DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "Su, Simei" <simei.su@intel.com>,
	"Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	 "Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [DPDK] net/ice: fix Rx statistics
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:34:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wDJktTQVS7pVHhXEjvw2NuD8UHJDQ4EW1g1_YiwceeGw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190425073422.FWVJ9eqsIBfUG9R4nsexneA_xo6zauqoMZEO5juL97U@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115336F811@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 9:30 AM Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi David:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Marchand
> > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 3:13 PM
> > To: Su, Simei <simei.su@intel.com>
> > Cc: qi.zi.zhang@intel.com; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Yang,
> > Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; dev <dev@dpdk.org>; dpdk stable
> > <stable@dpdk.org>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [DPDK] net/ice: fix Rx statistics
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:47 AM simei <simei.su@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The RX stats will increase even no packets sent, this patch fix this
> > > issue by modifying ipackets and ibytes statistics based on vsi instead
> > > of port to avoid statistics error.
> > >
> > > Fixes: a37bde56314d ("net/ice: support statistics")
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Simei Su <simei.su@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c | 9 ++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c index 0946b19..1c851ac 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> > > @@ -3305,15 +3305,14 @@ static int ice_rx_queue_intr_disable(struct
> > > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > >         /* call read registers - updates values, now write them to
> > > struct */
> > >         ice_read_stats_registers(pf, hw);
> > >
> > > -       stats->ipackets = ns->eth.rx_unicast +
> > > -                         ns->eth.rx_multicast +
> > > -                         ns->eth.rx_broadcast -
> > > -                         ns->eth.rx_discards -
> > > +       stats->ipackets = pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_unicast +
> > > +                         pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_multicast +
> > > +                         pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_broadcast -
> > >                           pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_discards;
> > >         stats->opackets = ns->eth.tx_unicast +
> > >                           ns->eth.tx_multicast +
> > >                           ns->eth.tx_broadcast;
> > > -       stats->ibytes   = ns->eth.rx_bytes;
> > > +       stats->ibytes   = pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_bytes;
> > >         stats->obytes   = ns->eth.tx_bytes;
> > >         stats->oerrors  = ns->eth.tx_errors +
> > >                           pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.tx_errors;
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3.1
> > >
> > >
> > I don't know this hw nor this code.
> > However, from the description and this snippet, it looks like
> > opackets/obytes/oerrors are still referring to port stats instead of the
> pf stats.
> > Can you elaborate ?
>
> For Rx, packet comes to port then vsi,  so we count vsi->rx for how many
> valid packet we received.
> For Tx, packet comes to vsi then port,  so we count port->tx for how many
> packet we exactly sent out?
>
> Does this make sense?
>

Well, sorry, but no :-)
But if you are sure this is the right way, go with it.


-- 
David Marchand

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-25  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-24  7:06 simei
2019-04-24  7:06 ` simei
2019-04-25  7:06 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-04-25  7:06   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-04-25  7:12 ` David Marchand
2019-04-25  7:12   ` David Marchand
2019-04-25  7:30   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-04-25  7:30     ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-04-25  7:34     ` David Marchand [this message]
2019-04-25  7:34       ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8wDJktTQVS7pVHhXEjvw2NuD8UHJDQ4EW1g1_YiwceeGw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=simei.su@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).