* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
2019-04-11 13:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst Bernard Iremonger
@ 2019-04-11 13:08 ` Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-11 17:14 ` Trahe, Fiona
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bernard Iremonger @ 2019-04-11 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, konstantin.ananyev, akhil.goyal; +Cc: Bernard Iremonger, stable
Call rte_crypto_dequeue_burst() in a loop with
a delay to ensure that all the packets are dequeued
from the crtpto device.
Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
---
app/test/test_ipsec.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
index 80a2d25..25a7df4 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include <rte_mbuf.h>
#include <rte_malloc.h>
#include <rte_memcpy.h>
-#include <rte_pause.h>
+#include <rte_cycles.h>
#include <rte_bus_vdev.h>
#include <rte_ip.h>
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#define OUTBOUND_SPI 17
#define BURST_SIZE 32
#define REORDER_PKTS 1
+#define DEQUEUE_COUNT 1000
struct user_params {
enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type auth;
@@ -758,7 +759,9 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
uint32_t k, ng;
+ uint32_t pkt_cnt;
struct rte_ipsec_group grp[1];
+ int i;
/* call crypto prepare */
k = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare(&ut_params->ss[0], ut_params->ibuf,
@@ -774,9 +777,15 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
return TEST_FAILED;
}
- k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
- ut_params->cop, num_pkts);
- if (k != num_pkts) {
+ for (i = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
+ i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != num_pkts; i++) {
+ k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
+ &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], num_pkts - pkt_cnt);
+ pkt_cnt += k;
+ rte_delay_us(1);
+ }
+
+ if (pkt_cnt != num_pkts) {
RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
return TEST_FAILED;
}
@@ -868,7 +877,7 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
struct rte_ipsec_group grp[BURST_SIZE];
-
+ uint32_t pkt_cnt;
uint32_t k, ng, i, r;
for (i = 0; i < BURST_SIZE; i++) {
@@ -890,9 +899,14 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
}
}
- k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
- ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
- if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
+ for (i = 0, k = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
+ i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE; i++) {
+ k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
+ &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], BURST_SIZE - pkt_cnt);
+ pkt_cnt += k;
+ rte_delay_us(1);
+ }
+ if (pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE) {
RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
return TEST_FAILED;
}
@@ -1007,6 +1021,7 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa_4grp(void)
struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
struct rte_ipsec_group grp[BURST_SIZE];
uint32_t k, ng, i, j;
+ uint32_t pkt_cnt;
uint32_t rc = 0;
for (i = 0; i < BURST_SIZE; i++) {
@@ -1029,9 +1044,14 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa_4grp(void)
}
}
- k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
- ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
- if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
+ for (i = 0, k = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
+ i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE; i++) {
+ k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
+ &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], BURST_SIZE - pkt_cnt);
+ pkt_cnt += k;
+ rte_delay_us(1);
+ }
+ if (pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE) {
RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
return TEST_FAILED;
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
2019-04-11 13:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-11 13:08 ` Bernard Iremonger
@ 2019-04-11 17:14 ` Trahe, Fiona
2019-04-11 17:14 ` Trahe, Fiona
2019-04-12 10:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-12 14:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bernard Iremonger
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Trahe, Fiona @ 2019-04-11 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Iremonger, Bernard, dev, Ananyev, Konstantin, akhil.goyal
Cc: Iremonger, Bernard, stable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Iremonger
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 2:08 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; akhil.goyal@nxp.com
> Cc: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
>
> Call rte_crypto_dequeue_burst() in a loop with
> a delay to ensure that all the packets are dequeued
> from the crtpto device.
>
> Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
2019-04-11 17:14 ` Trahe, Fiona
@ 2019-04-11 17:14 ` Trahe, Fiona
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Trahe, Fiona @ 2019-04-11 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Iremonger, Bernard, dev, Ananyev, Konstantin, akhil.goyal
Cc: Iremonger, Bernard, stable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Iremonger
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 2:08 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; akhil.goyal@nxp.com
> Cc: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
>
> Call rte_crypto_dequeue_burst() in a loop with
> a delay to ensure that all the packets are dequeued
> from the crtpto device.
>
> Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
2019-04-11 13:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-11 13:08 ` Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-11 17:14 ` Trahe, Fiona
@ 2019-04-12 10:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-12 10:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-12 11:24 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-12 14:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bernard Iremonger
3 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2019-04-12 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Iremonger, Bernard, dev, akhil.goyal; +Cc: stable
Hi Bernard,
/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
>
> Call rte_crypto_dequeue_burst() in a loop with
> a delay to ensure that all the packets are dequeued
> from the crtpto device.
