From: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
To: yskoh@mellanox.com, shahafs@mellanox.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix init with zero Rx queues
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 13:49:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02664e0b50e375e0b0d4ee05c8ad554295b0ccde.1556794185.git.dekelp@mellanox.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190502104916.A4o62tG1O5UzC4OzCvftijz53oteqbu3OOorJ_nIYP0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e05ed88b7c39457313d86056e282e1aebf2cbb99.1556779259.git.dekelp@mellanox.com>
Recent patch [1] added, at the end of mlx5_dev_configure(), a call to
mlx5_proc_priv_init(), initializing process_private data of eth_dev.
This call is not reached if PMD is started with zero Rx queues.
In this case mlx5_dev_configure() returns earlier due to the check:
if (rxqs_n == priv->rxqs_n)
return 0;
In such a scenario, later references to uninitialized process_private
data will result in segmentation fault.
For example see in function txq_uar_init().
This patch changes the check logic. The following code is executed
if (rxqs_n != priv->rxqs_n), and skipped otherwise.
Function mlx5_proc_priv_init() is always invoked, to ensure
process_private data is initialized.
[1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/52629/
Fixes: 120dc4a7dcd3 ("net/mlx5: remove device register remap")
Cc: yskoh@mellanox.com
Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
---
v2: Update logic after code review.
---
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_ethdev.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_ethdev.c
index 35d276d..e898c2c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_ethdev.c
@@ -435,33 +435,37 @@ struct ethtool_link_settings {
rte_errno = EINVAL;
return -rte_errno;
}
- if (rxqs_n == priv->rxqs_n)
- return 0;
- DRV_LOG(INFO, "port %u Rx queues number update: %u -> %u",
- dev->data->port_id, priv->rxqs_n, rxqs_n);
- priv->rxqs_n = rxqs_n;
- /*
- * WHen using LRO, MPRQ is implicitly enabled.
- * Adjust threshold value to ensure MPRQ can be enabled.
- */
- if (lro_on && priv->config.mprq.min_rxqs_num > priv->rxqs_n)
- priv->config.mprq.min_rxqs_num = priv->rxqs_n;
- /* If the requested number of RX queues is not a power of two, use the
- * maximum indirection table size for better balancing.
- * The result is always rounded to the next power of two. */
- reta_idx_n = (1 << log2above((rxqs_n & (rxqs_n - 1)) ?
- priv->config.ind_table_max_size :
- rxqs_n));
- ret = mlx5_rss_reta_index_resize(dev, reta_idx_n);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- /* When the number of RX queues is not a power of two, the remaining
- * table entries are padded with reused WQs and hashes are not spread
- * uniformly. */
- for (i = 0, j = 0; (i != reta_idx_n); ++i) {
- (*priv->reta_idx)[i] = j;
- if (++j == rxqs_n)
- j = 0;
+ if (rxqs_n != priv->rxqs_n) {
+ DRV_LOG(INFO, "port %u Rx queues number update: %u -> %u",
+ dev->data->port_id, priv->rxqs_n, rxqs_n);
+ priv->rxqs_n = rxqs_n;
+ /*
+ * WHen using LRO, MPRQ is implicitly enabled.
+ * Adjust threshold value to ensure MPRQ can be enabled.
+ */
+ if (lro_on && priv->config.mprq.min_rxqs_num > priv->rxqs_n)
+ priv->config.mprq.min_rxqs_num = priv->rxqs_n;
+ /*
+ * If the requested number of RX queues is not a power of two,
+ * use the maximum indirection table size for better balancing.
+ * The result is always rounded to the next power of two.
+ */
+ reta_idx_n = (1 << log2above((rxqs_n & (rxqs_n - 1)) ?
+ priv->config.ind_table_max_size :
+ rxqs_n));
+ ret = mlx5_rss_reta_index_resize(dev, reta_idx_n);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ /*
+ * When the number of RX queues is not a power of two, the
+ * remaining table entries are padded with reused WQs and
+ * hashes are not spread uniformly.
+ */
+ for (i = 0, j = 0; (i != reta_idx_n); ++i) {
+ (*priv->reta_idx)[i] = j;
+ if (++j == rxqs_n)
+ j = 0;
+ }
}
ret = mlx5_proc_priv_init(dev);
if (ret)
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-02 6:39 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Dekel Peled
2019-05-02 6:39 ` Dekel Peled
2019-05-02 10:49 ` Dekel Peled [this message]
2019-05-02 10:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Dekel Peled
2019-05-05 11:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Dekel Peled
2019-05-05 11:44 ` Dekel Peled
2019-05-08 4:44 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-05-08 4:44 ` Shahaf Shuler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02664e0b50e375e0b0d4ee05c8ad554295b0ccde.1556794185.git.dekelp@mellanox.com \
--to=dekelp@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).