From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AF1A04C1; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:52:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D952C28; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:52:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (mail-wr1-f50.google.com [209.85.221.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7362BF9 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:51:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id t1so7838191wrv.4 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:51:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=yeTTRpadGAGN0f4zcJiot7wZd+n3188TF6W/+kiApaY=; b=aue82cBpqZnYQmLjfmq8DtTO0v0V1lCbKOzrNDIIGesvII1+HIMNRNz8Ryur8zJB0J /M+hDFCJskEzOAe1D4hy7zk7gYlYr/38hOv95JtVYtpY5rjNPZkhv/P7jTvKKq2Njcno 9YslbiQvhpifK09fkqWqZMjonVRibxWYI0BT/Fag5bQECRQBTEslqYN/BEH/nCMFfK8b tb1NWNziLdRjRuucPj+DAAidc+oc7hx4ngNiDjnKH2QE9FU9O+aXt0KF8WpOYO98OkIr gCxRPAP2MH2wBVc9/MGEGZzF0S1MpXY0OIn8NEWv4SkgXFffb/+nMTPmYBus43ZmhLms llgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=yeTTRpadGAGN0f4zcJiot7wZd+n3188TF6W/+kiApaY=; b=pvCY69g53spOUiximdzkSRIzpMgfR7CN3MFjodHPXJWvcym+JdEq1c9K8VeTon3J3b I5TFcd8RwOb2rec/7+KL+/HExM/iOleB1P0Gb7gY6E+Wq9XBb4WYYKH9FIyb6nJ4nHXW te1Y3a5Qo1ZgtnWDpmPZGLa2OXw+UaY/i8o0ScXZ+kHCurZPeAPTOOKGOe3Gd0mhst3U o3ehgQiTF7dKRs+UCN2fxeocMb888yub7so2ODzjywtw6kXEXhQLwU4S3u1rVaQ3lWVG 7txJ6Wqzfd9GSh2jc/+OOY8KavvI48CW9oVzP08UecVIFNJXAX01KELLnJYd2qGO76h8 4BuA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU6B7czR1yqRNXlohVgmGof66L+S1H0bzKc5cMaxf7e4R23qiQO crXTF1HYWiBk2ZoOEIG6sLUjiA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyP3K8mCHdPqk63JKOmb1CCBEtRfsNG5+Hkhr2KikxoupMCtl+ALDA6VkUxWy3XXZIkPZ/EBQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ea88:: with SMTP id s8mr16858394wrm.120.1574416318852; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:51:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from 6wind.com (2a01cb0c0005a600345636f7e65ed1a0.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb0c:5:a600:3456:36f7:e65e:d1a0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g207sm2532131wmg.40.2019.11.22.01.51.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:51:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:51:57 +0100 From: Olivier Matz To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <20191122095157.GG8680@platinum> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf autotest fails with 19.11-rc3 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Jerin, On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:24:24PM +0000, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran wrote: > mbuf autotest fails with 19.11-rc3 > > $ echo "mbuf_autotest" | sudo ./build/app/test/dpdk-test -c 0x3 > > EAL: Detected 56 lcore(s) > EAL: Detected 2 NUMA nodes > EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/rte/mp_socket > EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'PA' > EAL: No available hugepages reported in hugepages-1048576kB > EAL: Probing VFIO support... > EAL: PCI device 0000:01:00.0 on NUMA socket 0 > EAL: probe driver: 8086:1521 net_e1000_igb > EAL: PCI device 0000:01:00.1 on NUMA socket 0 > EAL: probe driver: 8086:1521 net_e1000_igb > APP: HPET is not enabled, using TSC as default timer > RTE>>mbuf_autotest > Test mbuf dynamic fields and flags > Reserved fields: > Reserved flags: > Free space in mbuf (0 = free, value = zone alignment): > 0000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0008: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0018: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0028: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0038: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0040: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0048: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0050: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0058: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0068: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0070: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 > 0078: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 > dynfield: offset=112, offset2=114, offset3=120 > dynflag: flag=23, flag2=24, flag3=40 > Reserved fields: > name=test-dynfield offset=112 size=1 align=1 flags=0 > name=test-dynfield2 offset=114 size=2 align=2 flags=0 > name=test-dynfield3 offset=120 size=1 align=1 flags=0 > Reserved flags: > name=test-dynflag bitnum=23 flags=0 > name=test-dynflag2 bitnum=24 flags=0 > name=test-dynflag3 bitnum=40 flags=0 > Free space in mbuf (0 = free, value = zone alignment): > 0000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0008: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0018: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0028: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0038: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0040: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0048: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0050: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0058: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0068: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 0070: 00 01 00 00 04 04 04 04 > 0078: 00 01 02 02 04 04 04 04 > cannot allocate mbuf pool > Test Failed Could you please share some details about your configuration? (amount of memory, arch, ...) On my platform the test works, except if I use a very low amount of memory (few MBs). Thanks, Olivier