From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 RESEND] timer: remove check_tsc_flags()
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:36:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191008083649.GA1856@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191007161854.0d4bbad0@hermes.lan>
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:18:54PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 08:40:05 -0700 Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This code was added 7+ years ago:
> >
> > commit fb022b85bae4 ("timer: check TSC reliability")
> >
> > presumably when variant TSCs were still somewhat common? But this code
> > doesn't do anything except print a warning, and the warning doesn't
> > give any kind of advice to the user, so let's just remove it.
> >
> > While the warning has no functional meaning, the /proc/cpuinfo parsing
> > consumes a non-trivial amount of time which is especially noticeable in
> > secondary processes. On my test system, it consumes 21ms out of the
> > 66ms total execution time for rte_eal_init() in a secondary process.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
>
> Yes this code is dead.
>
> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>
+1 for this. Even if it was needed, we should never parse /proc/cpuinfo,
since we have a DPDK function to query cpuid directly anyway.
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-08 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-21 10:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jim Harris
2019-10-07 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 RESEND] " Jim Harris
2019-10-07 23:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-08 8:36 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2019-10-08 15:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-18 4:10 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191008083649.GA1856@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=james.r.harris@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).