>
> Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_ipsec.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> index 80a2d25..25a7df4 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> #include <rte_mbuf.h>
> #include <rte_malloc.h>
> #include <rte_memcpy.h>
> -#include <rte_pause.h>
> +#include <rte_cycles.h>
> #include <rte_bus_vdev.h>
> #include <rte_ip.h>
>
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #define OUTBOUND_SPI 17
> #define BURST_SIZE 32
> #define REORDER_PKTS 1
> +#define DEQUEUE_COUNT 1000
>
> struct user_params {
> enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type auth;
> @@ -758,7 +759,9 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
> struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> uint32_t k, ng;
> + uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> struct rte_ipsec_group grp[1];
> + int i;
>
> /* call crypto prepare */
> k = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare(&ut_params->ss[0], ut_params->ibuf,
> @@ -774,9 +777,15 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
>
> - k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> - ut_params->cop, num_pkts);
> - if (k != num_pkts) {
> + for (i = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
> + i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != num_pkts; i++) {
> + k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> + &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], num_pkts - pkt_cnt);
> + pkt_cnt += k;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> + }
Looks good to me.
My only suggestion would be to put that loop in a separate function
to avoid duplications.
Apart from that:
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> +
> + if (pkt_cnt != num_pkts) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
> @@ -868,7 +877,7 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
> struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> struct rte_ipsec_group grp[BURST_SIZE];
> -
> + uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> uint32_t k, ng, i, r;
>
> for (i = 0; i < BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> @@ -890,9 +899,14 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
> }
> }
>
> - k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> - ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
> - if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
> + for (i = 0, k = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
> + i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> + k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> + &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], BURST_SIZE - pkt_cnt);
> + pkt_cnt += k;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> + }
> + if (pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
> @@ -1007,6 +1021,7 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa_4grp(void)
> struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> struct rte_ipsec_group grp[BURST_SIZE];
> uint32_t k, ng, i, j;
> + uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> uint32_t rc = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> @@ -1029,9 +1044,14 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa_4grp(void)
> }
> }
>
> - k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> - ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
> - if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
> + for (i = 0, k = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
> + i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> + k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> + &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], BURST_SIZE - pkt_cnt);
> + pkt_cnt += k;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> + }
> + if (pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
2019-04-12 10:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2019-04-12 10:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-12 11:24 ` Iremonger, Bernard
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2019-04-12 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Iremonger, Bernard, dev, akhil.goyal; +Cc: stable
Hi Bernard,
/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
>
> Call rte_crypto_dequeue_burst() in a loop with
> a delay to ensure that all the packets are dequeued
> from the crtpto device.
>
> Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_ipsec.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> index 80a2d25..25a7df4 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> #include <rte_mbuf.h>
> #include <rte_malloc.h>
> #include <rte_memcpy.h>
> -#include <rte_pause.h>
> +#include <rte_cycles.h>
> #include <rte_bus_vdev.h>
> #include <rte_ip.h>
>
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #define OUTBOUND_SPI 17
> #define BURST_SIZE 32
> #define REORDER_PKTS 1
> +#define DEQUEUE_COUNT 1000
>
> struct user_params {
> enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type auth;
> @@ -758,7 +759,9 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
> struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> uint32_t k, ng;
> + uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> struct rte_ipsec_group grp[1];
> + int i;
>
> /* call crypto prepare */
> k = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare(&ut_params->ss[0], ut_params->ibuf,
> @@ -774,9 +777,15 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
>
> - k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> - ut_params->cop, num_pkts);
> - if (k != num_pkts) {
> + for (i = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
> + i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != num_pkts; i++) {
> + k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> + &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], num_pkts - pkt_cnt);
> + pkt_cnt += k;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> + }
Looks good to me.
My only suggestion would be to put that loop in a separate function
to avoid duplications.
Apart from that:
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> +
> + if (pkt_cnt != num_pkts) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
> @@ -868,7 +877,7 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
> struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> struct rte_ipsec_group grp[BURST_SIZE];
> -
> + uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> uint32_t k, ng, i, r;
>
> for (i = 0; i < BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> @@ -890,9 +899,14 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
> }
> }
>
> - k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> - ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
> - if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
> + for (i = 0, k = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
> + i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> + k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> + &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], BURST_SIZE - pkt_cnt);
> + pkt_cnt += k;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> + }
> + if (pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
> @@ -1007,6 +1021,7 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa_4grp(void)
> struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> struct rte_ipsec_group grp[BURST_SIZE];
> uint32_t k, ng, i, j;
> + uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> uint32_t rc = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> @@ -1029,9 +1044,14 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa_4grp(void)
> }
> }
>
> - k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> - ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
> - if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
> + for (i = 0, k = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
> + i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> + k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> + &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], BURST_SIZE - pkt_cnt);
> + pkt_cnt += k;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> + }
> + if (pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
2019-04-12 10:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-12 10:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2019-04-12 11:24 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-12 11:24 ` Iremonger, Bernard
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Iremonger, Bernard @ 2019-04-12 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ananyev, Konstantin, dev, akhil.goyal; +Cc: stable
Hi Konstantin,
<snip>
> > Call rte_crypto_dequeue_burst() in a loop with a delay to ensure that
> > all the packets are dequeued from the crtpto device.
