From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07084A00E6
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 17:21:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99D25F72;
	Thu, 16 May 2019 17:21:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com (mail-pl1-f174.google.com
 [209.85.214.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80735F62
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 17:21:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id d21so1803194plr.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 08:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=i6e/fLvBi2bsWtMXWUZvSUZWNwqHa+r7H3QPSOe2tZ4=;
 b=N4a6c1+EFtddLdx8HFDrHZhbxIxerMbBnpcmLPKZ75yJoHudzwfyenPm7y6OFotzAN
 9COBQf0vzlsF1VJuhoolmnAqDX0d1OxDVGJxd40HoQ3A9ShvECP5HnEgSItuO/dbEuCq
 1QmOi7tCJikqsoAkQmkGWr+IxO3Jq4q2WklN64FBDtYRWRJsP577w782AYQHlRL/tV6B
 b1xFNyTJx5Gm1SA8UaUt+XFYwWsC7lN+Dis2rQ/OUV2cTEnj4uS+8iPBMmj/kbS4Zutl
 lrCrl+oEGprzQ4GZRXl/ZKUTjQGU8MYdTFcc8CLZ74Zwem4NUboHeJoAA9mSvrGDWOlY
 CM6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=i6e/fLvBi2bsWtMXWUZvSUZWNwqHa+r7H3QPSOe2tZ4=;
 b=JWLpDW0hi653HoO3ZI2O+fVXGZq//nU57wh0dvDxottlJ+LwnIso2w9vAlt9fWdwZb
 Yg5AIQZLu6KyNXwaOtvmvkVPhJLsuso5HuEOxGrMdTF4wH8RTSj8u3hZwXv6JN9XF0tN
 5R7PtxMm1WdIwMp6zXCwXTVbkrWsPuZDNxhjuLsmBNrawnLfB4EB3z+QUZ+ODTYM7eB8
 bCaWboQaVansT272pe714Q6sPElRicSePR6GBtNwUH2F+jeO9Ro6aViYjc2pK7ngHk8i
 7p3y+XXD20E3tgs9djDdeZgvdDou4WahXf7xcX9Ad12FQEpU9eUW5uvlza306H7qcyba
 oRRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUZEQO+wFXuFLE17Cn+sNTcYMR2OwSAXTguv1YT1DJ77PdIGdAc
 70RZHz1qXlSJZr6nxoQEPK31cKDW0Oo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxO5RTAl0aWqJi2X5slerYMPjWO+TwXPzpjqE+v4my5ghiyPln1mIqu7aqJIMCop4PM+RPG6Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6a83:: with SMTP id
 n3mr51527665plk.109.1558020095101; 
 Thu, 16 May 2019 08:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p64sm9582592pfp.72.2019.05.16.08.21.34
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 16 May 2019 08:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 08:21:33 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Jakub Grajciar <jgrajcia@cisco.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20190516082133.5d45b8af@hermes.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20190516114658.29102-1-jgrajcia@cisco.com>
References: <20190513104552.27843-1-jgrajcia@cisco.com>
 <20190516114658.29102-1-jgrajcia@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v8] /net: memory interface (memif)
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Thu, 16 May 2019 13:46:58 +0200
Jakub Grajciar <jgrajcia@cisco.com> wrote:

> +enum memif_role_t {
> +	MEMIF_ROLE_MASTER,
> +	MEMIF_ROLE_SLAVE,
> +};

Because master/slave terminology is potentially culturally offensive it
is flagged by many corporate source scanning tools.

Could you use primary/secondary in memif instead?