From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA1EA05D3
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:13:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4752F1B101;
	Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:13:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-eopbgr60058.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.6.58])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E21F7D4A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:13:47 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Mellanox.com;
 s=selector1;
 h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
 bh=Ss61fBLnM06JANlLAucPnlehcjJAutKeNB1VU1hMWiE=;
 b=L9ZVA/l8kjQgeXIXPlvCALjvliSWcv+AgnSe8vn3xwUk9v57yGrw+HXxTW5i7t3EO9R805rmgMxwXMD+mmTFsjmFW/1uIRRZ/oe0UvQ3Lap6c2fAGYEh23DZ4Y4Rx0ucnNq6Lp0aaqt13xNm5oc7Vxh1bzw3sOYekA6ugV1jW4M=
Received: from DB3PR0502MB3980.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.134.72.27) by
 DB3PR0502MB3993.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.134.70.154) with Microsoft SMTP
 Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 15.20.1813.16; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 20:13:46 +0000
Received: from DB3PR0502MB3980.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com
 ([fe80::e8d5:4aff:902d:6e98]) by DB3PR0502MB3980.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com
 ([fe80::e8d5:4aff:902d:6e98%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1835.010; Tue, 23 Apr 2019
 20:13:46 +0000
From: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
CC: Herakliusz Lipiec <herakliusz.lipiec@intel.com>, "shafafs@mellanox.com"
 <shafafs@mellanox.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/8] ipc: fix net/mlx5 memleak
Thread-Index: AQHU9Sv3c7FJmMCo+UGMLgfsf7sqx6ZIfb2AgADvlACAAMpxAA==
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 20:13:45 +0000
Message-ID: <F7810CC0-CDE9-42C3-8D76-F07CF8195B90@mellanox.com>
References: <20190417144436.24216-1-herakliusz.lipiec@intel.com>
 <CB3736B6-914C-40E9-A6A3-8CA8E3C61F59@mellanox.com>
 <e2ef8184-4cf6-b930-aaf5-a5351b51c6a4@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <e2ef8184-4cf6-b930-aaf5-a5351b51c6a4@intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is )
 smtp.mailfrom=yskoh@mellanox.com; 
x-originating-ip: [69.181.245.183]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ca947fbd-c957-4219-aa91-08d6c82830a8
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0;
 RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020);
 SRVR:DB3PR0502MB3993; 
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB3PR0502MB3993:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB3PR0502MB3993BCF04A0A45F7CB472EF7C3230@DB3PR0502MB3993.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0016DEFF96
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;
 SFS:(10009020)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(346002)(376002)(189003)(199004)(43544003)(8936002)(256004)(25786009)(45080400002)(76176011)(97736004)(83716004)(66066001)(102836004)(26005)(53546011)(14454004)(14444005)(966005)(33656002)(7736002)(6506007)(229853002)(71190400001)(71200400001)(478600001)(6486002)(6436002)(68736007)(5660300002)(446003)(82746002)(11346002)(6512007)(305945005)(53936002)(91956017)(6306002)(86362001)(64756008)(316002)(2906002)(36756003)(2616005)(8676002)(486006)(476003)(6916009)(4326008)(73956011)(99286004)(66946007)(66556008)(66446008)(66476007)(186003)(6246003)(6116002)(81156014)(76116006)(81166006)(54906003)(3846002);
 DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DB3PR0502MB3993;
 H:DB3PR0502MB3980.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
 PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; 
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: mellanox.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: a7g9Rh8PZSzslkGSeBpN0wpj+YBgLWpiV3Z8EfEYCkPpetevyoPutewL33mfo9F6c4SnEQawBlRuoQONI1OiaWjwu8ci08228atBtS4IJ+hp0zh2R9vJK9c5gBdXIOnphHt6n7CjJoUk5G3UUZgOPDfxVPAVX8W1RwXK5Di1ycnMF+gzJQv824hGTRY6TiKHOlMy6SOSv90p/oqFhrr5rHRu0VIMoL60IDaAgypA23MJJVQ1YckNlnrQHTdP2fHK5UgWgymjkopp2gOWKoRKfT07rNXEFaTxcaE5CqWkZ1//KbPLLS7xZzqZYM8u0Hm51Z+QnkFKjaa3zyiloZNHEYZAZxlF5ckp9tIaqaJhb+YaN6Y1UUhZ+9sdSqUYkO/dEGeTOdpvcZlyHX6Wt3kUhJGdpEjIzwZNc9S3ix25K3U=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <ACAE7B48610A1C4E811386C134088ABA@eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Mellanox.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ca947fbd-c957-4219-aa91-08d6c82830a8
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Apr 2019 20:13:45.9020 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: a652971c-7d2e-4d9b-a6a4-d149256f461b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3PR0502MB3993
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/8] ipc: fix net/mlx5 memleak
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20190423201345._uVdEGOWG8esw7kITuTrPenTGmrkbI0rGoaleKCQO30@z>


