DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, declan.doherty@intel.com,
	akhil.goyal@nxp.com, Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/10] app/test: add aesni_mb security cpu crypto autotest
Date: Mon,  7 Oct 2019 17:28:46 +0100
Message-ID: <20191007162850.60552-7-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191007162850.60552-1-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>

This patch adds cpu crypto unit test for AESNI_MB PMD.

Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_security_cpu_crypto.c | 371 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 369 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_security_cpu_crypto.c b/app/test/test_security_cpu_crypto.c
index ca9a8dae6..a9853a0c0 100644
--- a/app/test/test_security_cpu_crypto.c
+++ b/app/test/test_security_cpu_crypto.c
@@ -19,12 +19,23 @@
 
 #include "test.h"
 #include "test_cryptodev.h"
+#include "test_cryptodev_blockcipher.h"
+#include "test_cryptodev_aes_test_vectors.h"
 #include "test_cryptodev_aead_test_vectors.h"
+#include "test_cryptodev_des_test_vectors.h"
+#include "test_cryptodev_hash_test_vectors.h"
 
 #define CPU_CRYPTO_TEST_MAX_AAD_LENGTH	16
 #define MAX_NB_SIGMENTS			4
 #define CACHE_WARM_ITER			2048
 
+#define TOP_ENC		BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_ENCRYPT
+#define TOP_DEC		BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_DECRYPT
+#define TOP_AUTH_GEN	BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_AUTH_GEN
+#define TOP_AUTH_VER	BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_AUTH_VERIFY
+#define TOP_ENC_AUTH	BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_ENC_AUTH_GEN
+#define TOP_AUTH_DEC	BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_AUTH_VERIFY_DEC
+
 enum buffer_assemble_option {
 	SGL_MAX_SEG,
 	SGL_ONE_SEG,
@@ -35,8 +46,8 @@ struct cpu_crypto_test_case {
 		uint8_t seg[MBUF_DATAPAYLOAD_SIZE];
 		uint32_t seg_len;
 	} seg_buf[MAX_NB_SIGMENTS];
-	uint8_t iv[MAXIMUM_IV_LENGTH];
-	uint8_t aad[CPU_CRYPTO_TEST_MAX_AAD_LENGTH];
+	uint8_t iv[MAXIMUM_IV_LENGTH * 2];
+	uint8_t aad[CPU_CRYPTO_TEST_MAX_AAD_LENGTH * 4];
 	uint8_t digest[DIGEST_BYTE_LENGTH_SHA512];
 } __rte_cache_aligned;
 
@@ -516,6 +527,11 @@ cpu_crypto_test_aead(const struct aead_test_data *tdata,
 	TEST_EXPAND(gcm_test_case_256_6, type)	\
 	TEST_EXPAND(gcm_test_case_256_7, type)
 
+/* test-vector/sgl-option */
+#define all_ccm_unit_test_cases \
+	TEST_EXPAND(ccm_test_case_128_1, SGL_ONE_SEG) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(ccm_test_case_128_2, SGL_ONE_SEG) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(ccm_test_case_128_3, SGL_ONE_SEG)
 
 #define TEST_EXPAND(t, o)						\
 static int								\
@@ -531,6 +547,7 @@ cpu_crypto_aead_dec_test_##t##_##o(void)				\
 
 all_gcm_unit_test_cases(SGL_ONE_SEG)
 all_gcm_unit_test_cases(SGL_MAX_SEG)
+all_ccm_unit_test_cases
 #undef TEST_EXPAND
 
 static struct unit_test_suite security_cpu_crypto_aesgcm_testsuite  = {
@@ -758,8 +775,358 @@ test_security_cpu_crypto_aesni_gcm_perf(void)
 			&security_cpu_crypto_aesgcm_perf_testsuite);
 }
 
