* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] mbuf: add bulk free function @ 2019-10-11 12:14 Morten Brørup 2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] " Morten Brørup 2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions Morten Brørup 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Morten Brørup @ 2019-10-11 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev Cc: olivier.matz, stephen, harry.van.haaren, konstantin.ananyev, mattias.ronnblom, bruce.richardson, arybchenko, Morten Brørup Add function for freeing a bulk of mbufs. Add unit test for functions for allocating and freeing a bulk of mbufs. --- v8: * Add unit test, covering both bulk alloc and bulk free. v7: * Squash multiple modifications into one. v6: * Remove __rte_always_inline from static function. The compiler will inline anyway. v5: * Rename variables from "free" to "pending" for improved readability. * Add prefix __ to rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(). * Add array size parameter to __rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(). The compiler will optimize the parameter away anyway. * Add description to __rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(). * Minor description updates. v4: * Mark as experimental by adding __rte_experimental. * Add function to experimental section of map file. * Fix source code formatting regarding pointer to pointer. * Squash multiple modifications into one. v3: * Bugfix: Handle pakets with multiple segments. * Add inline helper function, mainly for readability. * Fix source code formatting regarding indentation. v2: * Function is not inline. * Optimize to free multible mbufs belonging to the same mempool in bulk. Inspired by ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(), but allowing NULL pointers in the array, just like rte_pktmbuf_free() can take a NULL pointer. * Use unsigned int instead of unsigned. Passes checkpatch, but mismatches the original coding style of the modified files. * Fix a typo in the description headline: mempools is plural. Morten Brørup (2): mbuf: add bulk free function mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions app/test/test_mbuf.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 66 +++++++++++ lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 15 +++ lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map | 1 + 4 files changed, 253 insertions(+) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] mbuf: add bulk free function 2019-10-11 12:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] mbuf: add bulk free function Morten Brørup @ 2019-10-11 12:14 ` Morten Brørup 2019-10-16 7:35 ` Olivier Matz 2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions Morten Brørup 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Morten Brørup @ 2019-10-11 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev Cc: olivier.matz, stephen, harry.van.haaren, konstantin.ananyev, mattias.ronnblom, bruce.richardson, arybchenko, Morten Brørup Add function for freeing a bulk of mbufs. Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> --- v8: * Add unit test, covering both bulk alloc and bulk free. v7: * Squash multiple modifications into one. v6: * Remove __rte_always_inline from static function. The compiler will inline anyway. v5: * Rename variables from "free" to "pending" for improved readability. * Add prefix __ to rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(). * Add array size parameter to __rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(). The compiler will optimize the parameter away anyway. * Add description to __rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(). * Minor description updates. v4: * Mark as experimental by adding __rte_experimental. * Add function to experimental section of map file. * Fix source code formatting regarding pointer to pointer. * Squash multiple modifications into one. v3: * Bugfix: Handle pakets with multiple segments. * Add inline helper function, mainly for readability. * Fix source code formatting regarding indentation. v2: * Function is not inline. * Optimize to free multible mbufs belonging to the same mempool in bulk. Inspired by ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(), but allowing NULL pointers in the array, just like rte_pktmbuf_free() can take a NULL pointer. * Use unsigned int instead of unsigned. Passes checkpatch, but mismatches the original coding style of the modified files. * Fix a typo in the description headline: mempools is plural. --- lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 15 +++++++ lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map | 1 + 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c index 37718d49c..854af1104 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c @@ -245,6 +245,72 @@ int rte_mbuf_check(const struct rte_mbuf *m, int is_header, return 0; } +/** + * @internal helper function for freeing a bulk of packet