From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com
 [209.85.214.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13012C17
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  3 May 2019 21:03:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id y3so3126386plp.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=8hc8nRfPSoSc3P8QdYXXeIku+I52BJ39c3jBz+Qr774=;
 b=OXtgOcWfkBWgH1B6ZkMBvbfBbST2EUAUiyhaWKj6vBMi8eXsSZYegbIH2iUxSOrsPg
 tQPztC3C4G9D+j7FNdVhcoHoGN3omU8cEKeCZc2yIcOBiZv73FzLfgs5kSKb18V2GGy3
 5Mn2QH1k8GYrsrqMjy7kGmTJaYJIOMEbEOalax5ow25tS9wJqqykUWjeZboAc9t6+hE5
 dRQ3Z9O7RDgv8x1x5VA0YMLRd66heL+B1kRVNiPVz1hfymY/dTBJv2jImfqKrMy+El55
 ER5hMAhSHUC+7wc1edGffc01hLhinQIsUzDMuqqMutiU/lBYcgXWvRfL5Yzm2uIPJeED
 9S9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=8hc8nRfPSoSc3P8QdYXXeIku+I52BJ39c3jBz+Qr774=;
 b=IfWqLybAYbjOKtbvlwYIfOXmINkrQ6dGuvywMD0VTd6lTqoqmVisEPO+r/GzFS9lwt
 LHlF7qU3DpLiKxux1ApnQBHZBy5/83nYoMzMV5V63X3CL8ujqDGPzentlK1R0NG/jtfm
 upPri3SFb80jPfTjkwY7N1ogxDxXlxR/qgGcG2zITvCnzuQwRcFrExNXSe491WYlBQ5E
 8FZI6EWamvqzkfw3bn+9/HYlsycWdpOo86B25stKJXBFiYeNNBYyV5VAaMSd8XJMoEDl
 Fj9GdKKDf1mmasKJiOQGah02A7TFwcgos32gLY28Tgmlq0r3I0dLM4mtgmkIjFW9l5X6
 noSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvCr3txnUIX9oEjIs8DiuE/E5WpNDFBhYAhlov173ABIwz3VJv
 m/qOMCYwZ4sOPbP4JF89f2X1Zw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyc9gaMkhMI98crmkLrz5KuGucOw5ENMjdVJRZI6vv/2/bTqT6ihna2wBGUEYZCcFBDprrL8A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:684b:: with SMTP id
 f11mr4775799pln.96.1556910202049; 
 Fri, 03 May 2019 12:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y68sm4104554pfy.28.2019.05.03.12.03.21
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 03 May 2019 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 12:03:14 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: P Smith <dpdk_learn-dev@yahoo.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20190503120314.146732cd@hermes.lan>
In-Reply-To: <c1aee76a-1adb-43a5-70f9-f44a3c74d4f9@intel.com>
References: <899934402.3791304.1556876242992.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
 <899934402.3791304.1556876242992@mail.yahoo.com>
 <c1aee76a-1adb-43a5-70f9-f44a3c74d4f9@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Memory footprint of a PMD
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 19:03:23 -0000

On Fri, 3 May 2019 11:02:15 +0100
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote:

> On 03-May-19 10:37 AM, P Smith wrote:
> > Hi,=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Given that a dpdk driver uses rte_malloc_xx=
() and friends to allocate/free its memory what is the best way to find out=
 the runtime memory footprint of a PMD ? One can use 'malloc_info' to dump =
the malloc output in case of general 'malloc' ...but what is the way here s=
ince it's all hugepages ? How to know the memory /footprint of my testpmd /=
application at different points during run-time?Is there a tool or some API=
 i can invoke to find out the same?
> > Thanks=C2=A0P
> >  =20
>=20
> I don't think there is a way to do this currently, other than tracing=20
> all PMD's allocations.
>=20
> That said, there is an API to find total usage of DPDK memory - look int=
=20
> rte_malloc_heap_stats related API's.
>=20

rte_malloc and friends allocate from memory pool in huge pages, not the nor=
mal
malloc heap. The mempool does have compile option for debug which does keep=
 statistics.
Then rte_mempool_dump (or rte_mempool_walk and rte_mempool_dump) can be use=
d to show info.

