From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
"Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix 1st packet dropped for inline crypto
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:04:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580148A9B10E@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190423140430.HmJfW47HQVCf1klrVBUG10m-Hp3k1eTUT6M6-3MoE1o@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB4893B72E0C0CC702C42F67B9E6230@VI1PR04MB4893.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Akhil Goyal
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 7:21 PM
> > > > To: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> > > > konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
> > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix 1st packet dropped
> > for
> > > > inline crypto
> > > >
> > > > Hi Bernard,
> > > >
> > > > > - RTE_LOG_DP(DEBUG, IPSEC, "Create session for SA spi %u on
> > cryptodev "
> > > > > - "%u qp %u\n", sa->spi,
> > > > > - ipsec_ctx->tbl[cdev_id_qp].id,
> > > > > - ipsec_ctx->tbl[cdev_id_qp].qp);
> > > > > + if ((sa == NULL) || (pool == NULL))
> > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (sa->type != RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE) {
> > > > > - struct rte_security_session_conf sess_conf = {
> > > > > + struct rte_security_session_conf sess_conf = {
> > > > > .action_type = sa->type,
> > > > > .protocol = RTE_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_IPSEC,
> > > > > {.ipsec = {
> > > > > @@ -90,247 +65,340 @@ create_session(struct ipsec_ctx *ipsec_ctx,
> > struct
> > > > > ipsec_sa *sa)
> > > > > } },
> > > > > .crypto_xform = sa->xforms,
> > > > > .userdata = NULL,
> > > > > -
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (sa->type ==
> > > > RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - struct rte_security_ctx *ctx = (struct rte_security_ctx *)
> > > > > - rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx(
> > > > > - ipsec_ctx->tbl[cdev_id_qp].id);
> > > > > -
> > > > > - /* Set IPsec parameters in conf */
> > > > > - set_ipsec_conf(sa, &(sess_conf.ipsec));
> > > > > -
> > > > > - sa->sec_session = rte_security_session_create(ctx,
> > > > > - &sess_conf, ipsec_ctx->session_pool);
> > > > > - if (sa->sec_session == NULL) {
> > > > > - RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> > > > > - "SEC Session init failed: err: %d\n", ret);
> > > > > - return -1;
> > > > > - }
> > > > > - } else if (sa->type ==
> > RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_INLINE_CRYPTO)
> > > > {
> > > > > - struct rte_flow_error err;
> > > > > - struct rte_security_ctx *ctx = (struct rte_security_ctx *)
> > > > > - rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx(
> > > > > - sa->portid);
> > > > > - const struct rte_security_capability *sec_cap;
> > > > > - int ret = 0;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - sa->sec_session = rte_security_session_create(ctx,
> > > > > - &sess_conf, ipsec_ctx->session_pool);
> > > > > - if (sa->sec_session == NULL) {
> > > > > - RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
> > > > > - "SEC Session init failed: err: %d\n", ret);
> > > > > - return -1;
> > > > > - }
> > > > > + if (sa->type ==
> > RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL) {
> > > > > + ctx = (struct rte_security_ctx *)
> > > > > + rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx(sa->portid);
> > > >
> > > > This is breaking the lookaside mode. Ctx was retrieved using the ipsec_ctx-
> > >tbl
> > > > struct rte_security_ctx *ctx = (struct rte_security_ctx *)
> > > > rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx(
> > > > ipsec_ctx->tbl[cdev_id_qp].id);
> > > >
> > > > I am looking into it, but I don't have time left to get it integrated in RC2. So
> > this
> > > > has to be pushed to RC3
> > >
> > > It looks like there are multiple issues in this patch wrt lookaside and none cases.
> > Only the inline cases seem to be working.
> > >
> > > 1. the patch removes the cdev_mapping concept completely. Cdev_id_qp is
> > not getting used.
> >
> > Not exactly.
> > cdev_id_qp is still setup, and is still used to decide to which crypto-dev to
> > enqueuer the crypto-op:
> > ipsec_enqueue(...)
> > {
> > ...
> > enqueue_cop(&ipsec_ctx->tbl[sa->cdev_id_qp], &priv->cop);
>
> I don't see anybody filling "sa->cdev_id_qp". Please let me know if I have missed it somewhere.
> It is memset to 0 I guess.
Yep, true we lost it somewhere during the rework.
>
> >
> >
> > Same in ipsec_process().
> >
> > For initialization, yes cdev_id_qp is not used anymore.
> > As discussed here:
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmails.dp
> > dk.org%2Farchives%2Fdev%2F2019-
> > March%2F127725.html&data=02%7C01%7Cakhil.goyal%40nxp.com%7C04
> > 194193cfc04c0b629008d6c7eea247%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%
> > 7C0%7C0%7C636916225072561313&sdata=ga9IiqhYRWOz9QkRDIXNiigInk
> > soVGgu1E5EetqvE%2FA%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > I think the problem you are hitting with lookaside-proto is that for it
> > we use 2 different values here:
> > a) In create_sec_session we use portid (it also should be
> > rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx() here)
> > if (sa->type == RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_LOOKASIDE_PROTOCOL) {
> > ctx = (struct rte_security_ctx *)
> > rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx(sa->portid);
> It should be rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx in the first place. And it needs a cdev_id as input based on the cdev mapping done while initializing
> the cryptodev and neither the portid and nor cdev_id_qp.
> > b) in enqueue() we use cdev_id_qp
> >
> > Right now these values could be different.
> > As I understand we need to make sure that fro lookaside-proto cdev_id_qp ==
> > portid provided by user, correct?
> No it is not the case. Right now for lookaside there is no use of portid in case of lookaside case.
> As the cdev/qp/core mappings are managed internally and the user cannot tweak it from cfg file.
>
Hmm, then at least that line is wrong here:
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.html
sa out 5 cipher_algo aes-128-cbc cipher_key 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 \
auth_algo sha1-hmac auth_key 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 \
mode ipv4-tunnel src 172.16.1.5 dst 172.16.2.5 \
type lookaside-protocol-offload port_id 4
And probably:
"Port/device ID of the ethernet/crypto accelerator for which the SA is configured."
Need to be rephrased to remove crypto accelerator notice.
Another question - why you guys don't consider using portid for lookaside-proto?
As I can see add_mapping(function that fills cdev_id_qp) doesn't bother to check
which rte_security protocols are supported (only crypto capabilities are checked).
So not sure does current code will work ok with a mix of lookaside-none/lookaside-proto devices.
Forcing user to specify crypto-dev id for lookaside-proto (via portid or so)
will simplify things significantly.
Konstantin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-23 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-18 13:51 Akhil Goyal
2019-04-18 13:51 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-18 14:58 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-18 14:58 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-18 15:23 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-18 15:23 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-23 11:14 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-23 11:14 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-23 13:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-23 13:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-23 13:32 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-23 13:32 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-23 14:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2019-04-23 14:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-24 6:34 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-24 6:34 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-24 10:40 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-24 10:40 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-05-13 14:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-13 14:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-27 8:58 ` Iremonger, Bernard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-22 6:25 Akhil Goyal
2019-04-22 6:25 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-04 13:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix 1st pkt dropped Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-17 13:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix 1st packet dropped for inline crypto Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-17 13:42 ` Bernard Iremonger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580148A9B10E@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).