From: Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
To: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, akhil.goyal@nxp.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] cryptodev: fix check related to device id
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 19:50:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191015165034.24276-1-julien.meunier@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190807083946.39309-1-julien.meunier@nokia.com>
Each cryptodev are indexed with dev_id in the global rte_crypto_devices
variable. nb_devs is incremented / decremented each time a cryptodev is
created / deleted. The goal of nb_devs was to prevent the user to get an
invalid dev_id.
Let's imagine DPDK has configured N cryptodevs. If the cryptodev=1 is
removed at runtime, the latest cryptodev N cannot be accessible, because
nb_devs=N-1 with the current implementaion.
In order to prevent this kind of behavior, let's remove the check with
nb_devs and iterate in all the rte_crypto_devices elements: if data is
not NULL, that means a valid cryptodev is available.
Also, remove max_devs field and use RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS in order to
unify the code.
Fixes: d11b0f30df88 ("cryptodev: introduce API and framework for crypto devices")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
---
v2:
* Restore nb_devs
* Update headline (check-git-log.sh)
* Update commit log
lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
index b16ef7b..933c38d 100644
--- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
@@ -50,8 +50,7 @@
static struct rte_cryptodev_global cryptodev_globals = {
.devs = rte_crypto_devices,
.data = { NULL },
- .nb_devs = 0,
- .max_devs = RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS
+ .nb_devs = 0
};
/* spinlock for crypto device callbacks */
@@ -512,7 +511,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
if (name == NULL)
return NULL;
- for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
dev = &cryptodev_globals.devs[i];
if ((dev->attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) &&
@@ -523,12 +522,21 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
return NULL;
}
+static uint8_t
+rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(uint8_t dev_id)
+{
+ if (rte_crypto_devices[dev_id].data == NULL)
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
unsigned int
rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(uint8_t dev_id)
{
struct rte_cryptodev *dev = NULL;
- if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs)
+ if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(dev_id))
return 0;
dev = rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_dev(dev_id);
@@ -547,12 +555,15 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
if (name == NULL)
return -1;
- for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.nb_devs; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
+ if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
+ continue;
if ((strcmp(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data->name, name)
== 0) &&
(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED))
return i;
+ }
return -1;
}
@@ -568,7 +579,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
{
uint8_t i, dev_count = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++)
if (cryptodev_globals.devs[i].driver_id == driver_id &&
cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED)
@@ -583,9 +594,10 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
{
uint8_t i, count = 0;
struct rte_cryptodev *devs = cryptodev_globals.devs;
- uint8_t max_devs = cryptodev_globals.max_devs;
- for (i = 0; i < max_devs && count < nb_devices; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS && count < nb_devices; i++) {
+ if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
+ continue;
if (devs[i].attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) {
int cmp;
@@ -1101,7 +1113,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
{
struct rte_cryptodev *dev;
- if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs) {
+ if (!rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(dev_id)) {
CDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid dev_id=%d", dev_id);
return;
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 8:39 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] cryptodev: fix invalid dev_id after a pmd close Julien Meunier
2019-10-03 12:49 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-15 13:44 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-15 14:39 ` Meunier, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
2019-10-15 16:50 ` Julien Meunier [this message]
2019-10-16 7:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] cryptodev: fix check related to device id Akhil Goyal
2019-10-16 7:16 ` Meunier, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
2019-10-16 10:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Julien Meunier
2019-10-16 12:49 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191015165034.24276-1-julien.meunier@nokia.com \
--to=julien.meunier@nokia.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).