From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C912A0096 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 09:46:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B41A4C93; Thu, 9 May 2019 09:46:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400E62C2B for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 09:46:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6158D21B24; Thu, 9 May 2019 03:46:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 May 2019 03:46:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=8g/OW052p0pvzfHYtB0m4IUCH2OtvBtCDnUuWZBnnVE=; b=PkXPp96m7tsL jRmzRZMubbSip5M9MgSRgNLCLmQR5yM/H5M8aDowZcNZzOMgJ+qrBqX/c/NPXlYJ 4cac3vNatAADRe3IiqXTGym8pRlxtBpAO2oueTdT4ex1hOEvM6HvOfOsdwtO9mo1 N4DdasxqqDBhOJMU3HxQvvnftb5ddYg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=8g/OW052p0pvzfHYtB0m4IUCH2OtvBtCDnUuWZBnn VE=; b=O4jfmAJnV5hH888vJ9JtelltNQlr3wCmKsnvz2GbQsQHfASyb3sDcDhye ybB6A832uTTFC3dDIhj7woejAwW3+AKzLILXcj0KugmEMls4NohTPCnHUjR5qz7x 9B/BAaV2yPJMkVc5Fn5gFLHKrom8nnJOF5dFcSsnh6v4VMXolcViuL5WtxuqM+in uS4TT6KhTzlPZ0O0KhvvuvSwlHWnk3MUFPsyRkzKDP+7+PRfRH+kFaja4gKbTxa5 H1Z0pzYJ8F6jk+0Yt0zhJrRO7pWdNZZfJnGLI3uRss5GMIZJAnnGU3sVJ7vKBq8x PXWarLMbg0OM/FhAOb5f41xBiFz+Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrkeeggdduvdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfure dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshes mhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppe ejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhm rghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 88DA7103D0; Thu, 9 May 2019 03:46:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Christensen Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 09:46:01 +0200 Message-ID: <3114423.JV8VNAVq30@xps> In-Reply-To: <17079a97-4966-fdb9-1c89-7017bc33f3a3@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1557349328-25783-1-git-send-email-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <2307873.h1T1EuVh32@xps> <17079a97-4966-fdb9-1c89-7017bc33f3a3@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] test: fix typo in print statement X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190509074601.kk2Ctq61bpRJZ0i750dZB0M-MzEkBLPW2pVYRYCrROA@z> 09/05/2019 00:50, David Christensen: > > > It seems your emails are not threaded at all. > > It makes really hard to review them. > > All patches of a patchset must be in the same thread, > > ideally with a cover letter. > > All versions of a patchset must be in the same thread, > > ideally with the cover letter v1 being the common ancestor. > > Please check http://core.dpdk.org/contribute/#send > > > > You need also to report the acks you got in previous versions. > > I messed up with the first post in the patch series (no 0/4 message). In > order to fix the long line problem, which post would you suggest I use > as an anchor for my reply-to? The original v1 1/4, the v3 1/4, or some > other? The patches of v3 are not threaded together, so when doing a v4 you can skip --in-reply-to.