+static struct rte_security_session *
+create_blockcipher_session(struct rte_security_ctx *ctx,
+		struct rte_mempool *sess_mp,
+		uint32_t op_mask,
+		const struct blockcipher_test_data *test_data,
+		uint32_t is_unit_test)
+{
+	struct rte_security_session_conf sess_conf = {0};
+	struct rte_crypto_sym_xform xforms[2] = { {0} };
+	struct rte_crypto_sym_xform *cipher_xform = NULL;
+	struct rte_crypto_sym_xform *auth_xform = NULL;
+	struct rte_crypto_sym_xform *xform;
+
+	if (op_mask & BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_CIPHER) {
+		cipher_xform = &xforms[0];
+		cipher_xform->type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
+
+		if (op_mask & TOP_ENC)
+			cipher_xform->cipher.op =
+				RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_ENCRYPT;
+		else
+			cipher_xform->cipher.op =
+				RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_DECRYPT;
+
+		cipher_xform->cipher.algo = test_data->crypto_algo;
+		cipher_xform->cipher.key.data = test_data->cipher_key.data;
+		cipher_xform->cipher.key.length = test_data->cipher_key.len;
+		cipher_xform->cipher.iv.offset = 0;
+		cipher_xform->cipher.iv.length = test_data->iv.len;
+
+		if (is_unit_test)
+			debug_hexdump(stdout, "cipher key:",
+					test_data->cipher_key.data,
+					test_data->cipher_key.len);
+	}
+
+	if (op_mask & BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_AUTH) {
+		auth_xform = &xforms[1];
+		auth_xform->type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
+
+		if (op_mask & TOP_AUTH_GEN)
+			auth_xform->auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_GENERATE;
+		else
+			auth_xform->auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_VERIFY;
+
+		auth_xform->auth.algo = test_data->auth_algo;
+		auth_xform->auth.key.length = test_data->auth_key.len;
+		auth_xform->auth.key.data = test_data->auth_key.data;
+		auth_xform->auth.digest_length = test_data->digest.len;
+
+		if (is_unit_test)
+			debug_hexdump(stdout, "auth key:",
+					test_data->auth_key.data,
+					test_data->auth_key.len);
+	}
+
+	if (op_mask == TOP_ENC ||
+			op_mask == TOP_DEC)
+		xform = cipher_xform;
+	else if (op_mask == TOP_AUTH_GEN ||
+			op_mask == TOP_AUTH_VER)
+		xform = auth_xform;
+	else if (op_mask == TOP_ENC_AUTH) {
+		xform = cipher_xform;
+		xform->next = auth_xform;
+	} else if (op_mask == TOP_AUTH_DEC) {
+		xform = auth_xform;
+		xform->next = cipher_xform;
+	} else
+		return NULL;
+
+	if (test_data->cipher_offset < test_data->auth_offset)
+		return NULL;
+
+	sess_conf.action_type = RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_CPU_CRYPTO;
+	sess_conf.crypto_xform = xform;
+	sess_conf.cpucrypto.cipher_offset = test_data->cipher_offset -
+			test_data->auth_offset;
+
+	return rte_security_session_create(ctx, &sess_conf, sess_mp);
+}
+
+static inline int
+assemble_blockcipher_buf(struct cpu_crypto_test_case *data,
+		struct cpu_crypto_test_obj *obj,
+		uint32_t obj_idx,
+		uint32_t op_mask,
+		const struct blockcipher_test_data *test_data,
+		uint32_t is_unit_test)
+{
+	const uint8_t *src;
+	uint32_t src_len;
+	uint32_t offset;
+
+	if (op_mask == TOP_ENC_AUTH ||
+			op_mask == TOP_AUTH_GEN ||
+			op_mask == BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_AUTH_VERIFY)
+		offset = test_data->auth_offset;
+	else
+		offset = test_data->cipher_offset;
+
+	if (op_mask & TOP_ENC_AUTH) {
+		src = test_data->plaintext.data;
+		src_len = test_data->plaintext.len;
+		if (is_unit_test)
+			debug_hexdump(stdout, "plaintext:", src, src_len);
+	} else {
+		src = test_data->ciphertext.data;
+		src_len = test_data->ciphertext.len;
+		memcpy(data->digest, test_data->digest.data,
+				test_data->digest.len);
+		if (is_unit_test) {
+			debug_hexdump(stdout, "ciphertext:", src, src_len);
+			debug_hexdump(stdout, "digest:", test_data->digest.data,
+					test_data->digest.len);
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (src_len > MBUF_DATAPAYLOAD_SIZE)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	memcpy(data->seg_buf[0].seg, src, src_len);
+	data->seg_buf[0].seg_len = src_len;
+	obj->vec[obj_idx][0].iov_base =
+			(void *)(data->seg_buf[0].seg + offset);
+	obj->vec[obj_idx][0].iov_len = src_len - offset;
+
