random() % tx_pkt_nb_segs + 1;
>> + else
>> + nb_segs = tx_pkt_nb_segs;
>> +
>> + if (nb_segs > 1) {
>> + if (rte_mempool_get_bulk(mbp, (void **)pkt_segs, nb_segs))
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rte_pktmbuf_reset_headroom(pkt);
>> + pkt->data_len = tx_pkt_seg_lengths[0];
>> + pkt->ol_flags = ol_flags;
>> + pkt->vlan_tci = vlan_tci;
>> + pkt->vlan_tci_outer = vlan_tci_outer;
>> + pkt->l2_len = sizeof(struct ether_hdr);
>> + pkt->l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
>> +
>> + pkt_len = pkt->data_len;
>> + pkt_seg = pkt;
>> + for (i = 1; i < nb_segs; i++) {
>> + pkt_seg->next = pkt_segs[i - 1];
>> + pkt_seg = pkt_seg->next;
>> + pkt_seg->data_len = tx_pkt_seg_lengths[i];
>> + pkt_len += pkt_seg->data_len;
>> + }
>> + pkt_seg->next = NULL; /* Last segment of packet. */
>> + /*
>> + * Copy headers in first packet segment(s).
>> + */
>> + copy_buf_to_pkt(eth_hdr, sizeof(eth_hdr), pkt, 0);
>> + copy_buf_to_pkt(&pkt_ip_hdr, sizeof(pkt_ip_hdr), pkt,
>> + sizeof(struct ether_hdr));
>> + if (txonly_multi_flow) {
>> + struct ipv4_hdr *ip_hdr;
>> + uint32_t addr;
>> +
>> + ip_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(pkt,
>> + struct ipv4_hdr *,
>> + sizeof(struct ether_hdr));
>> + /*
>> + * Generate multiple flows by varying IP src addr. This
>> + * enables packets are well distributed by RSS in
>> + * receiver side if any and txonly mode can be a decent
>> + * packet generator for developer's quick performance
>> + * regression test.
>> + */
>> + addr = (IP_DST_ADDR | (ip_var++ << 8)) + rte_lcore_id();
>> + ip_hdr->src_addr = rte_cpu_to_be_32(addr);
>> + }
>> + copy_buf_to_pkt(&pkt_udp_hdr, sizeof(pkt_udp_hdr), pkt,
>> + sizeof(struct ether_hdr) +
>> + sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr));
>> + /*
>> + * Complete first mbuf of packet and append it to the
>> + * burst of packets to be transmitted.
>> + */
>> + pkt->nb_segs = nb_segs;
>> + pkt->pkt_len = pkt_len;
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Transmit a burst of multi-segments packets.
>> */
>> @@ -155,10 +229,8 @@ static void
>> pkt_burst_transmit(struct fwd_stream *fs) {
>> struct rte_mbuf *pkts_burst[MAX_PKT_BURST];
>> - struct rte_mbuf *pkt_segs[RTE_MAX_SEGS_PER_PKT];
>> struct rte_port *txp;
>> struct rte_mbuf *pkt;
>> - struct rte_mbuf *pkt_seg;
>> struct rte_mempool *mbp;
>> struct ether_hdr eth_hdr;
>> uint16_t nb_tx;
>> @@ -166,15 +238,12 @@ pkt_burst_transmit(struct fwd_stream *fs)
>> uint16_t vlan_tci, vlan_tci_outer;
>> uint32_t retry;
>> uint64_t ol_flags = 0;
>> - uint8_t ip_var = RTE_PER_LCORE(_ip_var);
>> - uint8_t i;
>> uint64_t tx_offloads;
>> #ifdef RTE_TEST_PMD_RECORD_CORE_CYCLES
>> uint64_t start_tsc;
>> uint64_t end_tsc;
>> uint64_t core_cycles;
>> #endif
>> - uint32_t nb_segs, pkt_len;
>>
>> #ifdef RTE_TEST_PMD_RECORD_CORE_CYCLES
>> start_tsc = rte_rdtsc();
>> @@ -201,85 +270,19 @@ pkt_burst_transmit(struct fwd_stream *fs)
>>
>> for (nb_pkt = 0; nb_pkt < nb_pkt_per_burst; nb_pkt++) {
>> pkt = rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(mbp);
>> - if (pkt == NULL) {
>> - nomore_mbuf:
>> - if (nb_pkt == 0)
>> - return;
>> + if (pkt == NULL)
>> + break;
>> + if (unlikely(!pkt_burst_prepare(pkt, mbp, ð_hdr, vlan_tci,
>> + vlan_tci_outer, ol_flags))) {
>> + rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
>> break;
>> }
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * Using raw alloc is good to improve performance,
>> - * but some consumers may use the headroom and so
>> - * decrement data_off. We need to make sure it is
>> - * reset to default value.
>> - */
>> - rte_pktmbuf_reset_headroom(pkt);
>> - pkt->data_len = tx_pkt_seg_lengths[0];
>> - pkt_seg = pkt;
>> -
>> - if (tx_pkt_split == TX_PKT_SPLIT_RND)
>> - nb_segs = random() % tx_pkt_nb_segs + 1;
>> - else
>> - nb_segs = tx_pkt_nb_segs;
>> -
>> - if (nb_segs > 1) {
>> - if (rte_mempool_get_bulk(mbp, (void **)pkt_segs,
>> - nb_segs)) {
>> - rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
>> - goto nomore_mbuf;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> - pkt_len = pkt->data_len;
>> - for (i = 1; i < nb_segs; i++) {
>> - pkt_seg->next = pkt_segs[i - 1];
>> - pkt_seg = pkt_seg->next;
>> - pkt_seg->data_len = tx_pkt_seg_lengths[i];
>> - pkt_len += pkt_seg->data_len;
>> - }
>> - pkt_seg->next = NULL; /* Last segment of packet. */
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * Copy headers in first packet segment(s).
>> - */
>> - copy_buf_to_pkt(ð_hdr, sizeof(eth_hdr), pkt, 0);
>> - copy_buf_to_pkt(&pkt_ip_hdr, sizeof(pkt_ip_hdr), pkt,
>> - sizeof(struct ether_hdr));
>> - if (txonly_multi_flow) {
>> - struct ipv4_hdr *ip_hdr;
>> - uint32_t addr;
>> -
>> - ip_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(pkt,
>> - struct ipv4_hdr *,
>> - sizeof(struct ether_hdr));
>> - /*
>> - * Generate multiple flows by varying IP src addr. This
>> - * enables packets are well distributed by RSS in
>> - * receiver side if any and txonly mode can be a
>> decent
>> - * packet generator for developer's quick
>> performance
>> - * regression test.
>> - */
>> - addr = (IP_DST_ADDR | (ip_var++ << 8)) +
>> rte_lcore_id();
>> - ip_hdr->src_addr = rte_cpu_to_be_32(addr);
>> - }
>> - copy_buf_to_pkt(&pkt_udp_hdr, sizeof(pkt_udp_hdr), pkt,
>> - sizeof(struct ether_hdr) +
>> - sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr));
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * Complete first mbuf of packet and append it to the
>> - * burst of packets to be transmitted.
>> - */
>> - pkt->nb_segs = nb_segs;
>> - pkt->pkt_len = pkt_len;
>> - pkt->ol_flags = ol_flags;
>> - pkt->vlan_tci = vlan_tci;
>> - pkt->vlan_tci_outer = vlan_tci_outer;
>> - pkt->l2_len = sizeof(struct ether_hdr);
>> - pkt->l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
>> pkts_burst[nb_pkt] = pkt;
>> }
>> +
>> + if (nb_pkt == 0)
>> + return;
>> +
>> nb_tx = rte_eth_tx_burst(fs->tx_port, fs->tx_queue, pkts_burst,
>> nb_pkt);
>> /*
>> * Retry if necessary
>> --
>> 2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-09 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 19:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: use mempool bulk get for txonly mode Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-01 7:38 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-03-01 8:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-01 13:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: add " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-19 16:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-19 16:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-20 4:53 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-20 4:53 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-26 8:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-26 8:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-26 11:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-26 11:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-26 11:50 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-03-26 11:50 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-03-26 12:06 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-26 12:06 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-26 13:16 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-03-26 13:16 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-03-26 12:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] app/testpmd: optimize testpmd " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-26 12:26 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-26 12:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] app/testpmd: add mempool bulk get for " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-26 12:27 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-26 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: optimize testpmd " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-26 13:03 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-26 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] app/testpmd: add mempool bulk get for " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-26 13:03 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-26 16:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] app/testpmd: optimize testpmd " Iremonger, Bernard
2019-03-26 16:13 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-03-31 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-31 13:14 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-31 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] app/testpmd: add mempool bulk get for " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-31 13:14 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-01 20:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] app/testpmd: optimize testpmd " Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-01 20:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-01 20:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 20:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-02 1:03 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-02 1:03 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-02 7:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-02 7:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-02 8:31 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-02 8:31 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-02 9:03 ` Ali Alnubani
2019-04-02 9:03 ` Ali Alnubani
2019-04-02 9:06 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-02 9:06 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-02 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] app/testpmd: move eth header generation outside the loop Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-02 9:53 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-02 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] app/testpmd: use bulk ops for allocating segments Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-02 9:53 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-02 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] app/testpmd: move pkt prepare logic into a separate function Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-02 9:53 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-09 9:28 ` Lin, Xueqin
2019-04-09 9:28 ` Lin, Xueqin
2019-04-09 9:32 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula [this message]
2019-04-09 9:32 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-09 12:24 ` Yao, Lei A
2019-04-09 12:24 ` Yao, Lei A
2019-04-09 12:29 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-09 12:29 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] app/testpmd: add mempool bulk get for txonly mode Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-02 9:53 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-02 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] app/testpmd: move eth header generation outside the loop Raslan Darawsheh
2019-04-02 15:21 ` Raslan Darawsheh
2019-04-04 16:23 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-04 16:23 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-05 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-05 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CY4PR1801MB186319A2F80D0D3412C6180FDE2D0@CY4PR1801MB1863.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=alialnu@mellanox.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengqinx.wang@intel.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=lei.a.yao@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wenjiex.a.li@intel.com \
--cc=xueqin.lin@intel.com \
--cc=yinan.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).