From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
dev@dpdk.org, Chas Williams <chas3@att.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/af_packet: fix vlan_insert corruption
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:42:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190416094212.GA1865@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190416094213.mTmAhUkdcAUwlf6biHDREdZpLtUiSs4d3xDzDrYIHPY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3dff5ba9-3965-be8d-7bd5-d8504a66c130@intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:37:07AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/12/2019 11:08 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 17:28:17 +0100
> > Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/8/2019 5:41 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>> If the af_packet transmit is sending a VLAN packet,
> >>> and the transmit path to the kernel os full, then it would
> >>> mismanage the outgoing mbuf. The original mbuf would end up
> >>> being freed twice, once by AF_PACKET PMD and once by caller.
> >>
> >> This comment is valid with your new patch [1] that updates 'rte_vlan_insert()'
> >> to duplicate the mbuf, right?
> >>
> >> That patch looks like won't make the release, so I suggest this one wait that
> >> patch, although this is harmless on its own, commit log is misleading.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/51870/
> >
> > It was always true, even with existing vlan_insert.
> > Existing vlan_insert has issues if it ever creates a clone packet.
> > Existing vlan_insert can duplicate mbuf through clone
> >
>
> Right, existing vlan_insert has same issue on af_packet.
>
> But, should vlan_insert try to duplicate the mbuf when it is shared, does it
> worth the complexity it brings? And when that support removed this patch won't
> be needed.
I don't think vlan insert or other mbuf manipulation APIs should be
checking for shared state or not - that's the job of the app. We could have
cases where the user does want to modify a shared mbuf.
Regards,
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-16 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 16:04 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 16:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 16:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 16:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-12 22:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-12 22:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-16 9:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-16 9:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-16 9:42 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2019-04-16 9:42 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-16 15:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-16 15:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-16 15:13 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-16 15:13 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-07-04 18:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190416094212.GA1865@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=chas3@att.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).