From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD24A0096 for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu, 9 May 2019 21:02:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99FD44C3; Thu, 9 May 2019 21:02:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oi1-f171.google.com (mail-oi1-f171.google.com [209.85.167.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6D8A49 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 9 May 2019 21:02:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f171.google.com with SMTP id r136so2731098oie.7 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 09 May 2019 12:02:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fp4zMRlig1HzQJERKuNPKqrGy9V5oG7hkrssdpJ7qpQ=; b=hldD8ng+jddWH2ZaLg/Q7t2vVupebdH11GxIoJzdFAQ+UuwqEiFbjuTLsdQ4KuNS3i TwC7oTqOBaVMJpFAfmbmeS0uA2Z0DVvrA87MrQHlTSYw8lDIU8hE7yTpydXTOFavhb1j ygPyPkKO/XCl7K/JiJcGaKx+jcdRTUB5a1tGzct9syRx1vw4/m4luBwHa9gF+mCr0v4z Dtf/tcwD7Je/8gIjPQFgt+Zz/VtzSxoALUUsaMpQHNBhWlfZ2fO/LwHGxRl15Gp/jmrZ +g/Ofn2h5WVyIVqgJDQ1MP97vCTGOhWiTTomN//A6CeNMOA2YnbJY0yAfhXIAlzH33rg jYbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fp4zMRlig1HzQJERKuNPKqrGy9V5oG7hkrssdpJ7qpQ=; b=Oq/1dfaAeSOeeptU/vtOqQt8RXamnGdPRQumfYOmPwe/ciTf16DBLHXLHmcFqeUrtT T2YvT55ZFoHCs/Rlp8ygzRKeaofFgKx+bCJ6GKPU3kFOZxHrQIR3zo8QsQoG6W17wACT rDumjBAJzYSN/EqIrvURbgOcLs4+5lntGJK+fzw4fLogk97JTn5FHfey9nKbC5bv5u3c qQQxNGQST5D/lhNbcH5J5kRa26/BlYnKqqp/eRH5m/PW4YI6Fbj5l1EP6E3ZZj2bfqw/ RDzXl0BJeorXM7Ha3phiKlr4ObkfrYIwlG9xuhZAcWh3jKVu2e00yOHwQTy/G3w0lCpG vGiw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWgf6zZieRkDsKr4RGrP5TlmX0etdV+r7pCzV0Vu3WJ0dWcZmgB 8WiXsto0YtUm3O98i744QE0j0g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzc0tzcJTBs66BI+WGEWawBqM/VFMk1D+7Njdz8BQ87jxrwTLRbkwe66NvEdFPdQjGHCROVcA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:4c0f:: with SMTP id z15mr1548322oia.15.1557428552536; Thu, 09 May 2019 12:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13 ([167.220.103.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s124sm1133737oia.24.2019.05.09.12.02.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 May 2019 12:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 12:02:29 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> Cc: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org> Message-ID: <20190509120229.1dafb670@xps13> In-Reply-To: <dd35775d-5de0-194a-b827-3ae40ec3c554@intel.com> References: <1557355686-4216-1-git-send-email-erik.g.carrillo@intel.com> <20190509090652.GB57@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> <7a9bd784-fdf9-75a7-8a5e-f7c348112fce@intel.com> <3072107.mBd7PBc0fB@xps> <28911350-06c1-2479-8e2f-7b372d8f1df7@ashroe.eu> <dd35775d-5de0-194a-b827-3ae40ec3c554@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add deprecation notice on timer lib cleanup X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Message-ID: <20190509190229.fgjEt57UVQxmEoMzetOyKsxFGFmyht-9M86C06tY_Cs@z> On Thu, 9 May 2019 11:08:30 +0100 "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote: > >>> If the community agrees that primary/secondary processes should always > >>> use the same DPDK version (regardless of static/dynamic builds etc.), > >>> then this problem would probably be solved. > >> > >> +1 to document that primary/secondary with different DPDK versions > >> is not supported. > >> > > > > +1, > > > > but I think we need to go farther - we need a secondary process to check > > with the primary process. > > We can't assume everyone will read the documentation. > > > > That easily can be done, yes. Agree with the consensus that primary/secondary must be on the same version. Think even driver internal data structures have to be compatiable.