mbuf segments + * via an array holding the packet mbuf segments from the same mempool + * pending to be freed. + * + * @param m + * The packet mbuf segment to be freed. + * @param pending + * Pointer to the array of packet mbuf segments pending to be freed. + * @param nb_pending + * Pointer to the number of elements held in the array. + * @param pending_sz + * Number of elements the array can hold. + * Note: The compiler should optimize this parameter away when using a + * constant value, such as RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_PENDING_SZ. + */ +static void +__rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(struct rte_mbuf *m, + struct rte_mbuf ** const pending, unsigned int * const nb_pending, + const unsigned int pending_sz) +{ + m = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(m); + if (likely(m != NULL)) { + if (*nb_pending == pending_sz || + (*nb_pending > 0 && m->pool != pending[0]->pool)) { + rte_mempool_put_bulk(pending[0]->pool, + (void **)pending, *nb_pending); + *nb_pending = 0; + } + + pending[(*nb_pending)++] = m; + } +} + +/** + * Size of the array holding mbufs from the same membool pending to be freed + * in bulk. + */ +#define RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_PENDING_SZ 64 + +/* Free a bulk of packet mbufs back into their original mempools. */ +void rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned int count) +{ + struct rte_mbuf *m, *m_next, *pending[RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_PENDING_SZ]; + unsigned int idx, nb_pending = 0; + + for (idx = 0; idx < count; idx++) { + m = mbufs[idx]; + if (unlikely(m == NULL)) + continue; + + __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 1); + + do { + m_next = m->next; + __rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(m, + pending, &nb_pending, + RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_PENDING_SZ); + m = m_next; + } while (m != NULL); + } + + if (nb_pending > 0) + rte_mempool_put_bulk(pending[0]->pool, (void **)pending, nb_pending); +} + /* dump a mbuf on console */ void rte_pktmbuf_dump(FILE *f, const struct rte_mbuf *m, unsigned dump_len) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h index 98225ec80..a02c8b12c 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h @@ -1907,6 +1907,21 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_free(struct rte_mbuf *m) } } +/** + * Free a bulk of packet mbufs back into their original mempools. + * + * Free a bulk of mbufs, and all their segments in case of chained buffers. + * Each segment is added back into its original mempool. + * + * @param mbufs + * Array of pointers to packet mbufs. + * The array may contain NULL pointers. + * @param count + * Array size. + */ +__rte_experimental +void rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned int count); + /** * Creates a "clone" of the given packet mbuf. * diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map index 2662a37bf..cd6154ef2 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map @@ -50,4 +50,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL { global: rte_mbuf_check; + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk; } DPDK_18.08; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] mbuf: add bulk free function 2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] " Morten Brørup @ 2019-10-16 7:35 ` Olivier Matz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Olivier Matz @ 2019-10-16 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Morten Brørup Cc: dev, stephen, harry.van.haaren, konstantin.ananyev, mattias.ronnblom, bruce.richardson, arybchenko Hi, On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:14:57PM +0000, Morten Brørup wrote: > Add function for freeing a bulk of mbufs. > > Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> [...] > +/** > + * Size of the array holding mbufs from the same membool pending to be freed > + * in bulk. > + */ Minor typo: membool -> mempool Apart from that, Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions 2019-10-11 12:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] mbuf: add bulk free function Morten Brørup 2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] " Morten Brørup @ 2019-10-11 12:14 ` Morten Brørup 2019-10-16 7:54 ` Olivier Matz 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Morten Brørup @ 2019-10-11 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev Cc: olivier.matz, stephen, harry.van.haaren, konstantin.ananyev, mattias.ronnblom, bruce.richardson, arybchenko, Morten Brørup Add unit test for functions for allocating and freeing a bulk of mbufs. Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> --- app/test/test_mbuf.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 171 insertions(+) diff --git a/app/test/test_mbuf.c b/app/test/test_mbuf.c index 2a97afe20..fbce0ca7c 100644 --- a/app/test/test_mbuf.c +++ b/app/test/test_mbuf.