From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
To: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
Cc: "maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] net/virtio: update stats when in order xmit done
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:18:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918041809.GA26915@___> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E633A4DA3@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:19:03AM +0800, Liu, Yong wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bie, Tiwei
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 10:35 AM
> > To: Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>
> > Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net/virtio: update stats when in order xmit
> > done
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:14:45AM +0800, Marvin Liu wrote:
> > > When doing xmit in-order enqueue, packets are buffered and then flushed
> > > into avail ring. Buffered packets can be dropped due to insufficient
> > > space. Moving stats update action just after successful avail ring
> > > updates can guarantee correctness.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> > > index 27ead19fb..d3ca36831 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> > > @@ -106,6 +106,48 @@ vq_ring_free_id_packed(struct virtqueue *vq,
> > uint16_t id)
> > > dxp->next = VQ_RING_DESC_CHAIN_END;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline void
> > > +virtio_update_packet_stats(struct virtnet_stats *stats, struct rte_mbuf
> > *mbuf)
> > > +{
> > > + uint32_t s = mbuf->pkt_len;
> > > + struct rte_ether_addr *ea;
> > > +
> > > + stats->bytes += s;
> > > +
> > > + if (s == 64) {
> > > + stats->size_bins[1]++;
> > > + } else if (s > 64 && s < 1024) {
> > > + uint32_t bin;
> > > +
> > > + /* count zeros, and offset into correct bin */
> > > + bin = (sizeof(s) * 8) - __builtin_clz(s) - 5;
> > > + stats->size_bins[bin]++;
> > > + } else {
> > > + if (s < 64)
> > > + stats->size_bins[0]++;
> > > + else if (s < 1519)
> > > + stats->size_bins[6]++;
> > > + else
> > > + stats->size_bins[7]++;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ea = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, struct rte_ether_addr *);
> > > + if (rte_is_multicast_ether_addr(ea)) {
> > > + if (rte_is_broadcast_ether_addr(ea))
> > > + stats->broadcast++;
> > > + else
> > > + stats->multicast++;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void
> > > +virtio_rx_stats_updated(struct virtnet_rx *rxvq, struct rte_mbuf *m)
> > > +{
> > > + VIRTIO_DUMP_PACKET(m, m->data_len);
> > > +
> > > + virtio_update_packet_stats(&rxvq->stats, m);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static uint16_t
> > > virtqueue_dequeue_burst_rx_packed(struct virtqueue *vq,
> > > struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> > > @@ -317,7 +359,7 @@ virtio_xmit_cleanup(struct virtqueue *vq, uint16_t
> > num)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Cleanup from completed inorder transmits. */
> > > -static void
> > > +static __rte_always_inline void
> > > virtio_xmit_cleanup_inorder(struct virtqueue *vq, uint16_t num)
> > > {
> > > uint16_t i, idx = vq->vq_used_cons_idx;
> > > @@ -596,6 +638,7 @@ virtqueue_enqueue_xmit_inorder(struct virtnet_tx
> > *txvq,
> > > dxp = &vq->vq_descx[vq->vq_avail_idx & (vq->vq_nentries - 1)];
> > > dxp->cookie = (void *)cookies[i];
> > > dxp->ndescs = 1;
> > > + virtio_update_packet_stats(&txvq->stats, cookies[i]);
> >
> > The virtio_update_packet_stats() call in virtio_xmit_pkts_inorder()
> > should be removed.
> >
>
> Hi Tiwei,
> Function remained in virtio_xmit_pkts_inorder is for those packets not handled by burst enqueue function.
> Statistic of packets which handled in burst in_order enqueue function is updated in inner loop.
I mean below virtio_update_packet_stats() call in
virtio_xmit_pkts_inorder() should be removed while
doing above change:
https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/blob/master/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c#L2201
I saw above line is removed by PATCH v2 2/2, but it
should be done in this patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Marvin
>
> >
> > >
> > > hdr = (struct virtio_net_hdr *)
> > > rte_pktmbuf_prepend(cookies[i], head_size);
> > > @@ -1083,48 +1126,6 @@ virtio_discard_rxbuf_inorder(struct virtqueue *vq,
> > struct rte_mbuf *m)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static inline void
> > > -virtio_update_packet_stats(struct virtnet_stats *stats, struct rte_mbuf
> > *mbuf)
> > > -{
> > > - uint32_t s = mbuf->pkt_len;
> > > - struct rte_ether_addr *ea;
> > > -
> > > - stats->bytes += s;
> > > -
> > > - if (s == 64) {
> > > - stats->size_bins[1]++;
> > > - } else if (s > 64 && s < 1024) {
> > > - uint32_t bin;
> > > -
> > > - /* count zeros, and offset into correct bin */
> > > - bin = (sizeof(s) * 8) - __builtin_clz(s) - 5;
> > > - stats->size_bins[bin]++;
> > > - } else {
> > > - if (s < 64)
> > > - stats->size_bins[0]++;
> > > - else if (s < 1519)
> > > - stats->size_bins[6]++;
> > > - else
> > > - stats->size_bins[7]++;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - ea = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, struct rte_ether_addr *);
> > > - if (rte_is_multicast_ether_addr(ea)) {
> > > - if (rte_is_broadcast_ether_addr(ea))
> > > - stats->broadcast++;
> > > - else
> > > - stats->multicast++;
> > > - }
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static inline void
> > > -virtio_rx_stats_updated(struct virtnet_rx *rxvq, struct rte_mbuf *m)
> > > -{
> > > - VIRTIO_DUMP_PACKET(m, m->data_len);
> > > -
> > > - virtio_update_packet_stats(&rxvq->stats, m);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > /* Optionally fill offload information in structure */
> > > static inline int
> > > virtio_rx_offload(struct rte_mbuf *m, struct virtio_net_hdr *hdr)
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-18 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-27 10:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Marvin Liu
2019-08-27 10:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/virtio: on demand cleanup when doing in order xmit Marvin Liu
2019-09-10 6:16 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-09-10 7:44 ` Liu, Yong
2019-09-10 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/virtio: update stats when in order xmit done Tiwei Bie
2019-09-10 16:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Marvin Liu
2019-09-10 16:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/virtio: on demand cleanup when doing in order xmit Marvin Liu
2019-09-18 2:43 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-09-18 3:23 ` Liu, Yong
2019-09-18 2:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] net/virtio: update stats when in order xmit done Tiwei Bie
2019-09-18 3:19 ` Liu, Yong
2019-09-18 4:18 ` Tiwei Bie [this message]
2019-09-18 17:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Marvin Liu
2019-09-18 17:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] net/virtio: on demand cleanup when in order xmit Marvin Liu
2019-09-27 9:02 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-27 9:49 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-27 9:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] net/virtio: update stats when in order xmit done Maxime Coquelin
2019-09-27 9:49 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190918041809.GA26915@___ \
--to=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).