From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0084A045E for ; Fri, 31 May 2019 09:51:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9B3493D; Fri, 31 May 2019 09:51:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FFF378B for ; Fri, 31 May 2019 09:51:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 May 2019 00:51:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from yexl-server.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.67.110.206]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2019 00:51:52 -0700 Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 15:43:20 +0800 From: Ye Xiaolong To: Jakub Grajciar Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20190531074320.GA44917@intel.com> References: <20190520101841.17708-1-jgrajcia@cisco.com> <20190531062247.5952-1-jgrajcia@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190531062247.5952-1-jgrajcia@cisco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] net/memif: introduce memory interface (memif) PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Minor nit, this should be a V1 instead of V10 after your RFC. On 05/31, Jakub Grajciar wrote: >Memory interface (memif), provides high performance >packet transfer over shared memory. It'd be better to have more descrition of this new PMD in the commit log, something like you have in memif.rst Thanks, Xiaolong