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include <sys/queue.h> #include <rte_common.h> +#include <rte_errno.h> #include <rte_debug.h> #include <rte_log.h> #include <rte_memory.h> @@ -545,6 +546,170 @@ test_pktmbuf_pool(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool) return ret; } +/* + * test bulk allocation and bulk free of mbufs + */ +static int +test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk(void) +{ + struct rte_mempool *pool = NULL; + struct rte_mempool *pool2 = NULL; + unsigned int i; + struct rte_mbuf *m; + struct rte_mbuf *mbufs[NB_MBUF]; + int ret = 0; + + /* We cannot use the preallocated mbuf pools because their caches + * prevent us from bulk allocating all objects in them. + * So we create our own mbuf pools without caches. + */ + printf("Create mbuf pools for bulk allocation.\n"); + pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("test_pktmbuf_bulk", + NB_MBUF, 0, 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY); + if (pool == NULL) { + printf("rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() failed. rte_errno %d\n", + rte_errno); + goto err; + } + pool2 = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("test_pktmbuf_bulk2", + NB_MBUF, 0, 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY); + if (pool2 == NULL) { + printf("rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() failed. rte_errno %d\n", + rte_errno); + goto err; + } + + /* Preconditions: Mempools must be full. */ + if (!(rte_mempool_full(pool) && rte_mempool_full(pool2))) { + printf("Test precondition failed: mempools not full\n"); + goto err; + } + if (!(rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) == NB_MBUF && + rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2) == NB_MBUF)) { + printf("Test precondition failed: mempools: %u+%u != %u+%u", + rte_mempool_avail_count(pool), + rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2), + NB_MBUF, NB_MBUF); + goto err; + } + + printf("Test single bulk alloc, followed by multiple bulk free.\n"); + + /* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in one go. */ + ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, mbufs, NB_MBUF); + if (ret != 0) { + printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret); + goto err; + } + /* Test that they have been removed from the pool. */ + if (!rte_mempool_empty(pool)) { + printf("mempool not empty\n"); + goto err; + } + /* Bulk free all mbufs, in four steps. */ + for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF; i += NB_MBUF / 4) { + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&mbufs[i], NB_MBUF / 4); + /* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */ + if (rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) != i + NB_MBUF / 4) { + printf("mempool avail count incorrect\n"); + goto err; + } + } + + printf("Test multiple bulk alloc, followed by single bulk free.\n"); + + /* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in four steps. */ + for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF; i += NB_MBUF / 4) { + ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, &mbufs[i], NB_MBUF / 4); + if (ret != 0) { + printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret); + goto err; + } + } + /* Test that they have been removed from the pool. */ + if (!rte_mempool_empty(pool)) { + printf("mempool not empty\n"); + goto err; + } + /* Bulk free all mbufs, in one go. */ + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, NB_MBUF); + /* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */ + if (!rte_mempool_full(pool)) { + printf("mempool not full\n"); + goto err; + } + + printf("Test bulk free of single long chain.\n"); + + /* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in one go. */ + ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, mbufs, NB_MBUF); + if (ret != 0) { + printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret); + goto err; + } + /* Create a long mbuf chain. */ + for (i = 1; i < NB_MBUF; i++) { + ret = rte_pktmbuf_chain(mbufs[0], mbufs[i]); + if (ret != 0) { + printf("rte_pktmbuf_chain() failed: %d\n", ret); + goto err; + } + mbufs[i] = NULL; + } + /* Free the mbuf chain containing all the mbufs. */ + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, 1); + /* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */ + if (!rte_mempool_full(pool)) { + printf("mempool not full\n"); + goto err; + } + + printf("Test bulk free of multiple chains using multiple pools.\n"); + + /* Create mbuf chains containing mbufs from different pools. */ + for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF * 2; i++) { + m = rte_pktmbuf_alloc((i & 4) ? pool2 : pool); + if (m == NULL) { + printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc() failed (%u)\n", i); + goto err; + } + if ((i % 16) == 0) { + mbufs[i / 16] = m; + } else { + rte_pktmbuf_chain(mbufs[i / 16], m); + } + } + /* Test that both pools have been emptied. */ + if (!