+	obj->sec_buf[obj_idx].vec = obj->vec[obj_idx];
+	obj->sec_buf[obj_idx].num = 1;
+
+	memcpy(data->iv, test_data->iv.data, test_data->iv.len);
+	if (is_unit_test)
+		debug_hexdump(stdout, "iv:", test_data->iv.data,
+				test_data->iv.len);
+
+	obj->iv[obj_idx] = (void *)data->iv;
+	obj->digest[obj_idx] = (void *)data->digest;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+check_blockcipher_result(struct cpu_crypto_test_case *tcase,
+		uint32_t op_mask,
+		const struct blockcipher_test_data *test_data)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (op_mask & BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_CIPHER) {
+		const char *err_msg1, *err_msg2;
+		const uint8_t *src_pt_ct;
+		uint32_t src_len;
+
+		if (op_mask & TOP_ENC) {
+			src_pt_ct = test_data->ciphertext.data;
+			src_len = test_data->ciphertext.len;
+			err_msg1 = CPU_CRYPTO_ERR_EXP_CT;
+			err_msg2 = CPU_CRYPTO_ERR_GEN_CT;
+		} else {
+			src_pt_ct = test_data->plaintext.data;
+			src_len = test_data->plaintext.len;
+			err_msg1 = CPU_CRYPTO_ERR_EXP_PT;
+			err_msg2 = CPU_CRYPTO_ERR_GEN_PT;
+		}
+
+		ret = memcmp(tcase->seg_buf[0].seg, src_pt_ct, src_len);
+		if (ret != 0) {
+			debug_hexdump(stdout, err_msg1, src_pt_ct, src_len);
+			debug_hexdump(stdout, err_msg2,
+					tcase->seg_buf[0].seg,
+					test_data->ciphertext.len);
+			return -1;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (op_mask & TOP_AUTH_GEN) {
+		ret = memcmp(tcase->digest, test_data->digest.data,
+				test_data->digest.len);
+		if (ret != 0) {
+			debug_hexdump(stdout, "expect digest:",
+					test_data->digest.data,
+					test_data->digest.len);
+			debug_hexdump(stdout, "gen digest:",
+					tcase->digest,
+					test_data->digest.len);
+			return -1;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+cpu_crypto_test_blockcipher(const struct blockcipher_test_data *tdata,
+		uint32_t op_mask)
+{
+	struct cpu_crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
+	struct cpu_crypto_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
+	struct cpu_crypto_test_obj *obj = &ut_params->test_obj;
+	struct cpu_crypto_test_case *tcase;
+	int ret;
+
+	ut_params->sess = create_blockcipher_session(ts_params->ctx,
+			ts_params->session_priv_mpool,
+			op_mask,
+			tdata,
+			1);
+	if (!ut_params->sess)
+		return -1;
+
+	ret = allocate_buf(1);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	tcase = ut_params->test_datas[0];
+	ret = assemble_blockcipher_buf(tcase, obj, 0, op_mask, tdata, 1);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		printf("Test is not supported by the driver\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	run_test(ts_params->ctx, ut_params->sess, obj, 1);
+
+	ret = check_status(obj, 1);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = check_blockcipher_result(tcase, op_mask, tdata);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Macro to save code for defining BlockCipher test cases */
+/* test-vector-name/op */
+#define all_blockcipher_test_cases \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_1, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_1, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_1, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_1, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_2, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_2, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_2, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_2, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_3, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_3, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_3, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_3, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_4, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_4, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_4, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_4, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_5, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_5, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_5, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_5, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_6, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