From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] examples/l3fwd: support separate buffer pool per port
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 01:22:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2511331.Laj1Cp0Ard@xps> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190502232252.UJHz4SQ6HVg8RZmGsmyLR5mwSmFTGQTaoEyn_hwV9dw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190425094019.11430-1-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
25/04/2019 11:40, Shreyansh Jain:
> Traditionally, only a single buffer pool per port
> (or, per-port-per-socket) is created in l3fwd application.
>
> If separate pools are created per-port, it might lead to gain in
> performance as packet alloc/dealloc requests would be isolated
> across ports (and their corresponding lcores).
>
> This patch adds an argument '--per-port-pool' to the l3fwd application.
> By default, old mode of single pool per port (split on sockets) is
> active.
>
> L3fwd user guide is also updated by this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
> Acked-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Applied, thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-03 11:30 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Shreyansh Jain
2019-04-04 11:54 ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-04-04 11:54 ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-04-08 6:10 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-04-08 6:10 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-04-08 9:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-08 9:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-12 9:24 ` Shreyansh Jain
2019-04-12 9:24 ` Shreyansh Jain
2019-04-14 9:13 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-04-14 9:13 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-04-15 12:05 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-15 12:05 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-25 9:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Shreyansh Jain
2019-04-25 9:40 ` Shreyansh Jain
2019-05-02 23:22 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-05-02 23:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2511331.Laj1Cp0Ard@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).