(rte_mempool_empty(pool) && rte_mempool_empty(pool2))) { + printf("mempools not empty\n"); + goto err; + } + /* Free one mbuf chain. */ + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, 1); + /* Test that the segments have been returned to the pools. */ + if (!(rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) == 8 && + rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2) == 8)) { + printf("all segments of first mbuf have not been returned\n"); + goto err; + } + /* Free the remaining mbuf chains. */ + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&mbufs[1], NB_MBUF * 2 / 16 - 1); + /* Test that they have been returned to the pools. */ + if (!(rte_mempool_full(pool) && rte_mempool_full(pool2))) { + printf("mempools not full\n"); + goto err; + } + + rte_mempool_free(pool); + rte_mempool_free(pool2); + return 0; + +err: + rte_mempool_free(pool); + rte_mempool_free(pool2); + return -1; +} + /* * test that the pointer to the data on a packet mbuf is set properly */ @@ -1162,6 +1327,12 @@ test_mbuf(void) goto err; } + /* test bulk mbuf alloc and free */ + if (test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk() < 0) { + printf("test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk() failed\n"); + goto err; + } + /* test that the pointer to the data on a packet mbuf is set properly */ if (test_pktmbuf_pool_ptr(pktmbuf_pool) < 0) { printf("test_pktmbuf_pool_ptr() failed\n"); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions 2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions Morten Brørup @ 2019-10-16 7:54 ` Olivier Matz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Olivier Matz @ 2019-10-16 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Morten Brørup Cc: dev, stephen, harry.van.haaren, konstantin.ananyev, mattias.ronnblom, bruce.richardson, arybchenko Hi Morten, On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:14:58PM +0000, Morten Brørup wrote: > Add unit test for functions for allocating and freeing a bulk of mbufs. > > Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> Few minor comments below. You can add my ack in the next version. > --- > app/test/test_mbuf.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 171 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/app/test/test_mbuf.c b/app/test/test_mbuf.c > index 2a97afe20..fbce0ca7c 100644 > --- a/app/test/test_mbuf.c > +++ b/app/test/test_mbuf.c > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > #include <sys/queue.h> > > #include <rte_common.h> > +#include <rte_errno.h> > #include <rte_debug.h> > #include <rte_log.h> > #include <rte_memory.h> > @@ -545,6 +546,170 @@ test_pktmbuf_pool(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool) > return ret; > } > > +/* > + * test bulk allocation and bulk free of mbufs > + */ > +static int > +test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk(void) > +{ > + struct rte_mempool *pool = NULL; > + struct rte_mempool *pool2 = NULL; > + unsigned int i; > + struct rte_mbuf *m; > + struct rte_mbuf *mbufs[NB_MBUF]; > + int ret = 0; > + > + /* We cannot use the preallocated mbuf pools because their caches > + * prevent us from bulk allocating all objects in them. > + * So we create our own mbuf pools without caches. > + */ > + printf("Create mbuf pools for bulk allocation.\n"); > + pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("test_pktmbuf_bulk", > + NB_MBUF, 0, 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY); > + if (pool == NULL) { > + printf("rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() failed. rte_errno %d\n", > + rte_errno); > + goto err; > + } > + pool2 = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("test_pktmbuf_bulk2", > + NB_MBUF, 0, 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY); > + if (pool2 == NULL) { > + printf("rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() failed. rte_errno %d\n", > + rte_errno); > + goto err; > + } > + > + /* Preconditions: Mempools must be full. */ > + if (!(rte_mempool_full(pool) && rte_mempool_full(pool2))) { > + printf("Test precondition failed: mempools not full\n"); > + goto err; > + } > + if (!(rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) == NB_MBUF && > + rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2) == NB_MBUF)) { > + printf("Test precondition failed: mempools: %u+%u != %u+%u", > + rte_mempool_avail_count(pool), > + rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2), > + NB_MBUF, NB_MBUF); > + goto err; > + } > + > + printf("Test single bulk alloc, followed by multiple bulk free.