From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CBEA2EDB for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:43:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512B74CE4; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:43:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from inva020.nxp.com (inva020.nxp.com [92.121.34.13]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCD02BF7 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from inva020.nxp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inva020.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BC31A056A; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com [165.114.16.14]) by inva020.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B281A0543; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:43:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bf-netperf1.ap.freescale.net (bf-netperf1.ap.freescale.net [10.232.133.63]) by invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FF5402C1; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 19:43:39 +0800 (SGT) From: Hemant Agrawal To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: akhil.goyal@nxp.com, Hemant Agrawal Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 17:11:18 +0530 Message-Id: <20191001114119.21896-1-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/crypto: change the failure condition check X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" In some of the cases, the test is looking for a specific failure returned from the CryptoDev. Not all cryptodev support returning specific errors. This patch changes such checks to NOT-SUCCESS Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal --- app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c index 4197febb0..915acf13c 100644 --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c @@ -9410,8 +9410,8 @@ test_authentication_verify_fail_when_data_corruption( ut_params->op = process_crypto_request(ts_params->valid_devs[0], ut_params->op); TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->op, "failed crypto process"); - TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(ut_params->op->status, - RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_AUTH_FAILED, + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL(ut_params->op->status, + RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS, "authentication not failed"); ut_params->obuf = ut_params->op->sym->m_src; @@ -9471,8 +9471,8 @@ test_authentication_verify_GMAC_fail_when_corruption( ut_params->op = process_crypto_request(ts_params->valid_devs[0], ut_params->op); TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->op, "failed crypto process"); - TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(ut_params->op->status, - RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_AUTH_FAILED, + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL(ut_params->op->status, + RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS, "authentication not failed"); ut_params->obuf = ut_params->op->sym->m_src; @@ -9532,8 +9532,8 @@ test_authenticated_decryption_fail_when_corruption( ut_params->op); TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->op, "failed crypto process"); - TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(ut_params->op->status, - RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_AUTH_FAILED, + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL(ut_params->op->status, + RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS, "authentication not failed"); ut_params->obuf = ut_params->op->sym->m_src; -- 2.17.1