From: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru@marvell.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:37:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191218070721.16768-2-skori@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191218070721.16768-1-skori@marvell.com>
Currently otx2_mbox_get_rsp_xxx get response once AF driver
interrupts after completion. But this funciton will get into
deadlock if called in another interrupt context.
To avoid it, implemented another version of this function which polls
on dedicated memory for a given timeout.
Also after clearing interrupt, there could UP messages available for
processing. So irq handler must check mbox messages.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>
---
v5:
- Fix shared library compilation error
v4:
- used rte_io_rmb instead of rte_rmb in mbox_poll.
v3:
- Remove experimental tag as API is defined static.
- Merge all changes to single patch.
v2:
- Included Makefile and meson build changes.
- Rebased patch on 19.11-rc4
drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_dev.c | 41 +++++++++++---------
drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.h | 5 ++-
3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_dev.c b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_dev.c
index 0fc799e4a..d61c712fa 100644
--- a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_dev.c
@@ -577,17 +577,16 @@ otx2_pf_vf_mbox_irq(void *param)
intr = otx2_read64(dev->bar2 + RVU_VF_INT);
if (intr == 0)
- return;
+ otx2_base_dbg("Proceeding to check mbox UP messages if any");
otx2_write64(intr, dev->bar2 + RVU_VF_INT);
otx2_base_dbg("Irq 0x%" PRIx64 "(pf:%d,vf:%d)", intr, dev->pf, dev->vf);
- if (intr) {
- /* First process all configuration messages */
- otx2_process_msgs(dev, dev->mbox);
- /* Process Uplink messages */
- otx2_process_msgs_up(dev, &dev->mbox_up);
- }
+ /* First process all configuration messages */
+ otx2_process_msgs(dev, dev->mbox);
+
+ /* Process Uplink messages */
+ otx2_process_msgs_up(dev, &dev->mbox_up);
}
static void
@@ -598,18 +597,16 @@ otx2_af_pf_mbox_irq(void *param)
intr = otx2_read64(dev->bar2 + RVU_PF_INT);
if (intr == 0)
- return;
+ otx2_base_dbg("Proceeding to check mbox UP messages if any");
otx2_write64(intr, dev->bar2 + RVU_PF_INT);
-
otx2_base_dbg("Irq 0x%" PRIx64 "(pf:%d,vf:%d)", intr, dev->pf, dev->vf);
- if (intr) {
- /* First process all configuration messages */
- otx2_process_msgs(dev, dev->mbox);
- /* Process Uplink messages */
- otx2_process_msgs_up(dev, &dev->mbox_up);
- }
+ /* First process all configuration messages */
+ otx2_process_msgs(dev, dev->mbox);
+
+ /* Process Uplink messages */
+ otx2_process_msgs_up(dev, &dev->mbox_up);
}
static int
@@ -900,6 +897,7 @@ otx2_dev_priv_init(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev, void *otx2_dev)
{
int up_direction = MBOX_DIR_PFAF_UP;
int rc, direction = MBOX_DIR_PFAF;
+ uint64_t intr_offset = RVU_PF_INT;
struct otx2_dev *dev = otx2_dev;
uintptr_t bar2, bar4;
uint64_t bar4_addr;
@@ -924,15 +922,18 @@ otx2_dev_priv_init(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev, void *otx2_dev)
if (otx2_dev_is_vf(dev)) {
direction = MBOX_DIR_VFPF;
up_direction = MBOX_DIR_VFPF_UP;
+ intr_offset = RVU_VF_INT;
}
/* Initialize the local mbox */
- rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_local, bar4, bar2, direction, 1);
+ rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_local, bar4, bar2, direction, 1,
+ intr_offset);
if (rc)
goto error;
dev->mbox = &dev->mbox_local;
- rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_up, bar4, bar2, up_direction, 1);
+ rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_up, bar4, bar2, up_direction, 1,
+ intr_offset);
if (rc)
goto error;
@@ -967,13 +968,15 @@ otx2_dev_priv_init(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev, void *otx2_dev)
}
/* Init mbox object */
rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_vfpf, (uintptr_t)hwbase,
- bar2, MBOX_DIR_PFVF, pci_dev->max_vfs);
+ bar2, MBOX_DIR_PFVF, pci_dev->max_vfs,
+ intr_offset);
if (rc)
goto iounmap;
/* PF -> VF UP messages */
rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_vfpf_up, (uintptr_t)hwbase,
- bar2, MBOX_DIR_PFVF_UP, pci_dev->max_vfs);
+ bar2, MBOX_DIR_PFVF_UP, pci_dev->max_vfs,
+ intr_offset);
if (rc)
goto mbox_fini;
}
diff --git a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.c b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.c
index c359bf42f..358e4b3bd 100644
--- a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.c
+++ b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <rte_cycles.h>
#include "otx2_mbox.h"
+#include "otx2_dev.h"
#define RVU_AF_AFPF_MBOX0 (0x02000)
#define RVU_AF_AFPF_MBOX1 (0x02008)
@@ -59,12 +60,13 @@ otx2_mbox_reset(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid)
}
int
-otx2_mbox_init(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, uintptr_t hwbase,
- uintptr_t reg_base, int direction, int ndevs)
+otx2_mbox_init(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, uintptr_t hwbase, uintptr_t reg_base,
+ int direction, int ndevs, uint64_t intr_offset)
{
struct otx2_mbox_dev *mdev;
int devid;
+ mbox->intr_offset = intr_offset;
mbox->reg_base = reg_base;
mbox->hwbase = hwbase;
@@ -230,8 +232,8 @@ otx2_mbox_get_rsp(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid, void **msg)
int rc;
rc = otx2_mbox_wait_for_rsp(mbox, devid);
- if (rc != 1)
- return -EIO;
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
rte_rmb();
@@ -244,6 +246,38 @@ otx2_mbox_get_rsp(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid, void **msg)
return msghdr->rc;
}
+/**
+ * Polling for given wait time to get mailbox response
+ */
+static int
