From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>, <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/sfc: fix MTU change to check Rx scatter consistency
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:14:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1556007270-1511-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190423081430.0l4VQXA9ev_FH4JkZn9K9DG_28iD8Rl5z4F2sC3SdjU@z> (raw)
From: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Rx queue setup function checks configured MTU to make sure that
no oversized packets can be received. But a following call to
set MTU function might make this check irrelevant.
Add a function to check MTU size against Rx buffer size and
additional Rx queue info, including Rx scatter offload.
Fixes: e961cf425e02 ("net/sfc: support MTU change")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
index ff192314d..a007d4564 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
@@ -865,6 +865,34 @@ sfc_flow_ctrl_set(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_fc_conf *fc_conf)
return -rc;
}
+static int
+sfc_check_scatter_on_all_rx_queues(struct sfc_adapter *sa, size_t pdu)
+{
+ struct sfc_adapter_shared * const sas = sfc_sa2shared(sa);
+ const efx_nic_cfg_t *encp = efx_nic_cfg_get(sa->nic);
+ boolean_t scatter_enabled;
+ const char *error;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < sas->rxq_count; i++) {
+ if ((sas->rxq_info[i].state & SFC_RXQ_INITIALIZED) == 0)
+ continue;
+
+ scatter_enabled = (sas->rxq_info[i].type_flags &
+ EFX_RXQ_FLAG_SCATTER);
+
+ if (!sfc_rx_check_scatter(pdu, sa->rxq_ctrl[i].buf_size,
+ encp->enc_rx_prefix_size,
+ scatter_enabled, &error)) {
+ sfc_err(sa, "MTU check for RxQ %u failed: %s", i,
+ error);
+ return EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
sfc_dev_set_mtu(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu)
{
@@ -891,6 +919,10 @@ sfc_dev_set_mtu(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu)
sfc_adapter_lock(sa);
+ rc = sfc_check_scatter_on_all_rx_queues(sa, pdu);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ goto fail_check_scatter;
+
if (pdu != sa->port.pdu) {
if (sa->state == SFC_ADAPTER_STARTED) {
sfc_stop(sa);
@@ -927,6 +959,8 @@ sfc_dev_set_mtu(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu)
sfc_err(sa, "cannot start with neither new (%u) nor old (%u) "
"PDU max size - port is stopped",
(unsigned int)pdu, (unsigned int)old_pdu);
+
+fail_check_scatter:
sfc_adapter_unlock(sa);
fail_inval:
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
index 5d8c2765c..f2221119c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
@@ -360,6 +360,18 @@ sfc_efx_rx_qdesc_status(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq, uint16_t offset)
return RTE_ETH_RX_DESC_UNAVAIL;
}
+boolean_t
+sfc_rx_check_scatter(size_t pdu, size_t rx_buf_size, uint32_t rx_prefix_size,
+ boolean_t rx_scatter_enabled, const char **error)
+{
+ if ((rx_buf_size < pdu + rx_prefix_size) && !rx_scatter_enabled) {
+ *error = "Rx scatter is disabled and RxQ mbuf pool object size is too small";
+ return B_FALSE;
+ }
+
+ return B_TRUE;
+}
+
/** Get Rx datapath ops by the datapath RxQ handle */
const struct sfc_dp_rx *
sfc_dp_rx_by_dp_rxq(const struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq)
@@ -975,6 +987,7 @@ sfc_rx_qinit(struct sfc_adapter *sa, unsigned int sw_index,
struct sfc_dp_rx_qcreate_info info;
struct sfc_dp_rx_hw_limits hw_limits;
uint16_t rx_free_thresh;
+ const char *error;
memset(&hw_limits, 0, sizeof(hw_limits));
hw_limits.rxq_max_entries = sa->rxq_max_entries;
@@ -1005,10 +1018,11 @@ sfc_rx_qinit(struct sfc_adapter *sa, unsigned int sw_index,
goto fail_bad_conf;
}
- if ((buf_size < sa->port.pdu + encp->enc_rx_prefix_size) &&
- (~offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER)) {
- sfc_err(sa, "Rx scatter is disabled and RxQ %u mbuf pool "
- "object size is too small", sw_index);
+ if (!sfc_rx_check_scatter(sa->port.pdu, buf_size,
+ encp->enc_rx_prefix_size,
+ (offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER),
+ &error)) {
+ sfc_err(sa, "RxQ %u MTU check failed: %s", sw_index, error);
sfc_err(sa, "RxQ %u calculated Rx buffer size is %u vs "
"PDU size %u plus Rx prefix %u bytes",
sw_index, buf_size, (unsigned int)sa->port.pdu,
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.h b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.h
index ee1402022..aca0925b5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.h
@@ -142,6 +142,10 @@ void sfc_rx_hash_fini(struct sfc_adapter *sa);
int sfc_rx_hf_rte_to_efx(struct sfc_adapter *sa, uint64_t rte,
efx_rx_hash_type_t *efx);
uint64_t sfc_rx_hf_efx_to_rte(struct sfc_rss *rss, efx_rx_hash_type_t efx);
+boolean_t sfc_rx_check_scatter(size_t pdu, size_t rx_buf_size,
+ uint32_t rx_prefix_size,
+ boolean_t rx_scatter_enabled,
+ const char **error);
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-23 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-23 8:14 Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2019-04-23 8:14 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-23 11:35 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-23 11:35 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-08 16:06 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-05-08 16:06 ` Kevin Traynor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1556007270-1511-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).