DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
	"Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix 1st packet dropped for inline crypto
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:21:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580148A9B0D4@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190423132137.AOWcYOJBe13aZ_60iu6QU885NFJC2zwnPfd8Z7IMg6U@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB4893E33133A6B97BA2CE2067E6230@VI1PR04MB4893.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Akhil,

> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Akhil Goyal
> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 7:21 PM
> > To: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> > konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix 1st packet dropped for
> > inline crypto
> >
> > Hi Bernard,
> >
> > > -       RTE_LOG_DP(DEBUG, IPSEC, "Create session for SA spi %u on cryptodev "
> > > -                       "%u qp %u\n", sa->spi,
> > > -                       ipsec_ctx->tbl[cdev_id_qp].id,
> > > -                       ipsec_ctx->tbl[cdev_id_qp].qp);
> > > +       if ((sa == NULL) || (pool == NULL))
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > -       if (sa->type != RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE) {
> > > -               struct rte_security_session_conf sess_conf = {
> > > +       struct rte_security_session_conf sess_conf = {
> > >                         .action_type = sa->type,
> > >                         .protocol = RTE_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_IPSEC,
> > >                         {.ipsec = {
> > > @@ -90,247 +65,340 @@ create_session(struct ipsec_ctx *ipsec_ctx, struct
> > > ipsec_sa *sa)
> > >                         } },
> > >                         .crypto_xform = sa->xforms,
> > >                         .userdata = NULL,
> > > -
> > >                 };
> > >
> > > -               if (sa->type ==
> > RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL)
> > > {
> > > -                       struct rte_security_ctx *ctx = (struct rte_security_ctx *)
> > > -                                                       rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx(
> > > -                                                       ipsec_ctx->tbl[cdev_id_qp].id);
> > > -
> > > -                       /* Set IPsec parameters in conf */
> > > -                       set_ipsec_conf(sa, &(sess_conf.ipsec));
> > > -
> > > -                       sa->sec_session = rte_security_session_create(ctx,
> > > -                                       &sess_conf, ipsec_ctx->session_pool);
> > > -                       if (sa->sec_session == NULL) {
> > > -                               RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> > > -                               "SEC Session init failed: err: %d\n", ret);
> > > -                               return -1;
> > > -                       }
> > > -               } else if (sa->type == RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_INLINE_CRYPTO)
> > {
> > > -                       struct rte_flow_error err;
> > > -                       struct rte_security_ctx *ctx = (struct rte_security_ctx *)
> > > -                                                       rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx(
> > > -                                                       sa->portid);
> > > -                       const struct rte_security_capability *sec_cap;
> > > -                       int ret = 0;
> > > -
> > > -                       sa->sec_session = rte_security_session_create(ctx,
> > > -                                       &sess_conf, ipsec_ctx->session_pool);
> > > -                       if (sa->sec_session == NULL) {
> > > -                               RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> > > -                               "SEC Session init failed: err: %d\n", ret);
> > > -                               return -1;
> > > -                       }
> > > +       if (sa->type == RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL) {
> > > +               ctx = (struct rte_security_ctx *)
> > > +                               rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx(sa->portid);
> >
> > This is breaking the lookaside mode. Ctx was retrieved using the ipsec_ctx->tbl
> > struct rte_security_ctx *ctx = (struct rte_security_ctx *)
> > 				rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx(
> > 				ipsec_ctx->tbl[cdev_id_qp].id);
> >
> > I am looking into it, but I don't have time left to get it integrated in RC2. So this
> > has to be pushed to RC3
> 
> It looks like there are multiple issues in this patch wrt lookaside and none cases. Only the inline cases seem to be working.
> 
> 1. the patch removes the cdev_mapping concept completely. Cdev_id_qp is not getting used.

Not exactly.
cdev_id_qp is still setup, and is still used to decide to which crypto-dev to enqueuer the crypto-op:
ipsec_enqueue(...)
{
   ...
   enqueue_cop(&ipsec_ctx->tbl[sa->cdev_id_qp], &priv->cop);


Same in ipsec_process().

For initialization, yes cdev_id_qp is not used anymore.
As discussed here:
https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-March/127725.html

I think the problem you are hitting with lookaside-proto is that for it
we use 2 different values here: 
a) In create_sec_session we use portid (it also should be rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx() here)
    if (sa->type == RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL) {
                ctx = (struct rte_security_ctx *)
                                rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx(sa->portid);
b) in enqueue() we use cdev_id_qp

Right now these values could be different.
As I understand we need to make sure that fro lookaside-proto cdev_id_qp == portid provided by user, correct?


>     The port_id cannot be used in case of crypto, the mapping of cdev/qp/core is done differently for inbound and outbound ports which is
> missed in this patch.
> 
> 2. crypto sessions are created using the session mempool and the private data is allocated using the session priv_mempool which is
> removed in this patch. This will break cases where the priv data is more than the size of sess_mp element size.
>     Also the security sessions need to be allocated using the session_priv_mp instead of the session_mp.
> Please check this one.
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/52981/

Yes, I think you right, we need to use sess_private_pool here.

> 
> Ideally this issue should be resolved by adding another parameter in rte_security_session_create which can take another mempool pointer
> for private data allocation. But this cannot be done in this release as it would need a deprecation notice.
> 
> With the above issues I don't see your patch going in 19.05 release cycle.
> 
> Regards,
> Akhil
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > -                       sec_cap = rte_security_capabilities_get(ctx);
> > > +               /* Set IPsec parameters in conf */
> > > +               set_ipsec_conf(sa, &(sess_conf.ipsec));
> > >
> > > -                       /* iterate until ESP tunnel*/
> > > -                       while (sec_cap->action !=
> > > -                                       RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE) {
> > > +               sa->sec_session = rte_security_session_create(ctx,
> > > +                               &sess_conf, pool);
> > > +               if (sa->sec_session == NULL) {
> > > +                       RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> > > +                               "SEC Session init failed: err: %d\n",
> > > +                               ret);
> > > +                       return -1;
> > > +               }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-23 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-18 13:51 Akhil Goyal
2019-04-18 13:51 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-18 14:58 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-18 14:58   ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-18 15:23   ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-18 15:23     ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-23 11:14 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-23 11:14   ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-23 13:21   ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2019-04-23 13:21     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-23 13:32     ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-23 13:32       ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-23 14:04       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-23 14:04         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-24  6:34         ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-24  6:34           ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-24 10:40           ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-24 10:40             ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-05-13 14:29             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-13 14:29               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-27  8:58               ` Iremonger, Bernard
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-22  6:25 Akhil Goyal
2019-04-22  6:25 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-04 13:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix 1st pkt dropped Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-17 13:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix 1st packet dropped for inline crypto Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-17 13:42   ` Bernard Iremonger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580148A9B0D4@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).