DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Przemysław Ołtarzewski" <p.oltarzewski@gmail.com>,
	"dpdk stable" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/bonding: fix LACP fast queue Rx handler
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:50:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f8dc043-cd47-d677-872a-54fbd4477f64@gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190418225022.sN9A9MbibLgMMXcsxPCepDT6Ce1IkZxcovlvYHbZyDs@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8wj1=OKwU9RzFdrF0yDCcvjKR6HMdMfCFxJw85zQt5O5w@mail.gmail.com>



On 4/18/19 3:11 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Chas,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:02 PM Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com 
> <mailto:3chas3@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I should have some time this weekend to run these patches through our
>     regression system.
> 
> 
> Did you manage to run this series through your tests system ?

There were some other issues over the weekend. Hopefully this one.

> 
> 
>     On 4/10/19 8:53 AM, David Marchand wrote:
>      > @@ -357,10 +318,16 @@
>      >                       hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(bufs[j], struct
>     ether_hdr *);
>      >                       subtype = ((struct slow_protocol_frame
>     *)hdr)->slow_protocol.subtype;
>      >
>      > -                     /* Remove packet from array if it is slow
>     packet or slave is not
>      > -                      * in collecting state or bonding interface
>     is not in promiscuous
>      > -                      * mode and packet address does not match. */
>      > -                     if
>     (unlikely(is_lacp_packets(hdr->ether_type, subtype, bufs[j]) ||
>      > +                     /* Remove packet from array if:
>      > +                      * - it is slow packet but no dedicated rxq
>     is present,
>      > +                      * - slave is not in collecting state,
>      > +                      * - bonding interface is not in
>     promiscuous mode and
>      > +                      *   packet is not multicast and address
>     does not match,
>      > +                      */
>      > +                     if (unlikely(
> 
>     The coding style checker doesn't like this:
> 
>     CHECK:OPEN_ENDED_LINE: Lines should not end with a '('
> 
> 
> Yes, I had seen this warning, just found it easier to read this way.
> 
> 
> 
>      > +                             (!dedicated_rxq &&
>      > +                              is_lacp_packets(hdr->ether_type,
>     subtype,
>      > +                                              bufs[j])) ||
>      >                               !collecting ||
>      >                               (!promisc &&
>      >                               
>     !is_multicast_ether_addr(&hdr->d_addr) &&
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Marchand

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-18 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-10 12:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] lacp rx/tx handlers fixes for bonding pmd David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/bonding: fix oob access in LACP mode when sending many packets David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53   ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/bonding: fix LACP fast queue Rx handler David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53   ` David Marchand
2019-04-12 14:01   ` Chas Williams
2019-04-12 14:01     ` Chas Williams
2019-04-18  7:11     ` David Marchand
2019-04-18  7:11       ` David Marchand
2019-04-18 22:50       ` Chas Williams [this message]
2019-04-18 22:50         ` Chas Williams
2019-05-16  9:12         ` David Marchand
2019-05-16  9:12           ` David Marchand
2019-07-02 15:01           ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-08-14  1:43             ` Chas Williams
2019-08-19  9:41               ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/bonding: fix unicast packets filtering when not in promisc David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53   ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/bonding: prefer allmulti to promisc for LACP David Marchand
2019-04-10 12:53   ` David Marchand
2019-06-27  8:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] lacp rx/tx handlers fixes for bonding pmd Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-27 12:07   ` WILLIAMS, CHARLES J
2019-06-27 12:19   ` Chas Williams
2019-08-22 16:48 ` Yigit, Ferruh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0f8dc043-cd47-d677-872a-54fbd4477f64@gmail.com \
    --to=3chas3@gmail.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=p.oltarzewski@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).