From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Venumadhav Josyula <vjosyula@gmail.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org,
Venumadhav Josyula <vjosyula@parallelwireless.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] time taken for allocation of mempool.
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:32:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191113083217.GC4841@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+i0PGXsCscS9y8rKR2P8qfjHBunznv8SHX4=ESm0eCYrhP7ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Venu,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:42:07AM +0530, Venumadhav Josyula wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Few more points
>
> Operating system : Centos 7.6
> Logging mechanism : syslog
>
> We have logged using syslog before the call and syslog after the call.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Venu
>
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 10:37, Venumadhav Josyula <vjosyula@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
> > We are using 'rte_mempool_create' for allocation of flow memory. This has
> > been there for a while. We just migrated to dpdk-18.11 from dpdk-17.05. Now
> > here is problem statement
> >
> > Problem statement :
> > In new dpdk ( 18.11 ), the 'rte_mempool_create' take approximately ~4.4
> > sec for allocation compared to older dpdk (17.05). We have som 8-9 mempools
> > for our entire product. We do upfront allocation for all of them ( i.e.
> > when dpdk application is coming up). Our application is run to completion
> > model.
> >
> > Questions:-
> > i) is that acceptable / has anybody seen such a thing ?
> > ii) What has changed between two dpdk versions ( 18.11 v/s 17.05 ) from
> > memory perspective ?
Could you give some more details about you use case? (hugepage size, number
of objects, object size, additional mempool flags, ...)
Did you manage to reproduce it in a small test example? We could do some
profiling to investigate.
Thanks for the feedback.
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-13 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 5:07 Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-13 5:12 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-13 8:32 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2019-11-13 9:11 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-13 9:30 ` Olivier Matz
2019-11-13 9:19 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-11-13 17:26 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-13 21:01 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-14 9:44 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-14 9:50 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-14 9:57 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-18 16:43 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-12-06 10:47 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-12-06 10:49 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-14 8:12 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-14 9:49 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-14 9:53 ` Venumadhav Josyula
2019-11-18 16:45 ` Venumadhav Josyula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191113083217.GC4841@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
--cc=vjosyula@gmail.com \
--cc=vjosyula@parallelwireless.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).