From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCE3A05D3
for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:27:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740211B601;
Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:27:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18581B39B;
Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:27:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32])
by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
26 Apr 2019 03:27:19 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,397,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="340983972"
Received: from silpixa00399498.ir.intel.com (HELO
silpixa00399498.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.237.223.125])
by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2019 03:27:18 -0700
From: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:27:17 +0100
Message-Id:
<708fbde65c4d7eb3a93f957287caf564e363e33c.1556274407.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ipc: fix send error handling
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID: <20190426102717.66pokoAj1kUu0A67_LIBTPiHkyIw2Q6fv73DC7tV0Q4@z>
According to manpage, ENOBUFS error indicates that either the
input or the output queue is full. This should be considered
an error, but it is treated as an "ignore" condition. Fix the
code to report an error instead.
Fixes: bacaa2754017 ("eal: add channel for multi-process communication")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
index b46d644b3..f26a60595 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
@@ -678,11 +678,6 @@ send_msg(const char *dst_path, struct rte_mp_msg *msg, int type)
unlink(dst_path);
return 0;
}
- if (errno == ENOBUFS) {
- RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Peer cannot receive message %s\n",
- dst_path);
- return 0;
- }
RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "failed to send to (%s) due to %s\n",
dst_path, strerror(errno));
return -1;
--
2.17.1