\n"); > + > + /* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in one go. */ > + ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, mbufs, NB_MBUF); > + if (ret != 0) { > + printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret); > + goto err; > + } > + /* Test that they have been removed from the pool. */ > + if (!rte_mempool_empty(pool)) { > + printf("mempool not empty\n"); > + goto err; > + } > + /* Bulk free all mbufs, in four steps. */ > + for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF; i += NB_MBUF / 4) { Maybe add a RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(NB_MBUF % 4 == 0) > + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&mbufs[i], NB_MBUF / 4); > + /* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */ > + if (rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) != i + NB_MBUF / 4) { > + printf("mempool avail count incorrect\n"); > + goto err; > + } > + } > + > + printf("Test multiple bulk alloc, followed by single bulk free.\n"); > + > + /* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in four steps. */ > + for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF; i += NB_MBUF / 4) { > + ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, &mbufs[i], NB_MBUF / 4); > + if (ret != 0) { > + printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret); > + goto err; > + } > + } > + /* Test that they have been removed from the pool. */ > + if (!rte_mempool_empty(pool)) { > + printf("mempool not empty\n"); > + goto err; > + } > + /* Bulk free all mbufs, in one go. */ > + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, NB_MBUF); > + /* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */ > + if (!rte_mempool_full(pool)) { > + printf("mempool not full\n"); > + goto err; > + } > + > + printf("Test bulk free of single long chain.\n"); > + > + /* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in one go. */ > + ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, mbufs, NB_MBUF); > + if (ret != 0) { > + printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret); > + goto err; > + } > + /* Create a long mbuf chain. */ > + for (i = 1; i < NB_MBUF; i++) { > + ret = rte_pktmbuf_chain(mbufs[0], mbufs[i]); > + if (ret != 0) { > + printf("rte_pktmbuf_chain() failed: %d\n", ret); > + goto err; > + } > + mbufs[i] = NULL; > + } > + /* Free the mbuf chain containing all the mbufs. */ > + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, 1); > + /* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */ > + if (!rte_mempool_full(pool)) { > + printf("mempool not full\n"); > + goto err; > + } > + > + printf("Test bulk free of multiple chains using multiple pools.\n"); > + > + /* Create mbuf chains containing mbufs from different pools. */ > + for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF * 2; i++) { > + m = rte_pktmbuf_alloc((i & 4) ? pool2 : pool); > + if (m == NULL) { > + printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc() failed (%u)\n", i); > + goto err; > + } > + if ((i % 16) == 0) { > + mbufs[i / 16] = m; > + } else { > + rte_pktmbuf_chain(mbufs[i / 16], m); > + } > + } The 16 could be a #define CHAIN_LEN. Maybe another bug_on: RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(NB_MBUF % (CHAIN_LEN / 2) == 0) > + /* Test that both pools have been emptied. */ > + if (!(rte_mempool_empty(pool) && rte_mempool_empty(pool2))) { > + printf("mempools not empty\n"); > + goto err; > + } > + /* Free one mbuf chain. */ > + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, 1); > + /* Test that the segments have been returned to the pools. */ > + if (!(rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) == 8 && > + rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2) == 8)) { > + printf("all segments of first mbuf have not been returned\n"); > + goto err; > + } > + /* Free the remaining mbuf chains. */ > + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&mbufs[1], NB_MBUF * 2 / 16 - 1); > + /* Test that they have been returned to the pools. */ > + if (!(rte_mempool_full(pool) && rte_mempool_full(pool2))) { > + printf("mempools not full\n"); > + goto err; > + } Use CHAIN_LEN in the code above. > + > + rte_mempool_free(pool); > + rte_mempool_free(pool2); > + return 0; > + > +err: > + rte_mempool_free(pool); > + rte_mempool_free(pool2); > + return -1; > +} > + > /* > * test that the pointer to the data on a packet mbuf is set properly > */ > @@ -1162,6 +1327,12 @@ test_mbuf(void) > goto err; > } > > + /* test bulk mbuf alloc and free */ > + if (test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk() < 0) { > + printf("test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk() failed\n"); > + goto err; > + } > + > /* test that the pointer to the data on a packet mbuf is set properly */ > if (test_pktmbuf_pool_ptr(pktmbuf_pool) < 0) { > printf("test_pktmbuf_pool_ptr() failed\n"); > -- > 2.17.1 > Thanks! Olivier ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-16 7:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-10-11 12:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] mbuf: add bulk free function Morten Brørup 2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] " Morten Brørup 2019-10-16 7:35 ` Olivier Matz 2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions Morten Brørup 2019-10-16 7:54 ` Olivier Matz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).