_6, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_6, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_6, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_7, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_7, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_7, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_7, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_8, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_8, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_8, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_8, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_9, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_9, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_9, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_9, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_10, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_10, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_11, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_11, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_12, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_12, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_12, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_12, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_13, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_13, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_13, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(aes_test_data_13, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(des_test_data_1, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(des_test_data_1, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(des_test_data_2, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(des_test_data_2, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(des_test_data_3, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(des_test_data_3, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(triple_des128cbc_hmac_sha1_test_vector, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(triple_des128cbc_hmac_sha1_test_vector, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(triple_des128cbc_hmac_sha1_test_vector, TOP_ENC_AUTH) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(triple_des128cbc_hmac_sha1_test_vector, TOP_AUTH_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(triple_des64cbc_test_vector, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(triple_des64cbc_test_vector, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(triple_des128cbc_test_vector, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(triple_des128cbc_test_vector, TOP_DEC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(triple_des192cbc_test_vector, TOP_ENC) \
+	TEST_EXPAND(triple_des192cbc_test_vector, TOP_DEC) \
+
+#define TEST_EXPAND(t, o)						\
+static int								\
+cpu_crypto_blockcipher_test_##t##_##o(void)				\
+{									\
+	return cpu_crypto_test_blockcipher(&t, o);			\
+}
+
+all_blockcipher_test_cases
+#undef TEST_EXPAND
+
+static struct unit_test_suite security_cpu_crypto_aesni_mb_testsuite  = {
+	.suite_name = "Security CPU Crypto AESNI-MB Unit Test Suite",
+	.setup = testsuite_setup,
+	.teardown = testsuite_teardown,
+	.unit_test_cases = {
+#define TEST_EXPAND(t, o)						\
+	TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,				\
+			cpu_crypto_aead_enc_test_##t##_##o),		\
+	TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,				\
+			cpu_crypto_aead_dec_test_##t##_##o),		\
+
+	all_gcm_unit_test_cases(SGL_ONE_SEG)
+	all_ccm_unit_test_cases
+#undef TEST_EXPAND
+
+#define TEST_EXPAND(t, o)						\
+	TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,				\
+			cpu_crypto_blockcipher_test_##t##_##o),		\
+
+	all_blockcipher_test_cases
+#undef TEST_EXPAND
+
+	TEST_CASES_END() /**< NULL terminate unit test array */
+	},
+};
+
+static int
+test_security_cpu_crypto_aesni_mb(void)
+{
+	gbl_driver_id =	rte_cryptodev_driver_id_get(
+			RTE_STR(CRYPTODEV_NAME_AESNI_MB_PMD));
+
+	return unit_test_suite_runner(&security_cpu_crypto_aesni_mb_testsuite);
+}
+
 REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(security_aesni_gcm_autotest,
 		test_security_cpu_crypto_aesni_gcm);
 
 REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(security_aesni_gcm_perftest,
 		test_security_cpu_crypto_aesni_gcm_perf);
+
+REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(security_aesni_mb_autotest,
+		test_security_cpu_crypto_aesni_mb);
-- 
2.14.5


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-03 15:40 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/9] security: add software synchronous crypto process Fan Zhang
2019-09-03 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/9] security: introduce CPU Crypto action type and API Fan Zhang
2019-09-04 10:32   ` Akhil Goyal
2019-09-04 13:06     ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2019-09-06  9:01       ` Akhil Goyal
2019-09-06 13:12         ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2019-09-10 11:25           ` Akhil Goyal
2019-09-11 13:01             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-06 13:27         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-10 10:44           ` Akhil Goyal
2019-09-11 12:29             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-12 14:12               ` Akhil Goyal
2019-09-16 14:53                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-16 15:08                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-17  6:02                   ` Akhil Goyal
2019-09-18  7:44                     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-25 18:24                       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-27  9:26                         ` Akhil Goyal
2019-09-30 12:22                           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-30 13:43                             ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-01 14:49                               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 13:24                                 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-07 12:53                                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-09  7:20                                     ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-09 13:43                                       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 13:23                                         ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-13 23:07                                           ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2019-10-14 11:10                                             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-15 15:02                                               ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-16 13:04                                                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-15 15:00                                             ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-16 22:07                                           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-17 12:49                                             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-18 13:17                                             ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-21 13:47                                               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-22 13:31                                                 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-22 17:44                                                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-22 22:21                                                     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-23 10:05                                                     ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-30 14:23                                                       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-11-01 13:53                                                         ` Akhil Goyal
2019-09-03 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/9] crypto/aesni_gcm: add rte_security handler Fan Zhang
2019-09-03 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/9] app/test: add security cpu crypto autotest Fan Zhang
2019-09-03 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 4/9] app/test: add security cpu crypto perftest Fan Zhang
2019-09-03 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 5/9] crypto/aesni_mb: add rte_security handler Fan Zhang
2019-09-03 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 6/9] app/test: add aesni_mb security cpu crypto autotest Fan Zhang
2019-09-03 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 7/9] app/test: add aesni_mb security cpu crypto perftest Fan Zhang
2019-09-03 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 8/9] ipsec: add rte_security cpu_crypto action support Fan Zhang
2019-09-03 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 9/9] examples/ipsec-secgw: add security " Fan Zhang
2019-09-06 13:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] security: add software synchronous crypto process Fan Zhang
2019-09-06 13:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/10] security: introduce CPU Crypto action type and API Fan Zhang
2019-09-18 12:45     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-29  6:00     ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-09-29 16:59       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-30  9:43         ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-01 15:27           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-02  2:47             ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-09-06 13:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/10] crypto/aesni_gcm: add rte_security handler Fan Zhang
2019-09-18 10:24     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-06 13:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/10] app/test: add security cpu crypto autotest Fan Zhang
2019-09-06 13:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/10] app/test: add security cpu crypto perftest Fan Zhang
2019-09-06 13:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/10] crypto/aesni_mb: add rte_security handler Fan Zhang
2019-09-18 15:20     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-06 13:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/10] app/test: add aesni_mb security cpu crypto autotest Fan Zhang
2019-09-06 13:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/10] app/test: add aesni_mb security cpu crypto perftest Fan Zhang
2019-09-06 13:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/10] ipsec: add rte_security cpu_crypto action support Fan Zhang
2019-09-26 23:20     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-27 10:38     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-09-06 13:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/10] examples/ipsec-secgw: add security " Fan Zhang
2019-09-06 13:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/10] doc: update security cpu process description Fan Zhang
2019-09-09 12:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] security: add software synchronous crypto process Aaron Conole
2019-10-07 16:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Fan Zhang
2019-10-07 16:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/10] security: introduce CPU Crypto action type and API Fan Zhang
2019-10-08 13:42       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-07 16:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 02/10] crypto/aesni_gcm: add rte_security handler Fan Zhang
2019-10-08 13:44       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-07 16:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 03/10] app/test: add security cpu crypto autotest Fan Zhang
2019-10-07 16:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/10] app/test: add security cpu crypto perftest Fan Zhang
2019-10-07 16:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/10] crypto/aesni_mb: add rte_security handler Fan Zhang
2019-10-08 16:23       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-09  8:29       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-07 16:28     ` Fan Zhang [this message]
2019-10-07 16:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/10] app/test: add aesni_mb security cpu crypto perftest Fan Zhang
2019-10-07 16:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 08/10] ipsec: add rte_security cpu_crypto action support Fan Zhang
2019-10-08 23:28       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-07 16:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/10] examples/ipsec-secgw: add security " Fan Zhang
2019-10-07 16:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/10] doc: update security cpu process description Fan Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191007162850.60552-7-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --to=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox