From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
WenjieX A Li <wenjiex.a.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Revert "app/testpmd: set fixed flag for exact link speed"
Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 22:45:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1873539.KBY3f8jFuF@xps> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190504204559.pq7SOQer-w7q-advvUC6UupG-qL4RhIWGANZGR7FgJw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2207858.tCSXyMIbcb@xps>
02/05/2019 22:27, Thomas Monjalon:
> 02/05/2019 20:31, Ferruh Yigit:
> > On 4/29/2019 10:52 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 25/04/2019 17:27, Ferruh Yigit:
> > >> On 4/25/2019 2:29 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >>> 25/04/2019 13:47, Ferruh Yigit:
> > >>>> On 4/25/2019 9:19 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >>>>> 25/04/2019 00:03, Ferruh Yigit:
> > >>>>>> This reverts commit bdca79053b6aea504d02691d9319fa976062457f.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Not all PMDs support the fixed link speed set, and link speed can be set
> > >>>>>> even with auto negotiation enabled. Reverting the patch to not break
> > >>>>>> existing usage.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Which PMDs do not support this flag?
> > >>>>> Why not fixing the PMDs?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> At least ixgbe and i40e is not supporting setting a fixed speed.
> > >>>> But I am not sure if this is something to fix, the command in testpmd is to set
> > >>>> the link speed, what is the problem with setting the link speed without
> > >>>> disabling the auto-negotiation?
> > >>>
> > >>> It means it will negotiate with only one speed proposed.
> > >>
> > >> Yes.
> > >>
> > >>> The real issue is to not support the fixed flag.
> > >>
> > >> I don't know if this is a real issue but
> > >> even it is, is it an issue in the scope of this testpmd command?
> > >>
> > >> right now we are first updating the command to set fixed speed flag, and
> > >> requesting PMDs to fix for it, I am suggesting not to update the command at all.
> > >
> > > I understand. But this change shows a broken behaviour.
> > > This is the intent of testpmd to show what works or not in PMDs.
> > > How hard is it to fix the PMDs in your opinion?
> > >
> >
> > As far as I can see the the fixed link speed set is not supported in the PMD.
> >
> > It may be easy to add perhaps, I don't know, but is it really a "broken
> > behavior" to not have this support?
> > What defines that setting speed has to be "fixed speed", if this demand is not
> > there, should testpmd enforce it?
>
> I think a PMD should support both: fixed or not.
>
> > In mail thread we have talked that this testpmd command can get an extra
> > argument to define the speed fixed or not, this can be used to test fixed speed
> > by who wants to test/use fixed speed.
> >
> > I am for reverting this for the release, and adding a new version next release
> > with fixed speed argument, otherwise testpmd won't be used to set the speed for
> > some PMDs.
>
> OK
We could have an option in testpmd to test ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED.
Revert applied.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-04 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-24 22:03 Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-24 22:03 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-25 8:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-25 8:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-25 11:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-25 11:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-25 13:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-25 13:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-25 15:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-25 15:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-29 9:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-29 9:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-02 18:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-02 18:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-02 20:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-02 20:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-04 20:45 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-05-04 20:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-06 8:09 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-05-06 8:09 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-05-07 10:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-07 10:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1873539.KBY3f8jFuF@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=wenjiex.a.li@intel.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).