From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BC1A00E6
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:18:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6D51BC9B;
	Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:18:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E1A1BC99
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:18:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DBB25D44;
 Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:18:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:18:33 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp;
 bh=Nudi72VIPqB7TD3yKwRtBsWvRFeFvaBteDSfZu1PKc4=; b=MoTJ7nmJuBJD
 Q3kYW5DePptwXTRYU5tSopO+UkX2SOL2Hgev28p/3bztp9knt4o0lKyZ0r7xR5LB
 kvrvptceUSC/j3NPr2F+ah36/qhzijJYIVI+2bxtpIFOHlIVUGeLPjGcghS/2lQH
 c7dYQM9oTOe0pcUxz0cwdCHTEH5I0Vg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Nudi72VIPqB7TD3yKwRtBsWvRFeFvaBteDSfZu1PK
 c4=; b=1JhBUbZjCDZzODGjzajMVwX4JevXLDAHsl1RKvosb1X9aWtlN8fwSAg3o
 hcVii/4LkGrEANqMsOhVKpPnLbU8g5jvCuPgwKxd4YRczHUU6P2+RftGNdBtBKTw
 Roh7bbLl5+Yb8/3HQ06TTffQ+f6kRSf7TrW657wrHxZktnDQVB3AWMeTZQli3hNQ
 QauH9S8RbtC3UZo2QgvHe89PindDZJAuml7mc/Rp8Bu1cUmQ1iUwCZrgU8LaTUj5
 koqZVEpMSwYNExUPtpA89UJv7GfVjzrIYxhxYg1yWK8i0CumIG1ENiuSwR4R5gMN
 w3pSPji5NZx5FxKMur+cPcW5Qradw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:qem4XGiywD-EBOpDCCMFvx3pv9JK8cR1Hn5yA-T5ZqWbAvIUkB3plA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrfeehgdelfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
 curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
 uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc
 fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs
 ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh
 hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfr
 rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenuc
 evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:qem4XN2BcVEfC9Mm21jiHfNn8irS3gEO-inwHOeCySbRAFP7Hmbffw>
 <xmx:qem4XCVMKLs1MW7iTaPKmD1O3yhjfH-6Kmzls1HV8UctpkgeFUEacA>
 <xmx:qem4XIAtmjMdviZYWZqzlZ43Vulh70VcQg7cuReuibZdhjQ__2k9lg>
 <xmx:qem4XKwM4GG7XtKYWtQCWlFp556CPCs7tvCozGWkfUuafsbMNqm5vg>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 64162103D1;
 Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:18:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Pradeep Satyanarayana <pradeep@us.ibm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
 Vivian Kong <vivkong@ca.ibm.com>, David Wilder <wilder@us.ibm.com>,
 Cindy Lee <cinderel@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:18:30 +0200
Message-ID: <777837970.rIl5XSfYO4@xps>
In-Reply-To: <OFE27F08F1.DCE5ED4B-ON882583E0.00739723-882583E0.0073F9E8@notes.na.collabserv.com>
References: <20190409190630.31975-1-vivkong@ca.ibm.com>
 <OFB9049735.7E51096E-ON882583D9.00574783-882583D9.00579FE2@LocalDomain>
 <OFE27F08F1.DCE5ED4B-ON882583E0.00739723-882583E0.0073F9E8@notes.na.collabserv.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/12] introduce s390x architecture
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20190418211830.Z-2NdrHODGlWCUjzjT4J7UCc9bBPyR6hpwtY_ClkIhE@z>

18/04/2019 23:06, Pradeep Satyanarayana:
> 
> Pradeep Satyanarayana/Beaverton/IBM wrote on 04/11/2019 08:57:05 AM:
> 
> > From: Pradeep Satyanarayana/Beaverton/IBM
> > To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Vivian
> > Kong <vivkong@ca.ibm.com>, David Wilder <wilder@us.ibm.com>
> > Date: 04/11/2019 08:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/12] introduce s390x architecture
> >
> >
> > > > > We are still seeing some compilation issues regularly on Power.
> > > > > Before going to DTS, I think you should extend your compilation
> testing,
> > > > > and basic feature testing with builtin unit tests.
> > > >
> > > > We have not observed any compilation issues since we started the CI.
> The
> > > > last issue reported
> > > > was during 18.11-rc1 that Mellanox fixed. Hopefully, we should catch
> any
> > > > such regressions
> > > > quickly in the future, since we now have a CI that runs periodically.
> > >
> > > There are some failure when compiling with big endian toolchain.
> > > It seems you are not testing big endian.
> >
> > Correct, we have been doing all our work on little endian only.
> >
> > > If you don't support big endian, please mention it in the doc.
> >
> > Thank you for alerting us about this. Good point that you bring up.
> > I will need some time to consult and figure out how we approach this.
> > Let me get back to you on this.
> 
> On the Linux on Power front going forward, there are currently no plans to
> support BE,
> just LE.
> 
> The doc you mention above, is that this one?
> 
> https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/platform/index.html

Yes, thank you.