From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F387FA04B5; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:40:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EADF1BDFD; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:40:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81B71B9B7 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:40:18 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Dec 2019 07:40:17 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,268,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="204600524" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.46]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 02 Dec 2019 07:40:16 -0800 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:40:12 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: David Marchand Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dev , Neil Horman , Ray Kinsella Message-ID: <20191202154012.GA34@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20191202145718.16407-1-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:29:06PM +0100, David Marchand wrote: > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > > > --- > > > > I would prefer increasing the ABI version to 20.2 > > for an easy mapping with code version: > > DPDK 19.11 = ABI 20 > > libs 19.11 = .so.20.0 > > DPDK 20.02 = ABI 20 > > libs 20.02 = .so.20.2 > > DPDK 20.05 = ABI 20 > > libs 20.05 = .so.20.5 > > DPDK 20.08 = ABI 20 > > libs 20.08 = .so.20.8 > > > > Opinions? > > +1 but no strong opinion. > I like that idea too, though again no strong opinion either way.