> >
> > Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > ---
> > app/test/test_ipsec.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c index
> > 80a2d25..25a7df4 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> > #include <rte_mbuf.h>
> > #include <rte_malloc.h>
> > #include <rte_memcpy.h>
> > -#include <rte_pause.h>
> > +#include <rte_cycles.h>
> > #include <rte_bus_vdev.h>
> > #include <rte_ip.h>
> >
> > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> > #define OUTBOUND_SPI 17
> > #define BURST_SIZE 32
> > #define REORDER_PKTS 1
> > +#define DEQUEUE_COUNT 1000
> >
> > struct user_params {
> > enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type auth; @@ -758,7 +759,9 @@
> > crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
> > struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> > struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> > uint32_t k, ng;
> > + uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> > struct rte_ipsec_group grp[1];
> > + int i;
> >
> > /* call crypto prepare */
> > k = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare(&ut_params->ss[0], ut_params->ibuf,
> > @@ -774,9 +777,15 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
> > return TEST_FAILED;
> > }
> >
> > - k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> > - ut_params->cop, num_pkts);
> > - if (k != num_pkts) {
> > + for (i = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
> > + i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != num_pkts; i++) {
> > + k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> > + &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], num_pkts -
> pkt_cnt);
> > + pkt_cnt += k;
> > + rte_delay_us(1);
> > + }
>
> Looks good to me.
> My only suggestion would be to put that loop in a separate function to avoid
> duplications.
> Apart from that:
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
I will put that loop in a separate function and send v2
Regards,
Bernard.
snip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
2019-04-12 11:24 ` Iremonger, Bernard
@ 2019-04-12 11:24 ` Iremonger, Bernard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Iremonger, Bernard @ 2019-04-12 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ananyev, Konstantin, dev, akhil.goyal; +Cc: stable
Hi Konstantin,
<snip>
> > Call rte_crypto_dequeue_burst() in a loop with a delay to ensure that
> > all the packets are dequeued from the crtpto device.
> >
> > Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > ---
> > app/test/test_ipsec.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c index
> > 80a2d25..25a7df4 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> > #include <rte_mbuf.h>
> > #include <rte_malloc.h>
> > #include <rte_memcpy.h>
> > -#include <rte_pause.h>
> > +#include <rte_cycles.h>
> > #include <rte_bus_vdev.h>
> > #include <rte_ip.h>
> >
> > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> > #define OUTBOUND_SPI 17
> > #define BURST_SIZE 32
> > #define REORDER_PKTS 1
> > +#define DEQUEUE_COUNT 1000
> >
> > struct user_params {
> > enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type auth; @@ -758,7 +759,9 @@
> > crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
> > struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> > struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> > uint32_t k, ng;
> > + uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> > struct rte_ipsec_group grp[1];
> > + int i;
> >
> > /* call crypto prepare */
> > k = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare(&ut_params->ss[0], ut_params->ibuf,
> > @@ -774,9 +777,15 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
> > return TEST_FAILED;
> > }
> >
> > - k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> > - ut_params->cop, num_pkts);
> > - if (k != num_pkts) {
> > + for (i = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
> > + i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != num_pkts; i++) {
> > + k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> > + &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], num_pkts -
> pkt_cnt);
> > + pkt_cnt += k;
> > + rte_delay_us(1);
> > + }
>
> Looks good to me.
> My only suggestion would be to put that loop in a separate function to avoid
> duplications.
> Apart from that:
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
I will put that loop in a separate function and send v2
Regards,
Bernard.
snip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
2019-04-11 13:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst Bernard Iremonger
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-04-12 10:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2019-04-12 14:08 ` Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-12 14:08 ` Bernard Iremonger
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bernard Iremonger @ 2019-04-12 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, konstantin.ananyev, akhil.goyal; +Cc: Bernard Iremonger, stable
Added crypto_dequeue_burst() function to call
rte_crypto_dequeue_burst() in a loop with a
delay to ensure that all the packets are
dequeued from the crtpto device.
Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
Changes in v2:
Added crypto_dequeue_burst() function
app/test/test_ipsec.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
index 80a2d25..d79fe11 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include <rte_mbuf.h>
#include <rte_malloc.h>
#include <rte_memcpy.h>
-#include <rte_pause.h>
+#include <rte_cycles.h>
#include <rte_bus_vdev.h>
#include <rte_ip.h>
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#define OUTBOUND_SPI 17
#define BURST_SIZE 32
#define REORDER_PKTS 1
+#define DEQUEUE_COUNT 1000
struct user_params {
enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type auth;
@@ -753,6 +754,29 @@ create_sa(enum rte_security_session_action_type action_type,
}
static int
+crypto_dequeue_burst(uint16_t num_pkts)
+{
+ struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
+ struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
+ uint32_t pkt_cnt, k;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
+ i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != num_pkts; i++) {
+ k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
+ &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], num_pkts - pkt_cnt);
+ pkt_cnt += k;
+ rte_delay_us(1);
+ }
+
+ if (pkt_cnt != num_pkts) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
{
struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
@@ -767,6 +791,7 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare fail\n");
return TEST_FAILED;
}
+
k = rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
ut_params->cop, num_pkts);
if (k != num_pkts) {
@@ -774,12 +799,8 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
return TEST_FAILED;
}
- k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
- ut_params->cop, num_pkts);
- if (k != num_pkts) {
- RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
+ if (crypto_dequeue_burst(num_pkts) == TEST_FAILED)
return TEST_FAILED;
- }
ng = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_group(
(const struct rte_crypto_op **)(uintptr_t)ut_params->cop,
@@ -868,7 +889,6 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
struct rte_ipsec_group grp[BURST_SIZE];
-
uint32_t k, ng, i, r;
for (i = 0; i < BURST_SIZE; i++) {
@@ -890,12 +910,8 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
}
}
- k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
- ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
- if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
- RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
+ if (crypto_dequeue_burst(BURST_SIZE) == TEST_FAILED)
return TEST_FAILED;
- }
ng = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_group(
(const struct rte_crypto_op **)(uintptr_t)ut_params->cop,
@@ -1029,12 +1045,8 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa_4grp(void)
}
}
- k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
- ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
- if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
- RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
+ if (crypto_dequeue_burst(BURST_SIZE) == TEST_FAILED)
return TEST_FAILED;
- }
ng = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_group(
(const struct rte_crypto_op **)(uintptr_t)ut_params->cop,
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
2019-04-12 14:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bernard Iremonger
@ 2019-04-12 14:08 ` Bernard Iremonger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bernard Iremonger @ 2019-04-12 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, konstantin.ananyev, akhil.goyal; +Cc: Bernard Iremonger, stable
Added crypto_dequeue_burst() function to call
rte_crypto_dequeue_burst() in a loop with a
delay to ensure that all the packets are
dequeued from the crtpto device.
Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
Changes in v2:
Added crypto_dequeue_burst() function
app/test/test_ipsec.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
index 80a2d25..d79fe11 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include <rte_mbuf.h>
#include <rte_malloc.h>
#include <rte_memcpy.h>
-#include <rte_pause.h>
+#include <rte_cycles.h>
#include <rte_bus_vdev.h>
#include <rte_ip.h>
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#define OUTBOUND_SPI 17
#define BURST_SIZE 32
#define REORDER_PKTS 1
+#define DEQUEUE_COUNT 1000
struct user_params {
enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type auth;
@@ -753,6 +754,29 @@ create_sa(enum rte_security_session_action_type action_type,
}
static int
+crypto_dequeue_burst(uint16_t num_pkts)
+{
+ struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
+ struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
+ uint32_t pkt_cnt, k;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
+ i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != num_pkts; i++) {
+ k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
+ &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], num_pkts - pkt_cnt);
+ pkt_cnt += k;
+ rte_delay_us(1);
+ }
+
+ if (pkt_cnt != num_pkts) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
{
struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
@@ -767,6 +791,7 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare fail\n");
return TEST_FAILED;
}
+
k = rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
ut_params->cop, num_pkts);
if (k != num_pkts) {
@@ -774,12 +799,8 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
return TEST_FAILED;
}
- k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
- ut_params->cop, num_pkts);
- if (k != num_pkts) {
- RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
+ if (crypto_dequeue_burst(num_pkts) == TEST_FAILED)
return TEST_FAILED;
- }
ng = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_group(
(const struct rte_crypto_op **)(uintptr_t)ut_params->cop,
@@ -868,7 +889,6 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
struct rte_ipsec_group grp[BURST_SIZE];
-
uint32_t k, ng, i, r;
for (i = 0; i < BURST_SIZE; i++) {
@@ -890,12 +910,8 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
}
}
- k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
- ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
- if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
- RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
+ if (crypto_dequeue_burst(BURST_SIZE) == TEST_FAILED)
return TEST_FAILED;
- }
ng = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_group(
(const struct rte_crypto_op **)(uintptr_t)ut_params->cop,
@@ -1029,12 +1045,8 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa_4grp(void)
}
}
- k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
- ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
- if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
- RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
+ if (crypto_dequeue_burst(BURST_SIZE) == TEST_FAILED)
return TEST_FAILED;
- }
ng = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_group(
(const struct rte_crypto_op **)(uintptr_t)ut_params->cop,
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread