From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
David Marchand <dmarchan@redhat.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] service: don't walk out of bounds when checking services
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 16:15:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191203211544.20285-1-aconole@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191126145606.13626-1-aconole@redhat.com>
The service_valid call is used without properly bounds checking the
input parameter. Almost all instances of the service_valid call are
inside a for() loop that prevents excessive walks, but some of the
public APIs don't bounds check and will pass invalid arguments.
Prevent this by using SERVICE_GET_OR_ERR_RET where it makes sense,
and adding a bounds check to one service_valid() use.
Fixes: 8d39d3e237c2 ("service: fix race in service on app lcore function")
Fixes: e9139a32f6e8 ("service: add function to run on app lcore")
Fixes: e30dd31847d2 ("service: add mechanism for quiescing")
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
---
v2:
- make for() loop consistent and service_run() always require a valid 's'
pointer
- introduce service_get() for a future patch to clean up the
bare references to 'rte_services[i]'
- remove some useless 'inline' specifiers on functions (they aren't
needed in .c files). a future patch can clean up the others.
lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
index 79235c03f8..7e537b8cd2 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c
@@ -137,6 +137,12 @@ service_valid(uint32_t id)
return !!(rte_services[id].internal_flags & SERVICE_F_REGISTERED);
}
+static struct rte_service_spec_impl *
+service_get(uint32_t id)
+{
+ return &rte_services[id];
+}
+
/* validate ID and retrieve service pointer, or return error value */
#define SERVICE_VALID_GET_OR_ERR_RET(id, service, retval) do { \
if (id >= RTE_SERVICE_NUM_MAX || !service_valid(id)) \
@@ -344,12 +350,14 @@ rte_service_runner_do_callback(struct rte_service_spec_impl *s,
}
-static inline int32_t
-service_run(uint32_t i, struct core_state *cs, uint64_t service_mask)
+/* Expects the service 's' is valid. */
+static int32_t
+service_run(uint32_t i, struct core_state *cs, uint64_t service_mask,
+ struct rte_service_spec_impl *s)
{
- if (!service_valid(i))
+ if (!s)
return -EINVAL;
- struct rte_service_spec_impl *s = &rte_services[i];
+
if (s->comp_runstate != RUNSTATE_RUNNING ||
s->app_runstate != RUNSTATE_RUNNING ||
!(service_mask & (UINT64_C(1) << i))) {
@@ -383,7 +391,7 @@ rte_service_may_be_active(uint32_t id)
int32_t lcore_count = rte_service_lcore_list(ids, RTE_MAX_LCORE);
int i;
- if (!service_valid(id))
+ if (id >= RTE_SERVICE_NUM_MAX || !service_valid(id))
return -EINVAL;
for (i = 0; i < lcore_count; i++) {
@@ -397,12 +405,10 @@ rte_service_may_be_active(uint32_t id)
int32_t
rte_service_run_iter_on_app_lcore(uint32_t id, uint32_t serialize_mt_unsafe)
{
- /* run service on calling core, using all-ones as the service mask */
- if (!service_valid(id))
- return -EINVAL;
-
struct core_state *cs = &lcore_states[rte_lcore_id()];
- struct rte_service_spec_impl *s = &rte_services[id];
+ struct rte_service_spec_impl *s;
+
+ SERVICE_VALID_GET_OR_ERR_RET(id, s, -EINVAL);
/* Atomically add this core to the mapped cores first, then examine if
* we can run the service. This avoids a race condition between
@@ -418,7 +424,7 @@ rte_service_run_iter_on_app_lcore(uint32_t id, uint32_t serialize_mt_unsafe)
return -EBUSY;
}
- int ret = service_run(id, cs, UINT64_MAX);
+ int ret = service_run(id, cs, UINT64_MAX, s);
if (serialize_mt_unsafe)
rte_atomic32_dec(&s->num_mapped_cores);
@@ -438,8 +444,10 @@ rte_service_runner_func(void *arg)
const uint64_t service_mask = cs->service_mask;
for (i = 0; i < RTE_SERVICE_NUM_MAX; i++) {
+ if (!service_valid(i))
+ continue;
/* return value ignored as no change to code flow */
- service_run(i, cs, service_mask);
+ service_run(i, cs, service_mask, service_get(i));
}
cs->loops++;
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-03 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-26 14:56 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Aaron Conole
2019-12-02 16:16 ` Eads, Gage
2019-12-02 16:19 ` David Marchand
2019-12-03 15:10 ` Aaron Conole
2019-12-03 21:15 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2019-12-04 8:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " David Marchand
2019-12-04 8:34 ` David Marchand
2019-12-20 14:43 ` David Marchand
2020-02-07 12:04 ` Kevin Traynor
2020-02-07 14:27 ` Aaron Conole
2020-02-14 16:38 ` Kevin Traynor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191203211544.20285-1-aconole@redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).