From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F200A04DE; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 23:42:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A704C99; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 23:42:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C1C2B88 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 23:42:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE63122106; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:42:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:42:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=f+yqaVBS50MOLHCAB5mBfrWTo5SWiaHQK4L5CBSXGeM=; b=fIrGewuykyUi AfmWcCi8MqIX97nZQwiSJGJlbd7esMF6OcUCpkjobwIg4MjLn0Ojnql/Vd5sWu9A awoNBXlHNN6ohBAXAqvqr9yR0JRNA86sx/Iry7bFJjMM7YHg5sljmjb13XADshmz 89Bs6cgZDTt8fOo9uypBCLFiKXYvwCc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=f+yqaVBS50MOLHCAB5mBfrWTo5SWiaHQK4L5CBSXG eM=; b=LHTO0tXoE1RvavZ/Bru6PAmuU/2rHlI/qUL4JPXKL3MQTrVUBjveeWBF5 VsA4elrufP6s8WQI6A6WP/4XQB4y8Od4gRC4IdicILQKEjkm5b2iOCpdufbYr3Y2 I+3XaGofNeJlhU3x+Q4qLbE9c1V5GUSLfWdQYiVx8ze68tzfKT3/jGHJQrzy2tZw bGiCpq4o+/laENH+YaN9yoEzdAP3KLEM+69H+A2o6lE6hwrpMvHT1brICg1QklvX uL0lKQ2C0tw8zQ6HHMmIIHbRrEQJg1RR44MZ6QuqMTn8+30SECY8cFJ6snyD+R+c FzKSi/aiaLdMKFpWjSu3fvYKdsr6w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudeigecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurf hrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfo ohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrg hinhepshhhsgdrtghipdguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddu keegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrd hnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7EBA580062; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:42:02 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , Michael Santana Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 23:41:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20190638.Cs85oWNEIX@xps> In-Reply-To: <20188215.cEB1Wkdlas@xps> References: <20191122155429.18971-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20188215.cEB1Wkdlas@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: add minimal check on testpmd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 24/11/2019 19:12, Thomas Monjalon: > 24/11/2019 15:17, David Marchand: > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 5:29 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > > 22/11/2019 16:54, David Marchand: > > > > --- a/.ci/linux-build.sh > > > > +++ b/.ci/linux-build.sh > > > > +if [ "$AARCH64" != "1" ]; then > > > > + ./devtools/test-null.sh > > > > > > You are missing the build directory as first parameter, > > > otherwise it won't find testpmd. > > > > This parameter is optional. > > In test-null.sh: > > build=${1:-build} # first argument can be the build directory > > > > travis builds in this directory. > > Oh right. > It's funny, because I wrote it and forgot :) > > > I suppose you noticed that the jobs in travis were all failing, but > > this is because the fix [1] on testpmd is not in master yet. > > 1: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/63226/ > > I will pull next-net soon. > > > > One nit: ./ is probably useless. > > > > No strong opinion. Applied (without ./), thanks