> On Apr 23, 2019, at 1:09 AM, Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>=
 wrote:
>=20
> On 22-Apr-19 6:51 PM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
>>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 7:44 AM, Herakliusz Lipiec <herakliusz.lipiec@intel=
.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> When sending multiple requests, rte_mp_request_sync
>>> can succeed sending a few of those requests, but then
>>> fail on a later one and in the end return with rc=3D-1.
>>> The upper layers - e.g. device hotplug - currently
>>> handles this case as if no messages were sent and no
>>> memory for response buffers was allocated, which is
>>> not true. Fixed by always freeing reply message buffers.
>>>=20
>>> Fixes: 9a8ab29b84d3 ("net/mlx5: replace IPC socket with EAL API")
>>> Fixes: c18cf501a7af ("net/mlx5: enable secondary process to register DM=
A memory")
>>> Cc: yskoh@mellanox.com
>>> Signed-off-by: Herakliusz Lipiec <herakliusz.lipiec@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mp.c | 4 +++-
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>=20
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mp.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mp.c
>>> index cea74adb6..c9915b1d5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mp.c
>>> @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ mlx5_mp_req_mr_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint=
ptr_t addr)
>>> 	if (ret) {
>>> 		DRV_LOG(ERR, "port %u request to primary process failed",
>>> 			dev->data->port_id);
>>> +		free(mp_rep.msgs);
>>> 		return -rte_errno;
>>> 	}
>>> 	assert(mp_rep.nb_received =3D=3D 1);
>>> @@ -295,7 +296,8 @@ mlx5_mp_req_verbs_cmd_fd(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>> 	if (ret) {
>>> 		DRV_LOG(ERR, "port %u request to primary process failed",
>>> 			dev->data->port_id);
>>> -		return -rte_errno;
>>> +		ret =3D -rte_errno;
>>> +		goto exit;
>> These two requests will be made by a secondary process targeting to the =
primary.
>> Then, there's only one request in this case and we don't need to take ca=
re of that.
>> Right?
>> Same comment for mlx4.
>=20
> Hi Yongseok,
>=20
> mp_rep.msgs is potentially allocated regardless of whether you're in prim=
ary or secondary, and whether the call to mp_request_sync succeeded or fail=
ed. Hence, need to free in all cases.

Then, it looks fine to me.

>=20
> See this patch: https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhtt=
p%3A%2F%2Fpatches.dpdk.org%2Fpatch%2F52868%2F&amp;data=3D02%7C01%7Cyskoh%40=
mellanox.com%7C007b61ef9d964dc79e7108d6c7c2f9d8%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d1492=
56f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636916037564345993&amp;sdata=3DO%2BoG%2F8P8cXwKS%2FDfZyMi=
G3CiIDpeXe3dPMJgVilzFWY%3D&amp;reserved=3D0
> and this bug: https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttps=
%3A%2F%2Fbugs.dpdk.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D228&amp;data=3D02%7C01%7Cyskoh=
%40mellanox.com%7C007b61ef9d964dc79e7108d6c7c2f9d8%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d1=
49256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636916037564345993&amp;sdata=3DjLA5wLqT%2BfW3p79rg2SVE=
Z16GS37dgqdF4NwmiRU%2B7A%3D&amp;reserved=3D0
>=20
>> Thanks,
>> Yongseok
>>> 	}
>>> 	assert(mp_rep.nb_received =3D=3D 1);
>>> 	mp_res =3D &mp_rep.msgs[0];
>>> --=20
>>> 2.17.2
>>>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Thanks,
> Anatoly