[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] lib/lpm: data update optimization for v1604

[Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>]

The table entries were updated field by field. There were two issues:
1. bitwise operations are read-modify-write sequences and not atomic,
   nor efficient.
2. the above non-atomic operations causes entries out of synchronization
   and inconsistency.
This patch combines the fields into a one-go 32bit entry update to avoid
inconsistency and as a bonus save CPU cycles.

Suggested-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
---
 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
index d35d64448..d86248713 100644
--- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
+++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
@@ -1035,9 +1035,14 @@ add_depth_big_v1604(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked, uint8_t depth,
 
 		/* Set tbl8 entry. */
 		for (i = tbl8_index; i < (tbl8_index + tbl8_range); i++) {
-			lpm->tbl8[i].depth = depth;
-			lpm->tbl8[i].next_hop = next_hop;
-			lpm->tbl8[i].valid = VALID;
+			struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry new_tbl8_entry = {
+				.valid = VALID,
+				.depth = depth,
+				.valid_group = lpm->tbl8[i].valid_group,
+				.next_hop = next_hop,
+			};
+			__atomic_store(&lpm->tbl8[i], &new_tbl8_entry,
+					__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -1075,19 +1080,28 @@ add_depth_big_v1604(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip_masked, uint8_t depth,
 
 		/* Populate new tbl8 with tbl24 value. */
 		for (i = tbl8_group_start; i < tbl8_group_end; i++) {
-			lpm->tbl8[i].valid = VALID;
-			lpm->tbl8[i].depth = lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].depth;
-			lpm->tbl8[i].next_hop =
-					lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].next_hop;
+			struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry new_tbl8_entry = {
+				.valid = VALID,
+				.depth = lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].depth,
+				.valid_group = lpm->tbl8[i].valid_group,
+				.next_hop = lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].next_hop,
+			};
+			__atomic_store(&lpm->tbl8[i], &new_tbl8_entry,
+					__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
 		}
 
 		tbl8_index = tbl8_group_start + (ip_masked & 0xFF);
 
 		/* Insert new rule into the tbl8 entry. */
 		for (i = tbl8_index; i < tbl8_index + tbl8_range; i++) {
-			lpm->tbl8[i].valid = VALID;
-			lpm->tbl8[i].depth = depth;
-			lpm->tbl8[i].next_hop = next_hop;
+			struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry new_tbl8_entry = {
+				.valid = VALID,
+				.depth = depth,
+				.valid_group = lpm->tbl8[i].valid_group,
+				.next_hop = next_hop,
+			};
+			__atomic_store(&lpm->tbl8[i], &new_tbl8_entry,
+					__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
 		}
 
 		/*
-- 
2.17.1