+mbox_poll(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, uint32_t wait)
+{
+ uint32_t timeout = 0, sleep = 1;
+ uint32_t wait_us = wait * 1000;
+ uint64_t rsp_reg = 0;
+ uintptr_t reg_addr;
+
+ reg_addr = mbox->reg_base + mbox->intr_offset;
+ do {
+ rte_smp_rmb();
+ rsp_reg = otx2_read64(reg_addr);
+
+ if (timeout >= wait_us)
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+ rte_delay_us(sleep);
+ timeout += sleep;
+ } while (!rsp_reg);
+
+ /* Clear interrupt */
+ otx2_write64(rsp_reg, reg_addr);
+
+ /* Reset mbox */
+ otx2_mbox_reset(mbox, 0);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* @internal
* Wait and get mailbox response with timeout
@@ -258,8 +292,8 @@ otx2_mbox_get_rsp_tmo(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid, void **msg,
int rc;
rc = otx2_mbox_wait_for_rsp_tmo(mbox, devid, tmo);
- if (rc != 1)
- return -EIO;
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
rte_rmb();
@@ -321,11 +355,15 @@ otx2_mbox_wait_for_rsp_tmo(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid, uint32_t tmo)
}
/* Wait message */
- rc = mbox_wait(mbox, devid, tmo);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
+ if (rte_thread_is_intr())
+ rc = mbox_poll(mbox, tmo);
+ else
+ rc = mbox_wait(mbox, devid, tmo);
- return mdev->msgs_acked;
+ if (!rc)
+ rc = mdev->num_msgs;
+
+ return rc;
}
/**
diff --git a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.h b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.h
index e0e4e2f63..0535cec36 100644
--- a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.h
+++ b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.h
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ struct otx2_mbox {
uint16_t tx_size; /* Size of Tx region */
uint16_t ndevs; /* The number of peers */
struct otx2_mbox_dev *dev;
+ uint64_t intr_offset; /* Offset to interrupt register */
};
/* Header which precedes all mbox messages */
@@ -1562,8 +1563,8 @@ struct tim_enable_rsp {
const char *otx2_mbox_id2name(uint16_t id);
int otx2_mbox_id2size(uint16_t id);
void otx2_mbox_reset(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid);
-int otx2_mbox_init(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, uintptr_t hwbase,
- uintptr_t reg_base, int direction, int ndevs);
+int otx2_mbox_init(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, uintptr_t hwbase, uintptr_t reg_base,
+ int direction, int ndevsi, uint64_t intr_offset);
void otx2_mbox_fini(struct otx2_mbox *mbox);
void otx2_mbox_msg_send(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid);
int otx2_mbox_wait_for_rsp(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-18 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-25 11:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] drivers/octeontx2: allow experimental symbols Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-25 11:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-25 11:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] common/octeontx2: add interrupt offset to mbox structure Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-25 11:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-25 11:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] common/octeontx2: enhancing mbox APIs to get response Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-26 6:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] drivers/octeontx2: allow experimental symbols Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-26 16:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-27 8:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-27 9:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-27 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-27 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] common/octeontx2: add interrupt offset to mbox structure Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-27 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-27 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] drivers/octeontx2: enhancing mbox APIs to get response Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-28 0:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Stephen Hemminger
2019-11-28 8:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Harman Kalra
2019-11-28 16:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-12-04 16:23 ` Harman Kalra
2019-12-16 10:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-16 10:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-17 8:02 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-12-17 11:14 ` Jerin Jacob
2019-12-18 2:45 ` Gavin Hu
2019-12-17 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-17 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-17 16:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-17 16:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-18 2:54 ` Gavin Hu
2019-12-18 7:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-18 7:07 ` Sunil Kumar Kori [this message]
2019-12-20 6:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-20 6:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-01-14 8:41 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-01-14 10:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-14 9:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-01-14 9:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-01-21 8:37 ` Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-02-06 15:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context David Marchand
2020-01-14 8:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Jerin Jacob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191218070721.16768-2-skori@marvell.com \
--to=skori@marvell.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=vattunuru@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).