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1706A0AC5
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri,  3 May 2019 21:03:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D270293B;
	Fri,  3 May 2019 21:03:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com
 [209.85.214.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13012C17
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  3 May 2019 21:03:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id y3so3126386plp.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=8hc8nRfPSoSc3P8QdYXXeIku+I52BJ39c3jBz+Qr774=;
 b=OXtgOcWfkBWgH1B6ZkMBvbfBbST2EUAUiyhaWKj6vBMi8eXsSZYegbIH2iUxSOrsPg
 tQPztC3C4G9D+j7FNdVhcoHoGN3omU8cEKeCZc2yIcOBiZv73FzLfgs5kSKb18V2GGy3
 5Mn2QH1k8GYrsrqMjy7kGmTJaYJIOMEbEOalax5ow25tS9wJqqykUWjeZboAc9t6+hE5
 dRQ3Z9O7RDgv8x1x5VA0YMLRd66heL+B1kRVNiPVz1hfymY/dTBJv2jImfqKrMy+El55
 ER5hMAhSHUC+7wc1edGffc01hLhinQIsUzDMuqqMutiU/lBYcgXWvRfL5Yzm2uIPJeED
 9S9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=8hc8nRfPSoSc3P8QdYXXeIku+I52BJ39c3jBz+Qr774=;
 b=IfWqLybAYbjOKtbvlwYIfOXmINkrQ6dGuvywMD0VTd6lTqoqmVisEPO+r/GzFS9lwt
 LHlF7qU3DpLiKxux1ApnQBHZBy5/83nYoMzMV5V63X3CL8ujqDGPzentlK1R0NG/jtfm
 upPri3SFb80jPfTjkwY7N1ogxDxXlxR/qgGcG2zITvCnzuQwRcFrExNXSe491WYlBQ5E
 8FZI6EWamvqzkfw3bn+9/HYlsycWdpOo86B25stKJXBFiYeNNBYyV5VAaMSd8XJMoEDl
 Fj9GdKKDf1mmasKJiOQGah02A7TFwcgos32gLY28Tgmlq0r3I0dLM4mtgmkIjFW9l5X6
 noSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvCr3txnUIX9oEjIs8DiuE/E5WpNDFBhYAhlov173ABIwz3VJv
 m/qOMCYwZ4sOPbP4JF89f2X1Zw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyc9gaMkhMI98crmkLrz5KuGucOw5ENMjdVJRZI6vv/2/bTqT6ihna2wBGUEYZCcFBDprrL8A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:684b:: with SMTP id
 f11mr4775799pln.96.1556910202049; 
 Fri, 03 May 2019 12:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y68sm4104554pfy.28.2019.05.03.12.03.21
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 03 May 2019 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 12:03:14 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: P Smith <dpdk_learn-dev@yahoo.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20190503120314.146732cd@hermes.lan>
In-Reply-To: <c1aee76a-1adb-43a5-70f9-f44a3c74d4f9@intel.com>
References: <899934402.3791304.1556876242992.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
 <899934402.3791304.1556876242992@mail.yahoo.com>
 <c1aee76a-1adb-43a5-70f9-f44a3c74d4f9@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Memory footprint of a PMD
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20190503190314.5QT5aIyVLY7DNi6bmzJnWoqCvZNdVbnW12Or_zBKERs@z>

On Fri, 3 May 2019 11:02:15 +0100
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote:

> On 03-May-19 10:37 AM, P Smith wrote:
> > Hi,=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Given that a dpdk driver uses rte_malloc_xx=
() and friends to allocate/free its memory what is the best way to find out=
 the runtime memory footprint of a PMD ? One can use 'malloc_info' to dump =
the malloc output in case of general 'malloc' ...but what is the way here s=
ince it's all hugepages ? How to know the memory /footprint of my testpmd /=
application at different points during run-time?Is there a tool or some API=
 i can invoke to find out the same?
> > Thanks=C2=A0P
> >  =20
>=20
> I don't think there is a way to do this currently, other than tracing=20
> all PMD's allocations.
>=20
> That said, there is an API to find total usage of DPDK memory - look int=
=20
> rte_malloc_heap_stats related API's.
>=20

rte_malloc and friends allocate from memory pool in huge pages, not the nor=
mal
malloc heap. The mempool does have compile option for debug which does keep=
 statistics.
Then rte_mempool_dump (or rte_mempool_walk and rte_mempool_dump) can be use=
d to show info.