From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81544A0096 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:20:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4083F7CDA; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:20:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1CA5F21 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:20:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3AJ9GtH084210 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:20:04 -0400 Received: from smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com [192.155.248.73]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rskxty804-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:20:03 -0400 Received: from localhost by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP for from ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:20:02 -0000 Received: from us1a3-smtp07.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com (10.146.103.14) by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (10.106.227.90) with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:19:58 -0000 Received: from us1a3-mail93.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com ([10.146.21.248]) by us1a3-smtp07.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com with ESMTP id 2019041019195791-932463 ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:19:57 +0000 In-Reply-To: <2013805.Te0adFJsA8@xps> To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org From: "Vivian Kong" Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:15:29 -0400 References: <20190409190630.31975-1-vivkong@ca.ibm.com> <1653640.BMqFjXm9Gv@xps> <2013805.Te0adFJsA8@xps> X-KeepSent: B3643D9E:33CB381E-852583D8:00689360; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1EXT SHF993 September 20, 2018 X-LLNOutbound: False X-Disclaimed: 58111 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 x-cbid: 19041019-3107-0000-0000-00000AB2565A X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: BY=0.021108; FL=0; FP=0; FZ=0; HX=0; KW=0; PH=0; SC=0.4332; ST=0; TS=0; UL=0; ISC=; MB=0.154694 X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010904; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000284; SDB=6.01187189; UDB=6.00621838; IPR=6.00967952; BA=6.00006280; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00026380; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-04-10 19:20:01 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unsuspicious REMOTE=unsuspicious XFE=unused X-IBM-AV-VERSION: SAVI=2019-04-10 16:23:05 - 6.00009787 x-cbparentid: 19041019-3108-0000-0000-000065FCA1D5 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-10_08:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/12] introduce s390x architecture X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190410191529.F1a7DkmMCeSSyewQ7YScRRNJnQDrxc7ZXoWPq6cJX7c@z> Thanks for the links! I'll go through them. = =20 For Power CI, not sure how we can help as it is done by another team. If = s390x is added, we plan on maintaining currency and setting up CI on=20 s390x will help do that. = =20 = =20 Regards, Vivian Kong Linux on IBM Z Open Source Ecosystem IBM Canada Toronto Lab Thomas Monjalon wrote on 2019/04/10 01:43:34 PM: > From: Thomas Monjalon > To: Vivian Kong > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Date: 2019/04/10 01:43 PM > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/12] introduce s390x architecture > > 10/04/2019 19:09, Vivian Kong: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Thanks for your comments. Please see my answers to your questions below. > > > > > First question: What is the use case of DPDK on s390x? > > > > IBM would like to use DPDK in our new IBM cloud offering on Z. > > > > > > > > > Second question: How is it tested? Do you have any CI? > > > > We ran the tests by "make tests". We don't have CI set up at the moment > > but this is definitely something we are looking into adding. > > > > > > > > > Third question: Do you have time to dedicate to DPDK? > > > > After this initial port, we do plan to keep currency base on need but how > > frequent will be determined by usage. > > > > > > > > > If yes, why not helping with IBM Power? > > > > Our work is specific to Z offering, we'll be interested to run CI for Z > > also which will help maintaining our currency. > > > > How is CI set up on the platforms currently supported in DPDK? It looks > > like a build gets run after a patch is submitted. Wondering if there are > > any documentation on how this is set up? > > There is no complete documentation, but we should build one. > That would be great if you could help while riding this path. > > Some starting points: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url? > u=3Dhttps-3A=5F=5Fpatches.dpdk.org&d=3DDwICAg&c=3Djf=5FiaSHvJObTbx- > siA1ZOg&r=3Dt7gXFFEkLvveGPwCXa29Q41okXMOY7sJK43BPFcHaRY&m=3DVchTLEmGgUOXsp5= m5hZPa8aCYMnWpA3V=5FTmZGGW995I&s=3DY9d- > qW-nAewmuq-Op0l7kKOtq7hzIC3Wm-qcdkqQO8E&e=3D > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url? > u=3Dhttp-3A=5F=5Fgit.dpdk.org=5Ftools=5Fdpdk-2Dci=5F&d=3DDwICAg&c=3Djf=5F= iaSHvJObTbx- > siA1ZOg&r=3Dt7gXFFEkLvveGPwCXa29Q41okXMOY7sJK43BPFcHaRY&m=3DVchTLEmGgUOXsp5= m5hZPa8aCYMnWpA3V=5FTmZGGW995I&s=3DcP=5FhEZmUedWHOcXUF- > TTShw8UprsMFFrYhFyqp=5FmWHw&e=3D > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url? > u=3Dhttp-3A=5F=5Fmails.dpdk.org=5Flistinfo=5Fci&d=3DDwICAg&c=3Djf=5FiaSHv= JObTbx- > siA1ZOg&r=3Dt7gXFFEkLvveGPwCXa29Q41okXMOY7sJK43BPFcHaRY&m=3DVchTLEmGgUOXsp5= m5hZPa8aCYMnWpA3V=5FTmZGGW995I&s=3DWWm6B32WFdHyVc3CAuMwfNsIZEDpPeAhy9MJRKnK= Xow&e=3D > > Please help with IBM Power CI at the same time. > I would like to see some progress on this front > before integrating a new IBM CPU. > > >