From: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: p.oltarzewski@gmail.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/bonding: fix LACP fast queue Rx handler
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:01:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a4fa115-0f92-9686-ae89-0f1427ab6d29@gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190412140157.Y08MABu0X5I7oopsC1pAgs5p-NWMKlBmtf7564_wDb0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554900829-16180-3-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com>
I should have some time this weekend to run these patches through our
regression system.
On 4/10/19 8:53 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> fast queue Rx burst function is missing checks on promisc and the
> slave collecting state.
> Define an inline wrapper to have a common base.
>
> Fixes: 112891cd27e5 ("net/bonding: add dedicated HW queues for LACP control")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c | 73 +++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> index c193d6d..989be5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> @@ -256,48 +256,9 @@
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static uint16_t
> -bond_ethdev_rx_burst_8023ad_fast_queue(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs,
> - uint16_t nb_pkts)
> -{
> - struct bond_rx_queue *bd_rx_q = (struct bond_rx_queue *)queue;
> - struct bond_dev_private *internals = bd_rx_q->dev_private;
> - uint16_t num_rx_total = 0; /* Total number of received packets */
> - uint16_t slaves[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
> - uint16_t slave_count;
> - uint16_t active_slave;
> - uint16_t i;
> -
> - /* Copy slave list to protect against slave up/down changes during tx
> - * bursting */
> - slave_count = internals->active_slave_count;
> - active_slave = internals->active_slave;
> - memcpy(slaves, internals->active_slaves,
> - sizeof(internals->active_slaves[0]) * slave_count);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < slave_count && nb_pkts; i++) {
> - uint16_t num_rx_slave;
> -
> - /* Read packets from this slave */
> - num_rx_slave = rte_eth_rx_burst(slaves[active_slave],
> - bd_rx_q->queue_id,
> - bufs + num_rx_total, nb_pkts);
> - num_rx_total += num_rx_slave;
> - nb_pkts -= num_rx_slave;
> -
> - if (++active_slave == slave_count)
> - active_slave = 0;
> - }
> -
> - if (++internals->active_slave >= slave_count)
> - internals->active_slave = 0;
> -
> - return num_rx_total;
> -}
> -
> -static uint16_t
> -bond_ethdev_rx_burst_8023ad(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs,
> - uint16_t nb_pkts)
> +static inline uint16_t
> +rx_burst_8023ad(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts,
> + bool dedicated_rxq)
> {
> /* Cast to structure, containing bonded device's port id and queue id */
> struct bond_rx_queue *bd_rx_q = (struct bond_rx_queue *)queue;
> @@ -357,10 +318,16 @@
> hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(bufs[j], struct ether_hdr *);
> subtype = ((struct slow_protocol_frame *)hdr)->slow_protocol.subtype;
>
> - /* Remove packet from array if it is slow packet or slave is not
> - * in collecting state or bonding interface is not in promiscuous
> - * mode and packet address does not match. */
> - if (unlikely(is_lacp_packets(hdr->ether_type, subtype, bufs[j]) ||
> + /* Remove packet from array if:
> + * - it is slow packet but no dedicated rxq is present,
> + * - slave is not in collecting state,
> + * - bonding interface is not in promiscuous mode and
> + * packet is not multicast and address does not match,
> + */
> + if (unlikely(
The coding style checker doesn't like this:
CHECK:OPEN_ENDED_LINE: Lines should not end with a '('
> + (!dedicated_rxq &&
> + is_lacp_packets(hdr->ether_type, subtype,
> + bufs[j])) ||
> !collecting ||
> (!promisc &&
> !is_multicast_ether_addr(&hdr->d_addr) &&
> @@ -392,6 +359,20 @@
> return num_rx_total;
> }
>
> +static uint16_t
> +bond_ethdev_rx_burst_8023ad(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs,
> + uint16_t nb_pkts)
> +{
> + return rx_burst_8023ad(queue, bufs, nb_pkts, false);
> +}
> +
> +static uint16_t
> +bond_ethdev_rx_burst_8023ad_fast_queue(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs,
> + uint16_t nb_pkts)
> +{
> + return rx_burst_8023ad(queue, bufs, nb_pkts, true);
> +}
> +
> #if defined(RTE_LIBRTE_BOND_DEBUG_ALB) || defined(RTE_LIBRTE_BOND_DEBUG_ALB_L1)
> uint32_t burstnumberRX;
> uint32_t burstnumberTX;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-12 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 12:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] lacp rx/tx handlers fixes for bonding pmd David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/bonding: fix oob access in LACP mode when sending many packets David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/bonding: fix LACP fast queue Rx handler David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` David Marchand
2019-04-12 14:01 ` Chas Williams [this message]
2019-04-12 14:01 ` Chas Williams
2019-04-18 7:11 ` David Marchand
2019-04-18 7:11 ` David Marchand
2019-04-18 22:50 ` Chas Williams
2019-04-18 22:50 ` Chas Williams
2019-05-16 9:12 ` David Marchand
2019-05-16 9:12 ` David Marchand
2019-07-02 15:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-08-14 1:43 ` Chas Williams
2019-08-19 9:41 ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/bonding: fix unicast packets filtering when not in promisc David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/bonding: prefer allmulti to promisc for LACP David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` David Marchand
2019-06-27 8:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] lacp rx/tx handlers fixes for bonding pmd Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-27 12:07 ` WILLIAMS, CHARLES J
2019-06-27 12:19 ` Chas Williams
2019-08-22 16:48 ` Yigit, Ferruh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a4fa115-0f92-9686-ae89-0f1427ab6d29@gmail.com \
--to=3chas3@gmail.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=p.oltarzewski@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).