DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Weiser <martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com>
To: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] i40e rte_eth_link_get_nowait() on X722 returns wrong link_speed value 20000 instead of 10000
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:20:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <71f2b044-b99b-be8c-8468-a38c8c42713c@allegro-packets.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190409112045.5tw_Czo-bAompfD-C5Gv2O_vNPiK-zk-h439BSfxAJU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dbd6628f-8ff0-d98a-6c34-a25e6d06218b@allegro-packets.com>

Hi,

just bumping this since there has been no reply at all for a long time.
Would it be better if I opened a bug for this?

Best,
Martin


Am 22.01.19 um 16:07 schrieb Martin Weiser:
> Hi,
>
> We are using a Xeon D with an integrated X722 NIC that provides two
> ports of 8086:37d2 and two ports of 8086:37d0. All four ports show the
> same behavior: they return a link speed value of 20000 for a 10Gbps link.
>
> This only seems to happen when internally the update_link_reg() function
> in i40e_ethdev.c is used. This requires the application to use the
> rte_eth_link_get_nowait() function and not use link status change
> interrupts.
> If you use e.g. testpmd with the option --no-lsc-interrupt you can
> reproduce the behavior since it will suddenly show a link speed of 20000
> Mbps instead of 10000 Mbps.
>
>
> Here are two examples of the register values read by update_link_reg():
>
> A 10Gbps link which produces the wrong link speed value:
>
> I40E_PRTMAC_LINKSTA: 0x60000080
> I40E_PRTMAC_MACC:    0x3d00
>
>
> A 1Gbps link which produces the correct link speed value:
>
> I40E_PRTMAC_LINKSTA: 0x48000081
> I40E_PRTMAC_MACC:    0x3d00
>
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>




  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-09 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-22 15:07 Martin Weiser
2019-04-09 11:20 ` Martin Weiser [this message]
2019-04-09 11:20   ` Martin Weiser
2019-04-10  5:22   ` Xing, Beilei
2019-04-10  5:22     ` Xing, Beilei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=71f2b044-b99b-be8c-8468-a38c8c42713c@allegro-packets.com \
    --to=martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).