DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
To: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] net/virtio: update stats when in order xmit done
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:34:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918023433.GA20995@___> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190910161446.36361-1-yong.liu@intel.com>

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:14:45AM +0800, Marvin Liu wrote:
> When doing xmit in-order enqueue, packets are buffered and then flushed
> into avail ring. Buffered packets can be dropped due to insufficient
> space. Moving stats update action just after successful avail ring
> updates can guarantee correctness.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> index 27ead19fb..d3ca36831 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,48 @@ vq_ring_free_id_packed(struct virtqueue *vq, uint16_t id)
>  	dxp->next = VQ_RING_DESC_CHAIN_END;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void
> +virtio_update_packet_stats(struct virtnet_stats *stats, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
> +{
> +	uint32_t s = mbuf->pkt_len;
> +	struct rte_ether_addr *ea;
> +
> +	stats->bytes += s;
> +
> +	if (s == 64) {
> +		stats->size_bins[1]++;
> +	} else if (s > 64 && s < 1024) {
> +		uint32_t bin;
> +
> +		/* count zeros, and offset into correct bin */
> +		bin = (sizeof(s) * 8) - __builtin_clz(s) - 5;
> +		stats->size_bins[bin]++;
> +	} else {
> +		if (s < 64)
> +			stats->size_bins[0]++;
> +		else if (s < 1519)
> +			stats->size_bins[6]++;
> +		else
> +			stats->size_bins[7]++;
> +	}
> +
> +	ea = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, struct rte_ether_addr *);
> +	if (rte_is_multicast_ether_addr(ea)) {
> +		if (rte_is_broadcast_ether_addr(ea))
> +			stats->broadcast++;
> +		else
> +			stats->multicast++;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +virtio_rx_stats_updated(struct virtnet_rx *rxvq, struct rte_mbuf *m)
> +{
> +	VIRTIO_DUMP_PACKET(m, m->data_len);
> +
> +	virtio_update_packet_stats(&rxvq->stats, m);
> +}
> +
>  static uint16_t
>  virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx_packed(struct virtqueue *vq,
>  				  struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> @@ -317,7 +359,7 @@ virtio_xmit_cleanup(struct virtqueue *vq, uint16_t num)
>  }
>  
>  /* Cleanup from completed inorder transmits. */
> -static void
> +static __rte_always_inline void
>  virtio_xmit_cleanup_inorder(struct virtqueue *vq, uint16_t num)
>  {
>  	uint16_t i, idx = vq->vq_used_cons_idx;
> @@ -596,6 +638,7 @@ virtqueue_enqueue_xmit_inorder(struct virtnet_tx *txvq,
>  		dxp = &vq->vq_descx[vq->vq_avail_idx & (vq->vq_nentries - 1)];
>  		dxp->cookie = (void *)cookies[i];
>  		dxp->ndescs = 1;
> +		virtio_update_packet_stats(&txvq->stats, cookies[i]);

The virtio_update_packet_stats() call in virtio_xmit_pkts_inorder()
should be removed.


>  
>  		hdr = (struct virtio_net_hdr *)
>  			rte_pktmbuf_prepend(cookies[i], head_size);
> @@ -1083,48 +1126,6 @@ virtio_discard_rxbuf_inorder(struct virtqueue *vq, struct rte_mbuf *m)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static inline void
> -virtio_update_packet_stats(struct virtnet_stats *stats, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
> -{
> -	uint32_t s = mbuf->pkt_len;
> -	struct rte_ether_addr *ea;
> -
> -	stats->bytes += s;
> -
> -	if (s == 64) {
> -		stats->size_bins[1]++;
> -	} else if (s > 64 && s < 1024) {
> -		uint32_t bin;
> -
> -		/* count zeros, and offset into correct bin */
> -		bin = (sizeof(s) * 8) - __builtin_clz(s) - 5;
> -		stats->size_bins[bin]++;
> -	} else {
> -		if (s < 64)
> -			stats->size_bins[0]++;
> -		else if (s < 1519)
> -			stats->size_bins[6]++;
> -		else
> -			stats->size_bins[7]++;
> -	}
> -
> -	ea = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, struct rte_ether_addr *);
> -	if (rte_is_multicast_ether_addr(ea)) {
> -		if (rte_is_broadcast_ether_addr(ea))
> -			stats->broadcast++;
> -		else
> -			stats->multicast++;
> -	}
> -}
> -
> -static inline void
> -virtio_rx_stats_updated(struct virtnet_rx *rxvq, struct rte_mbuf *m)
> -{
> -	VIRTIO_DUMP_PACKET(m, m->data_len);
> -
> -	virtio_update_packet_stats(&rxvq->stats, m);
> -}
> -
>  /* Optionally fill offload information in structure */
>  static inline int
>  virtio_rx_offload(struct rte_mbuf *m, struct virtio_net_hdr *hdr)
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-18  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-27 10:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Marvin Liu
2019-08-27 10:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/virtio: on demand cleanup when doing in order xmit Marvin Liu
2019-09-10  6:16   ` Tiwei Bie
2019-09-10  7:44     ` Liu, Yong
2019-09-10  5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/virtio: update stats when in order xmit done Tiwei Bie
2019-09-10 16:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Marvin Liu
2019-09-10 16:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/virtio: on demand cleanup when doing in order xmit Marvin Liu
2019-09-18  2:43     ` Tiwei Bie
2019-09-18  3:23       ` Liu, Yong
2019-09-18  2:34   ` Tiwei Bie [this message]
2019-09-18  3:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] net/virtio: update stats when in order xmit done Liu, Yong
2019-09-18  4:18       ` Tiwei Bie
2019-09-18 17:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Marvin Liu
2019-09-18 17:06     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] net/virtio: on demand cleanup when in order xmit Marvin Liu
2019-09-27  9:02       ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-27  9:49       ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-27  9:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] net/virtio: update stats when in order xmit done Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-27  9:49     ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190918023433.GA20995@___ \
    --to=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).