From: Vivian Kong <vivkong@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 07/12] test: add support for s390x architecture
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 15:06:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190409190630.31975-8-vivkong@ca.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190409190630.31975-1-vivkong@ca.ibm.com>
Add big endian support for s390x architecture.
Signed-off-by: Vivian Kong <vivkong@ca.ibm.com>
---
app/test/test_cmdline_ipaddr.c | 13 +++-
app/test/test_cmdline_num.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h | 14 +++++
3 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_cmdline_ipaddr.c b/app/test/test_cmdline_ipaddr.c
index 8ee7f6288..5e7629bba 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cmdline_ipaddr.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cmdline_ipaddr.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <string.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
+#include <rte_byteorder.h>
#ifndef __linux__
#ifndef __FreeBSD__
@@ -22,7 +23,8 @@
#include "test_cmdline.h"
-#define IP4(a,b,c,d) {((uint32_t)(((a) & 0xff)) | \
+#if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#define IP4(a, b, c, d) {((uint32_t)(((a) & 0xff)) | \
(((b) & 0xff) << 8) | \
(((c) & 0xff) << 16) | \
((d) & 0xff) << 24)}
@@ -30,6 +32,15 @@
#define U16_SWAP(x) \
(((x & 0xFF) << 8) | ((x & 0xFF00) >> 8))
+#else
+#define IP4(a, b, c, d) {((uint32_t)(((a) & 0xff) << 24) | \
+ (((b) & 0xff) << 16) | \
+ (((c) & 0xff) << 8) | \
+ ((d) & 0xff))}
+
+#define U16_SWAP(x) x
+#endif
+
/* create IPv6 address, swapping bytes where needed */
#ifndef s6_addr16
# define s6_addr16 __u6_addr.__u6_addr16
diff --git a/app/test/test_cmdline_num.c b/app/test/test_cmdline_num.c
index 4c97caf3d..9e80397ac 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cmdline_num.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cmdline_num.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
#include <cmdline_parse.h>
#include <cmdline_parse_num.h>
+
+#include <rte_byteorder.h>
#include "test_cmdline.h"
struct num_unsigned_str {
@@ -451,6 +453,48 @@ test_parse_num_valid(void)
/* check if result matches what it should have matched
* since unsigned numbers don't care about number of bits, we can just convert
* everything to uint64_t without any worries. */
+ #if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_BIG_ENDIAN
+ switch (type) {
+ case UINT8:
+ {
+ uint8_t *temp = (uint8_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case UINT16:
+ {
+ uint16_t *temp = (uint16_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case UINT32:
+ {
+ uint32_t *temp = (uint32_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case INT8:
+ {
+ int8_t *temp = (int8_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case INT16:
+ {
+ int16_t *temp = (int16_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case INT32:
+ {
+ int32_t *temp = (int32_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ #endif
if (ret > 0 && num_valid_positive_strs[i].result != result) {
printf("Error: parsing %s as %s failed: result mismatch!\n",
num_valid_positive_strs[i].str, buf);
@@ -480,6 +524,7 @@ test_parse_num_valid(void)
* the result is signed in this case, so we have to account for that */
if (ret > 0) {
/* detect negative */
+ #if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
switch (type) {
case INT8:
result = (int8_t) result;
@@ -493,6 +538,30 @@ test_parse_num_valid(void)
default:
break;
}
+ #else
+ switch (type) {
+ case INT8:
+ {
+ int8_t *temp = (int8_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case INT16:
+ {
+ int16_t *temp = (int16_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case INT32:
+ {
+ int32_t *temp = (int32_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ #endif
if (num_valid_negative_strs[i].result == (int64_t) result)
continue;
printf("Error: parsing %s as %s failed: result mismatch!\n",
@@ -529,6 +598,48 @@ test_parse_num_valid(void)
/* check if result matches what it should have matched
* since unsigned numbers don't care about number of bits, we can just convert
* everything to uint64_t without any worries. */
+ #if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_BIG_ENDIAN
+ switch (type) {
+ case UINT8:
+ {
+ uint8_t *temp = (uint8_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case UINT16:
+ {
+ uint16_t *temp = (uint16_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case UINT32:
+ {
+ uint32_t *temp = (uint32_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case INT8:
+ {
+ int8_t *temp = (int8_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case INT16:
+ {
+ int16_t *temp = (int16_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ case INT32:
+ {
+ int32_t *temp = (int32_t *)&result;
+ result = *temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ #endif
if (ret > 0 && num_garbage_positive_strs[i].result != result) {
printf("Error: parsing %s as %s failed: result mismatch!\n",
num_garbage_positive_strs[i].str, buf);
diff --git a/app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h b/app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h
index 8bcf0b261..6d8cd1998 100644
--- a/app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h
+++ b/app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h
@@ -49,6 +49,20 @@ vect_set_epi32(int i3, int i2, int i1, int i0)
return data;
}
+#elif defined(RTE_ARCH_S390X)
+
+/* loads the xmm_t value from address p(does not need to be 16-byte aligned)*/
+#define vect_loadu_sil128(p) vec_xld2(0, (signed int *)p)
+
+/* sets the 4 signed 32-bit integer values and returns the xmm_t variable */
+static __rte_always_inline xmm_t
+vect_set_epi32(int i3, int i2, int i1, int i0)
+{
+ xmm_t data = (xmm_t){i0, i1, i2, i3};
+
+ return data;
+}
+
#endif
#endif /* _TEST_XMMT_OPS_H_ */
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-09 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-09 19:06 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/12] introduce " Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 01/12] mk: " Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:38 ` Luca Boccassi
2019-04-09 19:38 ` Luca Boccassi
2019-04-10 16:50 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-10 16:50 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 02/12] eal: add support for " Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 03/12] acl: " Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 04/12] lpm: " Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 05/12] examples/l3fwd: " Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 06/12] net/i40e: " Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong [this message]
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 07/12] test: " Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 08/12] hash: " Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-15 20:43 ` Dharmik Thakkar
2019-04-15 20:43 ` Dharmik Thakkar
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 09/12] doc: introduce " Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 20:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-09 20:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 16:52 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-10 16:52 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 10/12] ethdev: add cast for bus_device Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 20:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-09 20:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 2:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 2:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 17:10 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-10 17:10 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 11/12] mbuf: trivial fix Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 20:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-09 20:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-09 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 12/12] test: miscellaneous test fixes Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 19:06 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-09 20:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/12] introduce s390x architecture Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-09 20:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 17:09 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-10 17:09 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-10 17:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 17:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 19:15 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-10 19:15 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-10 19:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 19:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 20:45 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-10 20:45 ` Vivian Kong
2019-04-10 20:31 ` David Christensen
2019-04-10 20:31 ` David Christensen
2019-04-10 20:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 20:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 21:03 ` David Christensen
2019-04-10 21:03 ` David Christensen
2019-04-10 21:45 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-04-10 21:45 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-04-11 6:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-11 6:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-11 15:57 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-04-11 15:57 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
[not found] ` <OFB9049735.7E51096E-ON882583D9.00574783-882583D9.00579FE2@LocalDomain>
2019-04-18 21:06 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-04-18 21:06 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-04-18 21:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 21:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-11 7:45 ` David Marchand
2019-04-11 7:45 ` David Marchand
2019-05-15 12:45 ` David Marchand
2019-05-15 12:45 ` David Marchand
2020-02-18 21:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-20 0:20 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2020-02-21 13:33 ` Vivian Kong
2021-03-24 21:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190409190630.31975-8-vivkong@ca.ibm.com \
--to=vivkong@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=vivkong@ca.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).