From: "Gaëtan Rivet" <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Michael Santana <msantana@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] test/eal: do not scan PCI devices for memory tests
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 15:22:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190801132201.ty75yrktxep6ei3k@bidouze.vm.6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8xFun1Xd7qLNZmKL-2TtxaCfPqaUmsNrSq_=06+vdXPDQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:29:21PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:28 PM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > The memory tests currently check that, for normal mode (not legacy mode),
> > there is no memory left behind when exiting.
> >
> > The problem is that if a ethdev port is allocated when scanning pci
> > devices (even if the driver probe fails like when you have a virtio
> > management interface attached to the kernel), on exit, dpdk won't free
> > the associated memory since ethdev never frees the ethdev memzone.
> >
> > Workaround this by disabling pci scan.
>
> Not entirely happy with this patch.
> I am open to suggestions :-)
>
Hello David,
Why not cleanup on .fini the ethdev subsystem?
There is RTE_UNREGISTER_CLASS() that was added just for that. I
think I remember someone (maybe Thomas) not liking it. Why are we
keeping the memzones allocated on exit? Debug ? Primary/secondary snafu?
I would take this opportunity to troll once again about the default
blacklist-mode of the PCI bus, which is still an issue for downstream
consumers of DPDK and seems to be kept only to avoid changing the CI
infrastructure of upstream contributors. Unfortunately the root-cause
might be elsewhere.
> >
> > Fixes: 651cc78f83b5 ("test: fix hugepage file handling in EAL flags autotest")
> > Fixes: 690fd3577e90 ("test/eal: add cases for in-memory and single-file-segments")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> And we might want to drop stable.
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
--
Gaëtan Rivet
6WIND
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-01 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-01 12:27 [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
2019-08-01 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2019-08-01 13:22 ` Gaëtan Rivet [this message]
2019-08-01 13:24 ` David Marchand
2019-08-01 13:26 ` David Marchand
2019-08-02 11:13 ` David Marchand
2019-08-02 13:37 ` Aaron Conole
2019-08-02 13:45 ` David Marchand
2019-08-02 20:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-03 9:51 ` David Marchand
2019-08-05 10:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-08 11:23 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190801132201.ty75yrktxep6ei3k@bidouze.vm.6wind.com \
--to=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=msantana@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).