From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id D686DA0679
for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed, 1 May 2019 00:32:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEBE5699;
Wed, 1 May 2019 00:32:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com
[148.163.156.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478CA532C
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 1 May 2019 00:32:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id
x3UMQw80042879 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:32:52 -0400
Received: from e13.ny.us.ibm.com (e13.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.203])
by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2s6xhhseyd-1
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:32:52 -0400
Received: from localhost
by e13.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only!
Violators will be prosecuted
for <dev@dpdk.org> from <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 23:32:51 +0100
Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.25)
by e13.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.200) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized
Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted;
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256)
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 23:32:49 +0100
Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com
[9.57.199.108])
by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
x3UMWmp530146644
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK);
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:32:48 GMT
Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CC4B2064;
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:32:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1E2B2068;
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:32:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from oprom9.localdomain (unknown [9.40.204.34])
by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:32:48 +0000 (GMT)
From: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:32:44 -0500
X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
x-cbid: 19043022-0064-0000-0000-000003D4C39D
X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores:
X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011025; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007;
PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000285; SDB=6.01196744; UDB=6.00627628; IPR=6.00977594;
MB=3.00026674; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-04-30 22:32:50
X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused
x-cbparentid: 19043022-0065-0000-0000-00003D45F636
Message-Id: <1556663564-39653-1-git-send-email-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, ,
definitions=2019-04-30_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0
priorityscore=1501
malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0
clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0
mlxlogscore=671 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904300132
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] test: verify calloc succeeded for sum
variable
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID: <20190430223244.SWcoioi0GWBm0XTIdWGOp2jK5qDR-XkAg_oRaH5lbR8@z>
Code tested calloc failures for pt & lpt variables
but not for the sum variable. Add a test for calloc
failure of sum.
Signed-off-by: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
app/test/test_barrier.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_barrier.c b/app/test/test_barrier.c
index c219d56..ae37b1e 100644
--- a/app/test/test_barrier.c
+++ b/app/test/test_barrier.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ struct lcore_plock_test {
printf("%s(iter=%u, utype=%u) started on %u lcores\n",
__func__, iter, utype, n);
- if (pt == NULL || lpt == NULL) {
+ if (pt == NULL || lpt == NULL || sum == NULL) {
printf("%s: failed to allocate memory for %u lcores\n",
__func__, n);
free(pt);
--
1.8.3.1