DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Andrzej Ostruszka <amo@semihalf.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Improve function versioning meson support
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:59:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191009155903.62c55d42@hermes.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190927194932.22197-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 20:49:30 +0100
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> Adding support for LTO has exposed some issues with how the functions
> versioning was supported by meson, which was always set to build both
> shared and static libraries.
> 
> For plain C code, so long as the -fPIC compiler flag was passed, the
> output is identical whether or not the code is to be included in a
> static library or a dynamic one. Unfortunately, when using function
> versioning that no longer held as different macros were used for the
> versioned functions depending on which type of build it was. This means
> that any files that use versioning need to be built twice, with
> different defines in each case.
> 
> While the trivial solution here is just to rebuild everything twice,
> that involves a lot of unnecessary work when building DPDK. A better
> option is to identify those files or components which need multiple
> builds and rebuild only those. To do this, we add a new meson.build
> setting for libraries "use_function_versioning" and when that is set, we
> rebuild all source files twice, initially for static library and then
> with -DRTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB for the shared library.
> 
> If the flag is not set, then the static versioning setting only is used,
> which could lead to the build succeeding but later causing problems. To
> avoid that, we add a new define which must be set when the versioning
> header is included. This addition while solving 1 problem raises 2
> other, more minor problems:
> * what to do with make builds? since make only builds one library type,
>   we can just always define the new value.
> * what about files that include rte_compat.h for the macro for
>   "experimental"? To solve this, we can split compat.h in two, since the
>   versioning macro should be internal only to DPDK (as no public header
>   should expose anything but the latest APIs), while the experimental
>   macros are primarily for public use.
> 
> Bruce Richardson (2):
>   eal: split compat header file
>   build: support building ABI versioned files twice
> 
>  config/common_base                            |  1 +
>  config/rte_config.h                           |  3 ---
>  doc/api/doxy-api-index.md                     |  3 ++-
>  doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst      |  7 ++++++
>  doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst        |  4 ++--
>  lib/librte_distributor/meson.build            |  1 +
>  lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c      |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_v20.c  |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/Makefile                |  1 +
>  ...rte_compat.h => rte_function_versioning.h} | 23 ++++++-------------
>  lib/librte_lpm/meson.build                    |  1 +
>  lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c                      |  1 +
>  lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h                      |  1 -
>  lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm6.c                     |  1 +
>  lib/librte_timer/meson.build                  |  1 +
>  lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c                  |  2 +-
>  lib/meson.build                               | 16 ++++++++++---
>  17 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>  rename lib/librte_eal/common/include/{rte_compat.h => rte_function_versioning.h} (89%)
> 

Looks fine.
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-27 19:49 Bruce Richardson
2019-09-27 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: split compat header file Bruce Richardson
2019-09-27 20:48   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-09-27 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] build: support building ABI versioned files twice Bruce Richardson
2019-09-27 20:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Improve function versioning meson support Bruce Richardson
2019-09-27 20:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: split compat header file Bruce Richardson
2019-09-27 20:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] build: support building ABI versioned files twice Bruce Richardson
2019-10-01 13:23     ` Andrzej Ostruszka
2019-10-01 16:53       ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-07 15:57         ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-07 15:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Improve function versioning meson support Bruce Richardson
2019-10-07 15:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: split compat header file Bruce Richardson
2019-10-27  9:49     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-10-07 15:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] build: support building ABI versioned files twice Bruce Richardson
2019-10-23 10:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Improve function versioning meson support Andrzej Ostruszka
2019-10-27 10:26     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-10-09 22:59 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191009155903.62c55d42@hermes.lan \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=amo@semihalf.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).