From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66250A0679
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:55:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5115F2D;
	Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:54:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3F95F2C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:54:57 +0200 (CEST)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51])
 by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 30 Apr 2019 02:54:55 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,413,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="140058130"
Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.155])
 by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2019 02:54:53 -0700
Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.115]) by
 IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.21]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000;
 Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:54:40 +0100
From: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
CC: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>, "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX"
 <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>, "Iremonger, Bernard"
 <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>, "anoobj@marvell.com" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
 "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] test/crypto: added NULL algo tests to loop test mechanism
Thread-Index: AQHU/GbGsXz5fhLLI0+sAaoZjuoqNaZUQMAAgAA6r8A=
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:54:39 +0000
Message-ID:
 <348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B4358974F09D@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1556307118-16624-1-git-send-email-fiona.trahe@intel.com>
 <VI1PR04MB4893AEC543FE323D8CDCBCE8E63A0@VI1PR04MB4893.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB4893AEC543FE323D8CDCBCE8E63A0@VI1PR04MB4893.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNmZhOTA5ZWQtY2Y5ZC00YTU2LTk3ZDAtNmY2ZGIzNTlkNzBlIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiUnlhK3V0QVlvcXNvZWVCTnpxWityRFoxeHV1SGk3SDk5RTVEcDNib1lXK3Nid3ZLRU1lNFdyODF6S3BWUVZDMSJ9
x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.600.7
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/crypto: added NULL algo tests to loop
 test mechanism
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20190430095439.XX_XgeIR6zKZhzjo5jBWX9m3TfA7mFfOV827q5bm7IY@z>

Hi Akhil,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.goyal@nxp.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 8:20 AM
> To: Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.co=
m>; Iremonger, Bernard
> <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; anoobj@marvell.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] test/crypto: added NULL algo tests to loop test mech=
anism
>=20
> Hi Fiona,
>=20
> I believe this patch is for 19.08, we normally do not accept such changes=
 in RC4.
[Fiona] Yes, it's for 19.08.  Sorry, I should probably have indicated this =
in the header.=20

> Also the patch
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/53117/
> looks to be meaningful if this patch is accepted.
> Do you want we to apply the fix in driver in this release and add the tes=
t cases in the next release, or
> should I defer both in next release.
[Fiona] Please apply the driver fix in this release and the test code in th=
e  next release.